Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Janice Rogers Brown Nails the Marxists - (she dared say it! NY Times & liberals aghast!)
NEWSMAX.COM ^ | JUNE 15, 2005 | PHIL BRENNAN

Posted on 06/14/2005 2:58:16 PM PDT by CHARLITE

Goodness gracious, she dared say it and the New York Times – the voice of collectivism in the U.S. – and all its Marxist allies are aghast. An appointee to the federal judiciary, no less, dared to describe the New Deal for what it was: a socialist revolution.

For this egregious offense she must be pilloried and cast into the outer darkness inhabited by those who offend the mighty Times, whose omniscience must never be questioned and before whom all right-thinking Americans must cower in humble obeisance.

In retribution for her lese majeste, Justice Janice Rogers Brown – now, by the grace of God, President Bush and a small majority of United States senators, a member of the Federal Court of Appeals in the District of Columbia – has been subjected to a campaign of slander and misrepresentation by the Times and a motley crew of Marxist groups fearful that Justice Brown and her like-minded colleagues will work to undo decades of judicial misrule they aided and abetted.

In October 2003, when Justice Brown was first nominated by President Bush, the Times went berserk, writing that "of the many unworthy judicial nominees President Bush has put forward, Janice Rogers Brown is among the very worst."

The daughter of a black sharecropper in the deep South is, in the Times' view, "an archconservative justice on the California Supreme Court, [who] "has declared war on the mainstream [read Marxist] legal values" the Blue State Times in its deep understanding of our Red State values tells us "most Americans hold dear."

Shockingly, Janice Rogers Brown lets "ideology be her guide in deciding cases and has "made it clear in her public pronouncements how extreme her views are." To wit: She "attacked the New Deal, which gave us Social Security and other programs now central to American life, as 'the triumph of our socialist revolution.'"

Writing in the Pittsburgh Tribune Review, columnist Colin McNickle took a look at a recent Times story by one David D. Kirkpatrick about Justice Brown mockingly headlined "Seeing slavery in liberalism."

McNickle noted that the Times quoted Brown as remarking:

"In the heyday of liberal democracy, all roads lead to slavery."

"We no longer find slavery abhorrent. We embrace it."

"If we can invoke no ultimate limits on the power of government, a democracy is inevitably transformed into a kleptocracy – a license to steal, a warrant for oppression."

Wrote McNickle, "In the first two quotes, Rogers Brown obviously is talking about how liberal social policies foster not independence but dependence and how they usually have the exact opposite effect of their promoter's 'beneficent' purposes.

"In the third quote, she's obviously talking about government as a maniacal Leviathan, and a leviathan with no constitutional warrant for most of what it does.

"Yet, Kirkpatrick quickly notes, these are precepts that liberals cited as examples of Rogers Brown's 'extremism.'

"How instructive. How sad. How frightening. Some of the fundamental building blocks of our constitutional republic are considered 'extreme' by Democrats and their liberal moneybags."

McNickle goes on to provide more extensive quotes, supplied by one William Anderson, "that had turned apoplectic the 'progressives' (i.e., socialists) at People for the American Way."

Said Brown:

"I have argued that collectivism was (and is) fundamentally incompatible with the vision that undergirded this country's founding. The New Deal, however, inoculated the federal Constitution with a kind of underground collectivist mentality. The Constitution itself was transmuted into a significantly different document."

"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit."

"Where government advances – and it advances relentlessly – freedom is imperiled; community impoverished; religion marginalized and civilization itself jeopardized. ... When did government cease to be a necessary evil and become a goody bag to solve our private problems?"

"Government acts as a giant siphon, extracting wealth, creating privilege and power, and redistributing it."

And, finally, the complete second slavery quote that was truncated by The Times:

"[W]e no longer find slavery abhorrent. We embrace it. We demand more. Big government is not just the opiate of the masses. It is the opiate. The drug of choice for multinational corporations and single moms; for regulated industries and rugged Midwestern farmers and militant senior citizens."

Were James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and George Washington present to hear such words, they would have given Janice Rogers Brown a standing ovation. They would have been proud of what amounted to a ringing defense of the principles embedded in the Constitution they gave us – the document the Marxists realize that, as originally written, stands between them and the socialist government they want to impose on us.

Make no mistake about it, the issue of Janice Rogers Brown and her fellow constitutionalist jurists is the issue that America faces at this crucial moment in our history. It is not one of Republicans vs. Democrats, or so-called liberals vs. conservatives.

It is instead a matter of constitutional freedom vs. Marxist oppression. There is no longer a national Democratic Party dedicated to the preservation of the liberties guaranteed to all Americans by the Constitution as written by our Founding Fathers. In its place is the National Democrat Socialist Abortion Party (NSDAP) – a party now dominated by the modern-day disciples of Karl Marx and Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (aka Nicolai Lenin) and devotees of some of the methods of Joseph Vissarionovitch Djugashvili (aka Josef Stalin), such as lying about and slandering opponents and distorting their programs and issues.

(Stalin would have roared approval of the NSDAP's slanderous attacks on John Bolton.)

The whole agenda of the NSDAP is a socialist agenda, one to which Karl Marx and his allies would give a standing ovation were they to attend a gathering of the near-manic Deaniacs who today dominate the party.

Americans need to be alarmed about this. Over the past couple of centuries tens of millions of our fellow humans have been murdered in the name of socialism. In the Soviet Union, National Socialist (Nazi) Germany, Cuba and China, the firing squads were kept busy building workers' paradises. Socialism by its very nature is coercive – people don't willingly surrender their God-given liberties to dictatorial states. In the name of "social justice" they must be forced to obey Big Brother.

As the old joke told by the inmates of the Soviet workers' paradise went, "Under Socialism you will all eat strawberries and cream." To those who protested that they did not want to eat strawberries and cream, the response was "You will eat strawberries and cream and like it. Or else."

Janice Rogers Brown recognizes the deadly toxicity of socialism's diet of strawberries and cream and its caterers, such as the New York Times, who despise and fear her for her faithfulness to the magnificent vision of the Founding Fathers and the liberties they bequeathed us.

* * * * * * Phil Brennan is a veteran journalist who writes for NewsMax.com. He is editor & publisher of Wednesday on the Web (http://www.pvbr.com) and was Washington columnist for National Review magazine in the 1960s. He also served as a staff aide for the House Republican Policy Committee and helped handle the Washington public relations operation for the Alaska Statehood Committee which won statehood for Alaska. He is also a trustee of the Lincoln Heritage Institute and a member of the Association of Former Intelligence Officers.

He can be reached at phil@newsmax.com


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: brown; fdr; janicerogers; janicerogersbrown; marxism; newdeal; speech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

1 posted on 06/14/2005 2:58:17 PM PDT by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

WOW, boy am I glad her muzzle is off.


2 posted on 06/14/2005 3:00:53 PM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude; Beth528; SMARTY; Ghost of Philip Marlowe; CyberAnt; nothingnew; Cornpone; ...
Ping for your interest.

Char :)

3 posted on 06/14/2005 3:01:06 PM PDT by CHARLITE (I propose a co-Clinton team as permanent reps to Pyonyang, w/out possibility of repatriation....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

She is one smart lady who speaketh the truth. And the "truth" is one thing the libs can't stand........


4 posted on 06/14/2005 3:04:58 PM PDT by GeorgeW23225 (Liberals really aren*t bad people. It*s just that they know so much that simply ISN*T true!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
I heard some of her comments earlier today on the radio from another article. It may have been posted here, if not HERE IT IS

Janice Rogers Brown for supreme court? Hell no!! Janice Rogers Brown for President!

5 posted on 06/14/2005 3:05:31 PM PDT by infidel29 ("It is only the warlike power of a civilized people that can give peace to the world."- T. Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

I guess I should have read the whole thing before posting that link....DUH!


6 posted on 06/14/2005 3:06:32 PM PDT by infidel29 ("It is only the warlike power of a civilized people that can give peace to the world."- T. Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Awesome! She is AMAZING! This was worth every second of the two year wait.


7 posted on 06/14/2005 3:06:36 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember (Honoring Saint Jude's assistance every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Considering the NYTimes track record of supporting and defending communism, communists and communist spies (as so brilliantly described by Ann Coulter in "Treason"), they have a lot to worry about.

I guess their love of communism trumps their alleged support of the upward mobility of blacks.


8 posted on 06/14/2005 3:07:15 PM PDT by SpinyNorman (Liberals are enablers for terrorists and other anti-American groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

It was Charles Schumer who first called New Deal policies socialist in a beautiful freudian slip while grilling Ms. Brown for her judicial appointment and accusing her of "turning back our socialist agenda..." or something similar.


9 posted on 06/14/2005 3:07:24 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE; Noumenon; Lurker; joanie-f; Minuteman23; MileHi; Grampa Dave; Dukie
"Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit."

"Where government advances – and it advances relentlessly – freedom is imperiled; community impoverished; religion marginalized and civilization itself jeopardized. ... When did government cease to be a necessary evil and become a goody bag to solve our private problems?"
I'd say Judge Brown gets it.
10 posted on 06/14/2005 3:08:01 PM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeW23225

The truth is to liberals as the light is to cockroaches.


11 posted on 06/14/2005 3:10:04 PM PDT by Stonedog (I don't know what your problem is, but I bet it's difficult to pronounce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marty60
No, she said all this awhile ago - it is what got her nomination filibustered. Now she is on the ladder to the SCOTUS and not a moment too soon. Let's hope that she gets a few of those cases that make her a household name for people with commonsense - say a parental rights or voter rights case, which lays bare the underbelly of the all knowing, all consuming, all powerful state bureaucrats.
12 posted on 06/14/2005 3:11:01 PM PDT by bjc (Check the data!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE; ken5050; Ernest_at_the_Beach

Judge Brown will be a great judge in her newly appointed and approved role.

Then, one day she can be on the Supreme Court. That will drive the left wing haters of America, aka, the Rat party into complete and total insanity.


13 posted on 06/14/2005 3:11:21 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (The MSM has been a WMD, Weapon of Mass Disinformation for the Rats for at least 5 decades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marty60

Those of you in the rest of the Country are very welcome.

We in California are missing an outstanding State Supreme Court Justice.


14 posted on 06/14/2005 3:11:31 PM PDT by SmithL (Proud Submariner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Thanks for the ping. The rats are probably more scared of Judge Brown than they are scared of GW.


15 posted on 06/14/2005 3:12:34 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (The MSM has been a WMD, Weapon of Mass Disinformation for the Rats for at least 5 decades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: marty60

Long live Judge Brown.


16 posted on 06/14/2005 3:13:49 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Spec.4 Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
"It is instead a matter of constitutional freedom vs. Marxist oppression. There is no longer a national Democratic Party dedicated to the preservation of the liberties guaranteed to all Americans by the Constitution as written by our Founding Fathers."

More importantly, is there a "Republican Party dedicated to the preservation of the liberties guaranteed to all Americans..."

I fear there is not.

17 posted on 06/14/2005 3:14:47 PM PDT by tahiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stonedog

Ah yes, liberals, cockroaches...six of one, half a dozen of the other...


18 posted on 06/14/2005 3:15:21 PM PDT by infidel dog (nearer my God to thee....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
She's going to be there a long time...be great to have her adn Clarance Thomas on the Supreme Court. LOL A liberal/marxist nightmare.
19 posted on 06/14/2005 3:15:26 PM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

President of the United States Janis Rodgers Brown 2008 Vice President of the United States Condi Rice 2008 now there is a team that CAN"T BE BEAT!!!


20 posted on 06/14/2005 3:15:33 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 (My ? to Libs: "Do they ever shut up on your planet?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson