He may have been found not guilty, but he's not innocent.
What I do know is that the accusers family has tried to extort many people, many times. So, none of their claims, let alone their testimony, are credible, IMO.
What I do know is that at the very least, MJ is a big frickin weirdo. Any any parent who would let their kid anywhere near him is, in the end, out for money.
Was there any testimony against Jackson in this case from anyone who did not stand to gain monetarily? There were plenty of people who testified that things were not as the accusers family described. Why does their version hold no water in your opinion?
The jury is duty bound to not consider anything that has happened, been reported, or been alleged in the past. Only this case, and the evidence presented, are to be taken into account.