Posted on 06/16/2005 11:28:48 AM PDT by kristinn
Why is it that all of these people are sleazy whimps?
Oh, impeachment! Fun, fun!
Please read this..it's long but way worth it
(snip)In order to fully understand CCR's publicly stated reasons for advocating for prisoners at Guantanamo, which center on the concept of "civil rights," and to understand its lesser known but much more important reasons for wanting interrogations there halted, it is necessary to briefly examine the history of the CCR and its leadership, the types of clients it advocates for and its political affiliations. And a thorough examination of CCR's current president, Michael Ratner, who is the driving force behind the Guantanamo shut-down effort, is absolutely vital to understanding the position that CCR takes today regarding the rights of prisoners captured in the War on Terror.
Center for Constitutional Rights founded by Communists and anti-U.S. radicals
The CCR was founded in 1966 by attorneys Morton Stavis, William Kunstler, Ben Smith and Arthur Kinoy
http://antiprotester.blogspot.com/2005/06/michael-ratner-and-ccr-fighting.html
I have no idea. But she reminds me of Carolyn McCarthy who used her husband's was killed on the Long Island Railroad and she used his death for political purposes and to run for Congress.
during Reagan, so anything he says is so relevant.
Do I have to note my sarcasm?
Check out this little pencil neck geek that is up now, Boston based civil rights lawyer, suprise! They are so serious about this! Where are their tinfoil hats?
No, Joe Wilson plays on the French team.
They dragged him out again? He still associating with this McGovern guy?
The storied history of the Gold Star Mothers is also being sullied by her. I'm sorry for her loss but she's a lost case.
ahhhhh
Warrior King: The Case for Impeaching George Bush - a new book by John Bonifaz
In February and March 2003, John Bonifaz served as lead counsel for a coalition of US soldiers, their parents, and Members of Congress in a
federal lawsuit challenging the authority of President Bush to launch a war against Iraq absent a congressional declaration of war. Needless to say, the suit failed to prevent the invasion and occupation but Bonifaz's arguments about the constitutional violations inherent in Bush foreign policy are still politically potent.
Bonifaz lays out his case in a new release from Nation Books, Warrior King: The Case for Impeaching George Bush. "President Bill Clinton was
ultimately censured over alleged charges of perjury and obstruction of justice," says Bonifaz. "But no one died as a result of the Monica Lewinsky
affair. President George W. Bush's offenses to the Constitution are far more serious and have resulted in the deaths of thousands. It is time for Congress to investigate whether the president's offenses constitute high crimes worthy of impeachment. To protect and uphold the Constitution, that
process should begin."
***I don't remember Bill Clinton being censured, do you?
Thanks
Okay--the impeachment has been called for by this idiot--
It is up to the Congresscritters to come out NOW, and say that the impeachment talk will stop NOW...
9/11 has nothing to do with Iraq.
Prove it. ;-)
BWAAAA HAAA HAAAA! And we are supposed to listen to this LOSER? The White House (if they are watching) must be laughing like crazy!
I took it to mean "lining up" or "arranging" or "organizing." It does not mean making things up.
No Billy boy skated!
I hit your link and got a blank screen---
These People are a COMPLETE JOKE!!!
I need to head out .. please ping me if they say anything intellegent *L*
Your welcome. As soon as I saw Kuntzlers name I knew it was bad news.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.