[teenyelliott]

Whatever. I'm sure you are right, and everyone on any jury who makes a decision YOU don't agree with is an idiot.

[Random Nonsense]

yes, in my opinion, those jurors in Michael Jackson case are bunch of idiots by acquiting MJ on all accounts

[drpix]

Here's just a few QUESTIONS for the Jacko defenders about his selection criteria for "sleepovers":

Why no girls?
Why only boys in a narrow age range?
Why no groups of boys but only one at a time?
Why no black boys?
Why did he appear naked before the selected boys?
Why did he allow booze and porno to be available for these boys?
WHY? WHY? WHY?......


CLUES:

It was not because of a humanitarian love for needy children.
It was not because of the innocent love of an adult lost soul who thought he was a child.
It was not because of any similarly "charming" feelings of compassion or charity.

ANSWER:

IT WAS BECAUSE OF THE PHYSICAL SEXUAL ATTRACTION OF A DEPRAVED FORTY YEAR OLD ADULT MAN FOR CERTAIN TYPES OF YOUNG BOYS.

[Fierce Allegiance]

He may have been found not guilty, but he's not innocent.