Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joking Pilots in Commuter Jet Crash Wanted to 'have a Little Fun' by Climbing to 41,000 Feet
AP ^ | AP-ES-06-13-05 1117EDT

Posted on 06/13/2005 8:45:15 AM PDT by TheOtherOne

Joking Pilots in Commuter Jet Crash Wanted to 'have a Little Fun' by Climbing to 41,000 Feet

By Leslie Miller Associated Press Writer
Published: Jun 13, 2005 WASHINGTON (AP) - Two pilots, in a jovial mood as they flew an empty commuter jet, wanted to "have a little fun" by taking the plane to an unusually high altitude last October, only to realize as the engines failed that they were not going to make it, according to transcripts released Monday.

The plane, which the two were ferrying from Little Rock, Ark. to Minneapolis, crashed and both Capt. Jesse Rhodes and First Officer Peter Cesarz perished.

The cockpit voice recording, released by the National Transportation Safety Board at the start of a three-day hearing into the Oct. 14, 2004 accident, revealed how the pilots cracked jokes and decided to "have a little fun" and fly to 41,000 feet - the maximum altitude for their 50-seat plane. Most commuter jets fly at lower altitudes.

"Man, we can do it, 41-it," said Cesarz at 9:48 p.m. A minute later, Rhodes said, "40 thousand, baby."

Two minutes later, "There's 41-0, my man," Cesarz said. "Made it, man."

At 9:52 p.m., one of the pilots popped a can of Pepsi and they joked about drinking beer. A minute later, Cesarz said, "This is the greatest thing, no way."

But at 10:03 p.m., the pilots reported their engine had failed. Five minutes later, they said both engines had failed and they wanted a direct route to any airport.

The transcript recounts their increasingly desperate efforts to restart the engines and regain altitude. They tried to land at the Jefferson City, Mo., airport but by 10:14 p.m., it was obvious they wouldn't reach it.

"We're not going to make it, man. We're not going to make it," Cesarz said. The plane crashed in a residential neighborhood of Jefferson City. No one was injured on the ground.

Accident investigators are examining how well the pilots were trained - a key safety question as the number of regional jets keeps growing.

The crash involved a Bombardier regional jet plane operated by Pinnacle Airlines, an affiliate of Northwest Airlines. Like many regional carriers, Pinnacle is growing rapidly as it teams up with a traditional network airline looking to offer more seats to more places.

Memphis, Tenn.-based Pinnacle grew by 700 percent in the past five years, according to Phil Reed, its marketing vice president. During that time, it switched its fleet from propeller-driven planes to small turbojets, known as regional jets, or RJs.

The number of regional jets rose to 1,630 last year from 570 in 2000, the Federal Aviation Administration says. The question of whether government safety inspectors can keep up with such rapid changes in the airline industry was raised last week in a Transportation Department inspector general's report.

Jet engines work differently at higher altitudes, and it's unclear whether the relatively inexperienced Pinnacle pilots were aware that they had to be more careful in the thin air at 41,000 feet, the maximum altitude for their plane.

According to FAA transcripts of air-to-ground conversations, an air traffic controller in Kansas City told the two pilots it was rare to see the plane flying that high.

"Yeah, we're actually ... we don't have any passengers on board, so we decided to have a little fun and come up here," one of the pilots said. The transcripts don't identify whether Jesse Rhodes or Cesarz made the statement.

First one, then the other engine shut down. The last contact that controllers had with the crew was at 9,000 feet, when the pilot reported an airport beacon in sight.

At the hearing, NTSB investigators plan to delve into the plane's flight limits and the proper recovery techniques when engines fail. They also want to know if the pilots knew those procedures and to learn the engine's performance characteristics at high altitudes.

On June 2, the FAA issued a special bulletin clarifying what steps pilots need to take to restart an engine when there's a dual engine failure, agency spokeswoman Laura Brown said.

David Stempler, president of the Air Travelers Association, said the issue may be reckless pilots rather than inadequate training or improper recovery procedures.

"This is more a story of pilots having time on their hands and playing with things in the cockpit that they shouldn't," he said.

Flying, he said, is as boring as truck driving most of the time.

"This was boredom and experimentation, these guys experimenting with things they had no business doing," Stempler said.

---

On the Net:

National Transportation Safety Board: http://www.ntsb.gov

AP-ES-06-13-05 1117EDT


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: faa; holdmuhbeer; pilot; plane; planecrash
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-231 next last
To: TheOtherOne

There are many old pilots, and there are many bold pilots. But there are not many old, bold pilots.


101 posted on 06/13/2005 10:31:20 AM PDT by TXBSAFH (One man's Linux is another man's OS/2.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary; safisoft
First thing to come to mind with multiple engine failure is fuel starvation, then FOD.

The engines failed at different altitudes, and probably dynamic pressure/EAS and Mach. At 41K, and no birds of volcanoes around, FOD seems unlikely. So, what happened to the Jet-A? A bad batch that jelled? Contamination, Ice??? Who knows.
102 posted on 06/13/2005 10:32:36 AM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

Comment #103 Removed by Moderator

To: SkyPilot

I think these guys were falling like a rock. It would be interesting to know if they had a military background or not. I'm betting not.


104 posted on 06/13/2005 10:33:51 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne

snip

The problem is first hinted at in the transcipts when an air traffic controller in Kansas City told the pilots it was was rare to see the plane flying at an altitude of 41,000 feet.

"Yeah, we’re actually . . . we don’t have any passengers on board, so we decided to have a little fun and come up here," one of the pilots said. The transcripts don’t identify whether Rhodes or Cesarz made the statement.

But the pilot soon told air traffic controllers that the CRJ2 wouldn’t remain at that altitude for long.

"I don’t think he had enough gas up there; he was so slow," one air traffic controller said.

The transcripts then describe the conversations between the pilots and the air traffic controllers as the first engine loses power followed by the second engine at 13,000 feet.

"We’re going to need a little lower to start this other engine up, so we’re going to go down to about 12 or 11. Is that cool?" the pilot asked.

A few moments later, he reported double engine failure, according to the transcripts.

The last contact that air traffic controllers had with the plane was at 9,000 feet, when the pilot reported an airport beacon in sight.

Earlier that day, the jet had aborted a scheduled flight with passengers from Little Rock, Ark., after an indicator light went on for part of its bleed-air system. The system pulls hot, compressed air from the engines to heat other components of the plane.

An airplane indicator light signaled a potential problem with the bleed-air sensing loop, which uses heat to determine whether air is leaking from the engine.

The plane’s loop was replaced before it took off for Minneapolis with just the crew.


http://tinyurl.com/ckjd4


105 posted on 06/13/2005 10:35:25 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dashing Dasher

I started in a C-152, then transitioned to a T-Craft before I knew any better. I hope not too much brain damage was done by the nosewheel...but you never know.


106 posted on 06/13/2005 10:36:02 AM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Dead Dog

You can be healed.

;-)


107 posted on 06/13/2005 10:38:29 AM PDT by Dashing Dasher (To laugh often and much; to win the respect of intelligent people and the affection of FReepers...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
I'm thinking mechanical flaw as well. it's darn cold up there, so when you loose the flame that thing cools down rapidly from internal operating temps to -60 in seconds. different metals shrink at different rates, bearings and bushings can seize Any engineering flaws will show up in a hurry.

Good thoughts. Engine flame out at high altitudes do not normally preclude restart. Normally, the only consideration is that they won't start until you get somewhere below 29,000 on most aircraft (air density for windmilling starts). Some aircraft permit APU assisted, but most of those still have limits that the APU cannot produce the needed PSI at altitude. Bottom line, when they got below 29,000, in most aircraft they should have been able to start.

Another problem can be fuel cavitation - and that can cause a type of vapor lock - in which case descending won't necessarily help. Regardless, they had LOTS of time in the descent from FL410. Likely 15 to 20 minutes at the least.
108 posted on 06/13/2005 10:40:54 AM PDT by safisoft (Give me Torah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
The problem is first hinted at in the transcipts when an air traffic controller in Kansas City told the pilots it was was rare to see the plane flying at an altitude of 41,000 feet.

Maybe not Canadairs, but there are lots of people up at FL410.
109 posted on 06/13/2005 10:42:51 AM PDT by safisoft (Give me Torah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

See that? I told you that you fighter pilots had no clue!!


heh heh heh....


110 posted on 06/13/2005 10:46:05 AM PDT by Tennessee_Bob (The Crew Chief's Toolbox: A roll around cabinet full of specialists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Dashing Dasher

I don't know about him - but I've been called "ruggedly handsome."

Personally, I think I look a little like Mel Gibson - after a bad motorcycle accident...


111 posted on 06/13/2005 10:47:12 AM PDT by Tennessee_Bob (The Crew Chief's Toolbox: A roll around cabinet full of specialists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob
Like in the movie...


112 posted on 06/13/2005 10:53:27 AM PDT by Dashing Dasher (To laugh often and much; to win the respect of intelligent people and the affection of FReepers...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Dashing Dasher

Heck - I don't look that good!!!


113 posted on 06/13/2005 11:01:05 AM PDT by Tennessee_Bob (The Crew Chief's Toolbox: A roll around cabinet full of specialists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: safisoft

dudes -- settle down, please.

http://www.aerospaceweb.org/aircraft/jetliner/b777/ <-- will tell you that the service ceiling of a triple 7 is just over 43,000 feet. But there is a union reason AND a flight safety/procedure reason why commercial passenger aircraft rarely go to FL 410. Exec jets bust FL410 all the time, but not so much the Boeings.

The trash haulers here on FR can tell you why (it has to do with deep, long-lasting marks on the First Officers' faces ;-) )


114 posted on 06/13/2005 11:07:19 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Dashing Dasher

A B 36 would fly above FL 410 but you could not start anything up there. The J 47 jets would work well up there but there is very little air up thre. The recips would work well if they were running with 2 turbo blowers for each engine.


115 posted on 06/13/2005 11:08:54 AM PDT by southland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

I doubt they had a military background also. Pilots who have not been in the military generally are not trained as well as the military trains especially the Air Force.
Class 56H Air Force.


116 posted on 06/13/2005 11:12:13 AM PDT by southland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
The AV Web article indicated the plane had been serviced subsequent to a bleed air circuit indicator light illumination.

Bleed air is nothing more than air that has been compressed by one or more of the compressor stages of a turbine engine. Bleed air is hot, as a result of being compressed. The more compressor stages that have compressed the bleed air, the higher the temperature and pressure will be.

In most turbine powered aircraft, bleed air is used for pressurization, air conditioning, engine anti-ice, windshield anti-ice, de-ice boot inflation, to power a venturi system, (creates vacuum to control outflow valves and power gyroscopic instruments), and on some aircraft, to anti-ice the wing and tail. When bleed air is extracted from an engine, some power loss will result. When operating bleed air powered wing heat, engine, or windshield anti-ice systems, aircraft performance and engine power settings will change and some loss of performance will result.

There are bleed valves on some turbine engines that serve only to improve the engine's idle and acceleration characteristics. These valves operate pretty much automatically, and are of little concern to the pilot unless they malfunction. A malfunctioning bleed-air circuit can cause unstable idle RPM, or compressor stall.

In flight engine restart difficulties could be compounded by several factors, icing of the air-bleed circuitry, and operational paramaters of the engine. The latter may be a safeguard designed into the engine so that the blades don't overheat. Air is bleed off from the compressor, run it down the shaft, and blown through the middle of hollow turbine blades. If the air-bleed circuit is faulty (or obstructed), the compressor's rotation may be governor limited.

The first type of compressor stall, the less severe type of stall, is the "axis-symmetric stall", is a straightforward expulsion of air out the intake due to the compressor's inability to maintain pressure on the combustion chamber.

In the second, more-severe "rotational stall", the air flow disruption of the stall causes standing pockets of air to rotate within the compressor without moving along the axis. Without fresh air from the intake passing over the stalled compressor vanes they overheat, causing accelerated engine wear and possible damage.

The most likely cause of a compressor stall is a sudden change in the pressure differential between the intake and combustion chamber. Jet aircraft pilots must take this into account when dropping airspeed or increasing throttle.

Flying through a cloud of ice crystals at max altitude, or while attempting an in-flight engine restart (in conjunction with an existing air-bleed circuit malfunction) could result in some problems for pilots.

Proper fuel flow is very important in a gas turbine engine. Unlike an engine with a carburetor, the amount of air flowing into a jet engine is not regulated. Jet engines suck in whatever air is available. Engine power is controlled by the amount of fuel that enters the engine's combustion chamber. At sea level, only about 25% of the air entering the engine is burned. The other 75% just flows through the engine, absorbs heat and provides mass to be routed through the turbines. The proper fuel flow for a given engine RPM varies with altitude.

In general, the proper fuel flow for a given situation depends on the following:

The above parameters are the data the fuel control uses to decide how much fuel is delivered to the combustion chamber. The amount of fuel the engine gets for a given set of circumstances is called the "Fuel Schedule". Engine starting phase has it's own fuel schedule. All this would be just a bit much for a pilot to consider while attempting to keep the airplane right side up. Abrupt thrust lever (throttle) changes or improper fuel flow might cause excessive engine temperatures, or even an engine flameout due to excessive or insufficient fuel flow. Engine starting would be much more a function of technique, thus more prone to pilot induced errors. And so fuel control is done with a hydro mechanical device that regulates the amount of fuel the engine receives and a fuel control computer.

The result of all this is that the pilot merely tells the fuel control unit how much thrust is desired by moving the thrust lever. The fuel control delivers the proper amount of fuel to the combustion chamber for optimum operation of the engine according to the parameters observed at the time. The point of all this: the air-bleed can become an extremely critical factor for proper engine operation at max altitude or during in-flight engine restarts and its failure may well be implicated in this crash.

117 posted on 06/13/2005 11:18:03 AM PDT by raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: raygun

Great Post!

Wouldn't there be independent circuits per engine. ie. system separation?


118 posted on 06/13/2005 11:31:37 AM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag
But there is a union reason AND a flight safety/procedure reason why commercial passenger aircraft rarely go to FL 410.

I am not sure what you mean by a 'union' reason. I am ALPA, and it does not dictate operating practices at various airlines.
119 posted on 06/13/2005 11:36:11 AM PDT by safisoft (Give me Torah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob

Yeah, but your personality makes you a hunk, right!


120 posted on 06/13/2005 11:41:03 AM PDT by Dashing Dasher (To laugh often and much; to win the respect of intelligent people and the affection of FReepers...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-231 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson