[Alamo-Girl]

Thank you so much for all of your encouragements!!!

I see that you've described and defined it but did not see you address it's origin.

At the moment there is no known source for information (successful communication) in the universe. Some of the candidates being explored include fields, geometry, harmonics. That leads directly into alternative cosmologies and additionally (or alternatively) may suggest an intelligent cause - a fractal or emergent property relating to consciousness - and most especially because all cosmologies require a beginning, an uncaused cause, God.

[jwalsh07]

"...and most especially because all cosmologies require a beginning, an uncaused cause, God."

Well, mine does at any rate. :-}

Have a good day.

[Ichneumon]

At the moment there is no known source for information (successful communication) in the universe.

Utter and complete nonsense. Natural selection, among many other processes, is such a source. People need to learn the basics of a topic before they attempt to "contribute" to it.

It never ceases to amaze me how many creationists (yes, that's right, I used the "C" word) try to critique evolutionary biology without actually understanding the most elementary things about it. Most of the "gaps" they try to "fill" with creationism aren't even gaps at all -- it's just their own misunderstandings about it.