Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boston Blackie
tobacco law specialists said the decision is one of the "nation's first to declare smoking a nuisance serious enough to become grounds for eviction.

''It is very important, because it is a sign that people are more aware of how dangerous second-hand smoke is," said Professor Richard Daynard, chairman of Northeastern University's Tobacco Products Liability Project, which tracks second-hand smoke litigation nationally."

how dangerous second-hand smoke is?"

Bullsh_t. This not about "dangerous second-hand smoke."

This is a "property rights" issue and victory.

I am a landlord and I decide what can and cannot be done on my property.

If, as a renter you do not like my decision, see you later.

26 posted on 06/16/2005 6:02:09 AM PDT by tahiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tahiti
If, as a renter you do not like my decision, see you later.

Exactly! That's why I own my own home. I'm da Boss!!!

30 posted on 06/16/2005 6:05:26 AM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: tahiti
I am a landlord and I decide what can and cannot be done on my property.

I agree..........and that should extend to all business people.

35 posted on 06/16/2005 6:08:19 AM PDT by Gabz (My give-a-damn is busted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: tahiti
I am a landlord and I decide what can and cannot be done on my property.

If, as a renter you do not like my decision, see you later.


I agree, from a big picture perspective, the property owner should have the ultimate say.

Anyone who tries to make this a smokers rights issue is off the mark.

However I do think that a no smoking clause should be indicated on the front end of the agreement.
41 posted on 06/16/2005 6:13:20 AM PDT by HEY4QDEMS (Who owns this car with the peace sign, the mag wheels, and four on the floor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: tahiti

What about car exaust, diesel fumes from busses as I walk down the street, smoke stack emissions, etc etc. Where does it end?

If people have the right NOT to smell cigarette smoke, then certainly I have the right not to inhale car exaust and industrail pollution which IS dangerous to my health.

maybe we should all go back to horse and buggy's, although I'm sure someone can't stand the smell of horses or is allergic to them...
The insanity has to end somewhere. Better yet, don't let the insanity start. If you don't like to be around cigarette smoke, GET UP AND MOVE TO ANOTHER SPOT. Find a smoke free restaurant, bar etc etc.


79 posted on 06/16/2005 6:58:33 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: tahiti
I am a landlord and I decide what can and cannot be done on my property.

Ever hear of the Fair Housing Act, zoning, wetlands and a myriad of other property laws?

158 posted on 06/16/2005 12:47:29 PM PDT by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: tahiti
I am a landlord and I decide what can and cannot be done on my property.

This is not a property issue, it's a contract issue. The landlord had the right to permit or deny smoking and executed that right when signing the lease permitting smoking. But once the landlord signed the lease permitting smoking the landlord should be held to the contract.

The complaining tenant knew smoking was permitted, so they have little room to complain. They need to find a non-smoking building.

166 posted on 06/16/2005 1:36:50 PM PDT by slowhandluke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson