[A CA Guy]

Out of 150,000 people, there is going to be also a statistical percentage of crooks, liars and crazy people coming through that claim all kinds of bunk as well, and I think the lack of evidence in this case backs that up.

[MizSterious]

You watched a different case than I did, then. A relative sat on a jury not long ago (locally) that convicted someone for child molestation with NO physical evidence, only the children's word. (And one child was too young to even testify.) There was plenty of evidence in the Jackson case. You, like the jury, are demanding proof beyond ALL doubt, not beyond REASONABLE doubt.