Skip to comments.
New 'Downing Street Memo' says Bush, Blair agreed on 'regime change' in 2002
SF Gate ^
| 6/14/05
Posted on 06/14/2005 7:41:25 AM PDT by areafiftyone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
To: All
I don't think we Republicans should ignore this blatent attempt by the media and the Leftists to bring down Bush. We need to fight this!
2
posted on
06/14/2005 7:42:55 AM PDT
by
areafiftyone
(Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
To: areafiftyone
It's a briefing paper? That would mean it is someone's view of the facts (or opinion) being given to his superiors. That isn't proof of anything.
3
posted on
06/14/2005 7:44:15 AM PDT
by
bnelson44
To: areafiftyone
Hasn't regime change been the policy of the United States since 1998?
Do these morans take us for morons?
4
posted on
06/14/2005 7:44:35 AM PDT
by
Duke Nukum
(Fiery the Angels rose & as they rose deep thunder roll'd around their shores)
To: areafiftyone
What is the "United Nations"?
5
posted on
06/14/2005 7:44:37 AM PDT
by
Dallas59
(" I have a great team that is going to beat George W. Bush" John Kerry -2004)
To: areafiftyone
showed that the prime minister had known, some eight months before the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, that a war not authorized by the United Nations would be illegal for British troops to take part in. Like this makes a lick of sense, given that Blair and Clinton bombed Kosovo and Serbia without UN approval.
6
posted on
06/14/2005 7:44:37 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Drool overflowed my buffer...)
To: areafiftyone
Wasn't "regime change" the official policy of the United States ever since 1994 or around there?
7
posted on
06/14/2005 7:45:00 AM PDT
by
rhc2000
To: areafiftyone
LET'S SEE THE ACTUAL DOCS.
8
posted on
06/14/2005 7:45:04 AM PDT
by
marty60
To: areafiftyone
This propaganda has already been discredited, even before it started. The British legal adviser said that although a UN resolution gave some legal justification, it was several years old, which put it into question. So they went back to the UN and got a new resolution.
The administration won't get bogged down in arguing over this, so it's up to the internet to straighten it out.
9
posted on
06/14/2005 7:46:10 AM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: areafiftyone
...the now-infamous Downing Street Memo...Only with the DU and kindred spirits.
10
posted on
06/14/2005 7:46:20 AM PDT
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: areafiftyone
When one document does not provide the desired results, dig up or produce another document. SOP for the left wing press.
With Howard Dean the dems have formally graduated from "disarray" to "debacle", with "irretrievable disaster" just around the corner.
11
posted on
06/14/2005 7:46:36 AM PDT
by
speed_addiction
( Somethings gnaw on a man worse'n dyin'!)
To: areafiftyone
I don't think we Republicans should ignore this blatent attempt by the media and the Leftists to bring down BushNow there's another Downing Street Memo?
This attempt to bring down Bush and Blair has reached the point of parody. It looks contrived, and, frankly, nobody cares about it anymore.
The White House should say nothing more about any of this.
12
posted on
06/14/2005 7:47:00 AM PDT
by
sinkspur
(If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
To: areafiftyone
Authorization? What by a bunch of UNELECTED despots from tin horn dictatorships "authorizing"???
I don't care to be "authorized" by anyone the American electorate didn't "authorize"!
13
posted on
06/14/2005 7:47:03 AM PDT
by
Bob Eimiller
(Kerry, Kennedy, Pelosi, Leahy, Kucinich, Durbin Pro Abort Catholics Excommunication?)
To: marty60
LET'S SEE THE ACTUAL DOCS.Microsoft Word with British English default grammar being queued up as we speak...
14
posted on
06/14/2005 7:47:09 AM PDT
by
frogjerk
To: marty60
The doc was released and discussed yesterday or the day before on one of the blogs. There's a thread here somewhere. The actual text of the memo completely discredits this leftist propaganda.
15
posted on
06/14/2005 7:47:25 AM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: areafiftyone
I don't get it. What's the news in this supposed to be? Now they are gonna get in trouble for making sure it was legal??
16
posted on
06/14/2005 7:47:31 AM PDT
by
Huck
(One day the lion will lay down with the lamb; Until that day comes, I want America to be the lion.)
To: marty60; All
LET'S SEE THE ACTUAL DOCS. Go to RAW STORY for the documents. This is what the MSM is picking up.
17
posted on
06/14/2005 7:48:12 AM PDT
by
areafiftyone
(Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
To: areafiftyone
If you ignore them long enough, they go away.
18
posted on
06/14/2005 7:48:19 AM PDT
by
advance_copy
(Stand for life, or nothing at all)
To: areafiftyone
They're not real until both Dan Rather and Buckhead agree on them.
19
posted on
06/14/2005 7:48:48 AM PDT
by
Preachin'
(Georgia finally saw the light in 2000.)
To: areafiftyone
20
posted on
06/14/2005 7:49:11 AM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson