Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giscard regrets constitution sent to French people
EU Observer ^ | 6/15/05 | Lisbeth Kirk

Posted on 06/15/2005 7:51:39 AM PDT by Unam Sanctam

It was a crucial mistake to send out the entire constitution to every French voter, the architect of the EU's first constitution Valéry Giscard d'Estaing has said in an interview.

In an interview with the New York Times, his first since the French rejection of the constitution two weeks ago, the former French president apportions most of the blame to president Jacques Chirac for failure in the referendum campaign.

One crucial mistake was to send out the entire three-part, 448-article document to every French voter, said Mr Giscard.

Over the phone he had warned Mr Chirac already in March: "I said, 'Don't do it, don't do it'".

"It is not possible for anyone to understand the full text".

Mr Giscard d'Estaing also puts the blame on the present generation of political leaders.

Neither Mr Chirac nor other European leaders had a strategy for ratifying the constitution, he said.

"The present generation of leaders, whatever their strengths, never put Europe at the top of their agenda".

Mr Giscard d'Estaing was appointed by EU leaders at the Laeken summit in December 2001 to head a 102-member convention and draft a European Constitution.

Today Mr Giscard believes the constitution probably would have passed in France if the EU leaders had not left open the possibility of full EU membership for Turkey.

This week the bloc's leaders will meet in Brussels to decide the fate of the constitution, or "my document", as Mr Giscard puts it.

The ratification process should continue across Europe, the former president advises and predicts: "In the end, it will pass", he added. "There is no better solution".


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: condescendingliberal; dcemocratplaybook; deathofthewest; destaing; euconstitution; france; scarystuff; sdontneedno; stinkingdemocracy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
The arrogance here is just breathtaking -- the peasants will never understand a document that their betters have prepared for them, so they shouldn't have been shown the actual document and instead just told to shut up and vote "Oui".
1 posted on 06/15/2005 7:51:39 AM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam

Your comment says it all - If their Constitution had been written so precise and concise, it might have passed.


2 posted on 06/15/2005 7:53:27 AM PDT by RS (Just because they are out to get him, it doesn't mean he's not guilty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam

I don't often get shocked, and least often by anything the French may or may not do, but this floors me.


3 posted on 06/15/2005 7:54:31 AM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam
"I said, 'Don't do it, don't do it'". "It is not possible for anyone to understand the full text".

Yep, only political elites have the necessary brainpower to comprehend such a document.

4 posted on 06/15/2005 7:56:24 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam

Our own open borders elites won't make this mistake when they create the North American Union.


5 posted on 06/15/2005 7:56:26 AM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam
It was a crucial mistake to send out the entire constitution to every French voter, the architect of the EU's first constitution Valéry Giscard d'Estaing has said in an interview.

Yeah, if you want to get your obnoxious agenda passed, then you absolutely have to keep your constituents ignorant of it. This is certainly the first rule of thumb from the Totalitarian's Handbook, used everyday in Dictatorship 101...
6 posted on 06/15/2005 7:56:39 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam

There is a reason why Valéry Giscard d'Estaing is the only President of the Fifth Republic to have failed to be re-elected by the people.

And he continues to manifest that reason all of these years later.

Restrain the nature, it returns at a gallop. Giscard's arrogance is the reason Giscard is a political failure.


7 posted on 06/15/2005 7:57:19 AM PDT by Vicomte13 (Et alors?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam
"It is not possible for anyone to understand the full text".

I often sign 488 page legal documents that not only I don't understand, but it is impossible for anyone to understand.

8 posted on 06/15/2005 7:57:44 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Republicans and Democrats no longer exist. There are only Fabian and revolutionary socialists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

bttt


9 posted on 06/15/2005 7:58:19 AM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam

"It is not possible for anyone to understand the full text".

This quote says all you need to know....

10 posted on 06/15/2005 7:58:35 AM PDT by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam
One crucial mistake was to send out the entire three-part, 448-article document to every French voter

Should have sent it only to voters supporting it?

11 posted on 06/15/2005 7:59:06 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam
"It is not possible for anyone to understand the full text".

I can't think of a stronger argument against ratifying any proposed constitution that this observation of Giscard.

12 posted on 06/15/2005 7:59:26 AM PDT by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam

d'Estaing is still alive?


13 posted on 06/15/2005 8:00:25 AM PDT by LIConFem (A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam

Well, here's the documents our guys are putting together.
You bet we won't be voting on it.

http://www.cfr.org/pub7914/press_release/trinational_call_for_a_north_american_economic_and_security_community_by_2010.php

http://www.cfr.org/pub8104/press_release/task_force_urges_measures_to_strengthen_north_american_competitiveness_expand_trade_ensure_border_security.php


14 posted on 06/15/2005 8:01:02 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Stay well, stay safe, stay armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam

Man, that pesky democracy....don't you just hate it when the people get in the way of the elites deciding what's good for them.


15 posted on 06/15/2005 8:01:14 AM PDT by Dems_R_Losers (Barbara Boxer is deeply saddened......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam

Translation: "Vote first, and learn what you've voted for afterward. In fact, just shut up and vote."


16 posted on 06/15/2005 8:01:24 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
"I often sign 488 page legal documents that not only I don't understand, but it is impossible for anyone to understand."

Wasn't that used as a defense by some of the Enron people ?
17 posted on 06/15/2005 8:01:34 AM PDT by RS (Just because they are out to get him, it doesn't mean he's not guilty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam
"It is not possible for anyone to understand the full text".

Wouldn't that be a good reason to reject it?

18 posted on 06/15/2005 8:01:52 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RS
If their Constitution had been written so precise and concise

I look at ours, note what has happened to it over the past 216 years, and can easily understand why they might value precision over brevity.

19 posted on 06/15/2005 8:01:58 AM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

fyi


20 posted on 06/15/2005 8:02:16 AM PDT by Eurotwit (WI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson