Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Live Thread: John Conyers' Downing Street Memo Circus, C-SPAN 3, 2:30 p.m. EDT 6/16/05
C-SPAN ^ | Thursday, June 16, 2005

Posted on 06/16/2005 11:28:48 AM PDT by kristinn

Forum
Downing Street Minutes and Pre-War Intelligence
U.S. House of Representatives, Conyers, J. (D-MI)
Washington, District of Columbia (United States)
ID: 187209 - 06/16/2005 - 2:00 - ns

Conyers, John Jr., U.S. Representative, D-MI
Bonifaz, John C., Founder, National Voting Rights Institute
Wilson, Joseph, Deputy Chief of Mission (1988-91), Iraq
McGovern, Ray, Member, Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity
Sheehan, Cindy, Mother

Rep. John Conyers, Jr., and other Democrats hold a public meeting concerning the "Downing Street Memo" and pre-war intelligence on Iraq.
On May 1, 2005 a Sunday London Times article disclosed the details of a classified memo, also known as the "Downing Street Minutes", recounting the minutes of a July 2002 meeting of Prime Minister Tony Blair with his advisers that depicted an American president already committed to going to war in the summer of 2002, despite contrary assertions to the public and the Congress. The minutes also described apparent efforts by Bush administration officials to manipulate intelligence data in order to justify the war to the international community.

The hearing is scheduled to be rerun on C-SPAN 2 at 8 p.m. EDT.

Follow this link to get a livestream of C-SPAN 3.


TOPICS: Announcements; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; britishmemo; conyers; downingstreetmemo; livethread
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 521-522 next last
To: Amityschild

AlRighT!! It's my Moderate Senator who is very strong on the military.!!!!

Attacks the notion that anything we do could possibly be associated.

"I feel apologies are called for" to the men and women of our armed forces.

"These allegations have no basis in fact or history".


McConnells' running this, now Martinez is up.


461 posted on 06/16/2005 2:46:50 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

To: All

Think about this:

If the MSM cover the memo as "proving Bush lied," it should be more damaging to their credibility than Rathergate.


462 posted on 06/16/2005 2:48:06 PM PDT by wolf2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Good! But Rush says no. It's what he really feels, just keep playing it over and over again.


463 posted on 06/16/2005 2:48:06 PM PDT by hipaatwo (When you're in trouble you want all your friends around you...preferably armed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

bookmark..numb computer butt


464 posted on 06/16/2005 2:49:06 PM PDT by hipaatwo (When you're in trouble you want all your friends around you...preferably armed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

I actually tend to agree with Rush on that, but it is a big, big smack to Durbin for Warner to say this. It's hugh in fact.


465 posted on 06/16/2005 2:49:24 PM PDT by Bahbah (Something wicked this way comes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

Durbin is speaking!


466 posted on 06/16/2005 2:51:13 PM PDT by Amityschild (I may be gullible BUT I'm not a DUmmie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Durbin is up.


467 posted on 06/16/2005 2:51:40 PM PDT by Bahbah (Something wicked this way comes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Durbin is on the floor will speak


468 posted on 06/16/2005 2:52:16 PM PDT by Amityschild (I may be gullible BUT I'm not a DUmmie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Durbin ALMOST up. Doesn't want to ask a question, so Warner is still talking, and then will give floor to Durbin.

Now he's making Durbin listen to his scolding....!!!!!!


469 posted on 06/16/2005 2:53:07 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

DUrbin starts by lying that he didn't know anything about his colleagues coming to talk about him....

Now he says the FBI report is uncontroverted. NOW HE IS GOING TO READ IT AGAIN.

"So my colleagues who might not have had time to reflect on it".....

"listen to this"

He's saying they didn't listen, and were stupid. And he thinks he has been mischaracterized.

I wish someone would get his comments (and the other comments) from Shultz's show.


470 posted on 06/16/2005 2:55:27 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Durbin is actually going to re-read the statement again so "his collegues can reflect upon it." What a lot of f'ing nerve. We've all heard the whole thing and we have come to our conclusions, and we are right, you are a piece of cr@p.


471 posted on 06/16/2005 2:55:49 PM PDT by Bahbah (Something wicked this way comes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Durbin doesn't get it!!! It was his comment!!!


472 posted on 06/16/2005 2:56:34 PM PDT by Amityschild (I may be gullible BUT I'm not a DUmmie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Durbin re-reading the same FBI agent's letter describing "atrocities" at Gitmo. Durbin's recap to CYA by laying blame on this letter.


473 posted on 06/16/2005 2:56:59 PM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

This FBI statement doesn't make sense. The agents says "A COUPLE OF TIMES I WENT INTO A ROOM". Note, "A COUPLE". Then he says "Often the detainees have", but he only did it a couple of times, not "often".


474 posted on 06/16/2005 2:57:11 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 470 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom

Cartman voice *I hate Democrats*


475 posted on 06/16/2005 2:57:56 PM PDT by Amityschild (I may be gullible BUT I'm not a DUmmie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Now he is repeating what he said yesterday. He doesn't get that, in context, his statement that you would assume this was horrible if you read it -- meaning he thinks this IS horrible.


476 posted on 06/16/2005 2:58:09 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 470 | View Replies]

To: Amityschild

OOPS...Cartman voice *Democrats Piss Me OFF!*


477 posted on 06/16/2005 2:58:24 PM PDT by Amityschild (I may be gullible BUT I'm not a DUmmie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Now he is saying that we wouldn't condone this conduct. Some might agree with that, and if he had simply SAID that I don't think there would be a real outrage.

But "not condoning" is a far cry from "sounds like a gulag, or "Hitler's holocaust".

"Re-write the rules". My god, wasn't that the line from the judicial fight?


478 posted on 06/16/2005 3:00:32 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 476 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

No apologies from Durbin yet?


479 posted on 06/16/2005 3:01:00 PM PDT by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04
Nope, obfuscation and bloviation.
480 posted on 06/16/2005 3:01:56 PM PDT by Amityschild (I may be gullible BUT I'm not a DUmmie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 521-522 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson