Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: Matrix1948
Another bottom feeder seeks self agrandizement...
2 posted on
06/14/2005 3:24:42 PM PDT by
GulfBreeze
("Chair"itable contributions accepted...)
To: Matrix1948
3 posted on
06/14/2005 3:25:56 PM PDT by
Williams
To: Matrix1948
Utter horsesh!t not worth posting.
These conspiracy nuts are worse than pond scum.
5 posted on
06/14/2005 3:26:32 PM PDT by
MediaMole
To: Matrix1948
6 posted on
06/14/2005 3:27:14 PM PDT by
GloriaJane
(http://music.download.com/gloriajane "Seems Like Our Press Has Turned Against Our Country")
To: Matrix1948
7 posted on
06/14/2005 3:27:57 PM PDT by
Kozak
(Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
To: Matrix1948
Why are we stuck with these kooks? The indirect message here is that the Muslims are completely innocent and we are attacking Muslims as scapegoats to promote some other agenda. And this is what our people are saying and doing. Is there any way we can win a war with kooky tin foil hat nut cases like this?
8 posted on
06/14/2005 3:28:38 PM PDT by
putupjob
To: Matrix1948
Further "proof" for the likes of DU.
To: Matrix1948
Yeah, he's an "expert" in this area--Just like th ever present unsoucred "CIA officials" who undercut everything the Administration says ans does and who I suspect must be washroom attendants at Langley.
To: Matrix1948
'If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling,'And if my grandmother had balls, she'd be my grandfather.
12 posted on
06/14/2005 3:29:37 PM PDT by
Politicalities
(http://www.politicalities.com)
To: Matrix1948
13 posted on
06/14/2005 3:29:49 PM PDT by
conservativewasp
(Support John Kerry......... Ho Chi Minh would. Damn! Now I need a new tagline.)
To: Matrix1948
bring back the Sedition Laws .
this is a good example of Sedition
it should be prosecutable.
15 posted on
06/14/2005 3:30:05 PM PDT by
injin
To: Matrix1948
No, this ignoramus did not "cast doubt" on the explanation of the attack on the WTC. He only cast doubt on his own sanity. And, though the article touts him as a "former Bush official," he was one of the small number of DEMOCRATS in the Administration, as an effort to reach across the aisle.
Plus, when you read samples of this man's prior writing, he is as consistently fact-free and politically biased as Noam Chomsky. In short, this is a card-carrying fool, and only another fool would take him at all seriously.
Did I miss anything?
Congressman Billybob
Latest column: "Gitmo In, Gitmo Out?"
16 posted on
06/14/2005 3:30:34 PM PDT by
Congressman Billybob
(For copies of my speech, "Dealing with Outlaw Judges," please Freepmail me.)
To: Matrix1948
Supposedly a former labor dept employee/ professor is quoted as questioning the engineering data, an area in which he would have zero expertise.
My favorite is his quote that "19 hijackers couldn't have outfoxed the mighty US military" Uh, they outfoxed security on a few commercial airliners having absolutely zip to do with the US military.
18 posted on
06/14/2005 3:30:45 PM PDT by
Williams
To: Matrix1948
This is going to drive the DU moon-bats absolutely over the edge!
To: Matrix1948
Sigh....I wish these people would just go away....an inside job huh.....sh!t fire....not even Clintons and Reno would do that for crying out loud....what would the "insiders" have to gain?
20 posted on
06/14/2005 3:33:42 PM PDT by
B.O. Plenty
(Liberalism and islam are terminal.......)
To: Matrix1948
Morgan Reynolds apparently has a history of these allegations, which is why LewRockwell.com has a page of his archived writings.
Admit it, the French were Right is my favorite.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds-arch.html
21 posted on
06/14/2005 3:33:49 PM PDT by
aynrandfreak
(When can we stop pretending that the Left doesn't by and large hate America?)
To: Matrix1948
Hey man, why are you drilling holes in all the support columns and then cutting notches in the steel beams with a torch. And what is with all these wires being strung throughout the building? Oh, you say you are just wiring in a new super fast internet connection? Sweet!
22 posted on
06/14/2005 3:34:18 PM PDT by
faq
To: Matrix1948
Fire had never before caused steel-frame buildings to collapse except for the three buildings on 9/11, nor has fire collapsed any steel high rise since 9/11. Kind of like what the farmer said when his horse died "Gee he never did that before".
What other 110 story building of external skeleton construction,on fire from having a jet plane crashed into it are they comparing it to.
Completely and utterly idiotic.Some levels of stupidity should be made criminal.
23 posted on
06/14/2005 3:34:32 PM PDT by
carlr
To: Matrix1948
And I would take teh word of an economist about demolitions, ballistics and damage assessment why?
24 posted on
06/14/2005 3:36:50 PM PDT by
AzSteven
To: Matrix1948
|
Those jets didn't look airbrushed to me... What's your opinion of the article, Matrix1948, or are those just Baby Ruth's you dropped into the punchbowl?
|
25 posted on
06/14/2005 3:37:35 PM PDT by
glock rocks
( There are not enough liberals in Utah to bother to appease. - Warren Keuffel)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson