To: TASMANIANRED
Thank you for your insights and tales of experience.
23 posted on
06/18/2005 3:17:53 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
To: thompsonsjkc; odoso; animoveritas; DaveTesla; mercygrace; Laissez-faire capitalist; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping.
Good discussion on Living Wills, Advance Directives, what they really mean, and what happens in real life/death. Make sure you read TASMANIANRED's comments.
Freemail me if you want on/off this pinglist.
24 posted on
06/18/2005 3:24:13 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
To: little jeremiah
Thanks for your kind remarks.
I used to be a big supporter of living wills when they first started being discussed.
It seemed right and proper that people should have a say so in what happens to them at the end of their lives.
Then the Law of Unintended Consequences kicked in.
If you have a terminal illness they still may be a good thing.
However there are many many things that can happen that are temporary set backs and are completely correctable.
It is far more likely that you would experience a post OP Mi, a cardiac irregularity, a minor pulmonary embolis, a DVT, pulmonary edema, than it is to have a lethal occurrence.
There is no reason for a fatality for a non-lethal situation.
A Living Will/No code status greatly increases your chance of death from correctable situation.
28 posted on
06/19/2005 8:44:52 AM PDT by
TASMANIANRED
(Democrats haven't had a new idea since Karl Marx.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson