Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES
1776 | The Founding Fathers

Posted on 06/13/2005 7:29:51 AM PDT by TheOtherOne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: An.American.Expatriate
"Hamilton SPECIFICALLY warned against a "Bill of Rights", stating, in essence, that by explicitly stating that the Congress shall pass no law... that this would be perversely construed to mean that the Congress WOULD have had that power had that amemdment not been included!!

I believe that James Madison, who wrote the amendments, agreed with Hamilton on that. That we would think the "Bill of Rights" were our only rights. In fact, that is exactly what most of us now do think. I hate to think how many times I have seen a post by a freeper stating that this right or that right is not spelled out in the Constitution, as if we are limited to the rights spelled out in the first 10 amendments.

Or conversely, how many times does one see posts arguing that our government is not prohibited from doing this or doing that, so it must be legal.

When in fact, our government is limited to the powers enumerated, while our freedom is unlimited, restricted only by those laws which our society has found necessary.

61 posted on 06/13/2005 9:52:40 AM PDT by Sam Cree (I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

It seems to give states immunity from federal lawsuits, or from lawsuits using federal law. Last year, two men in Florida sued a state university citing age discrimination. The age discrimination law was federal, and the university claimed immunity under the 11th Amendment. The judge agreed and threw the case out.


62 posted on 06/13/2005 9:56:05 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

To: TheOtherOne

You need to find a new source. Your constitution is an amendment short.


64 posted on 06/13/2005 10:09:18 AM PDT by Melas (Lives in state of disbelief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melas

mea culpa

http://www.house.gov/Constitution/Constitution.html


65 posted on 06/13/2005 10:10:38 AM PDT by TheOtherOne (I often sacrifice my spelling on the alter of speed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething
What they put into the Constitution was so simple and clear,

Simple and clear are beautiful words that most dismiss as ignorance and stupidity, as they do not allow for the prattling of the "intellectual elite" to use 15 letter words, that most have never heard of, in 10,000 word commentaries, that once uttered, render said rhetoric ineffective, as they fail to corroborate the essence of their thesis. I think ;*)

I really can't understand why it's become so muddied.

All the better to "alter" the original intent such as those posted in #46.

66 posted on 06/13/2005 10:24:18 AM PDT by Just A Nobody (I - L O V E - my attitude problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne

Ever notice how many people seem to think that "Give us your tired, your poor...." is part of the Constitution or the Declaration of Independence.


67 posted on 06/13/2005 10:24:20 AM PDT by AnOldCowhand (The west is dead. You may lose a sweetheart, but you will never forget her - Charles Russell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An.American.Expatriate

the anti-federalists were also very prescient


68 posted on 06/13/2005 10:25:01 AM PDT by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: AnOldCowhand
Ever notice how many people seem to think that "Give us your tired, your poor...." is part of the Constitution or the Declaration of Independence.
69 posted on 06/13/2005 10:35:19 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: AnOldCowhand
Ever notice how many people seem to think that "Give us your tired, your poor...." is part of the Constitution or the Declaration of Independence.

. Everyone knows that is part of the LA Clippers draft guidelines.

70 posted on 06/13/2005 10:35:40 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Everyone knows that is part of the LA Clippers draft guidelines.

That explains the new ending: "....your huddled masses and criminal element..."

71 posted on 06/13/2005 10:38:57 AM PDT by AnOldCowhand (The west is dead. You may lose a sweetheart, but you will never forget her - Charles Russell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne

BTTT


72 posted on 06/13/2005 10:40:25 AM PDT by EdReform (Free Republic - helping to keep our country a free republic. Thank you for your financial support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnOldCowhand
"Give us your tired, your poor...."

Yes, ingnorance scares me.

Emma Lazarus...'founding mother' who knew.

73 posted on 06/13/2005 10:44:52 AM PDT by TheOtherOne (I often sacrifice my spelling on the alter of speed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne
Emma Lazarus...'founding mother' who knew.

Wasn't that Baby Spice of the Spice Girls?

74 posted on 06/13/2005 10:49:57 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Man, you're not going to bait me into turning my Constitution thread into a chick photo thread. Are you?
75 posted on 06/13/2005 10:51:21 AM PDT by TheOtherOne (I often sacrifice my spelling on the alter of speed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: agitator; LS
the anti-federalists were also very prescient

Do you mean the original anti-federalists, the Nationalists, or do you mean the federalists that the anti-federalist started calling the anti-federalists and then themselves the federalists?

76 posted on 06/13/2005 10:52:35 AM PDT by eyespysomething (Peace - that brief moment in history where everyone stands around reloading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ops33
Under the Articles of Confederation, it states that any changes made had to be unanimous.

No one ever claimed that adoption of the Constitution was consistent with the Articles of Confederation. That wasn't the point. We ditched the AofC, just as we ditched tbe British Crown.

77 posted on 06/13/2005 10:55:36 AM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Thomas Jefferson II
Reading the Constitution again made me tear up. Here are some passionate quotes regarding our constitution:

"I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag" - Craig Washington

"I also wish that the Pledge of Allegiance were directed at the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, as it is when the President takes his oath of office, rather than to the flag and the nation" - Carl Sagan

"The principles of a free constitution are irrecoverably lost, when the legislative power is nominated by the executive" - Edward Gibbon

"If the 1st Amendment means anything, it means that a state has no business telling a man, sitting alone in his own house, what books he may read or what films he may watch." -Thurgood Marshall

"Our Constitution was not written in the sands to be washed away by each wave of new judges blown in by each successive political wind." -Hugo Black

"Since when is "public safety" the root password to the Constitution?" - C.D. Tavares

"The government was set to protect man from criminals, and the Constitution was written to protect man from the government." -Ayn Rand

"The Framers [of the Constitution] knew that free speech is the friend of change and revolution. But they also knew that it is always the deadliest enemy of tyranny." -Hugo Black

"Even where Congress has the authority under the Constitution to pass laws requiring or prohibiting certain acts, it lacks the power directly to compel the States to require or prohibit those acts." -Supreme Court

78 posted on 06/13/2005 10:56:29 AM PDT by to_zion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne
Does John Locke Matter?


John Locke

John Locke (b. 1632, d. 1704)


http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke/
79 posted on 06/13/2005 11:12:08 AM PDT by ChadGore (VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore

Sure he matters. I see your John Locke and raise you a John Milton.

http://www.bartleby.com/3/3/1.html


80 posted on 06/13/2005 11:16:52 AM PDT by TheOtherOne (I often sacrifice my spelling on the alter of speed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson