Replies

TWO of the saboteurs in Quirin claimed to be US citizens. One of them, Bruno Haupt, clearly was, having been born in Chicago. The unanimous SCt decision against them was NOT based on whether they came by submarine, nor whether they landed in German uniforms. (All were in civilian clothes, when captured.)

Those saboteurs were deemed "illegal combatants" and subject to trial and execution because of their plans to sabotage American plants, and because they had materials including maps and money, to carry those out. When you get into the relevant facts, Padilla is identical to Quirin.

Also, you are not up to speed on legal representation respectively for the 1942 saboteurs compared to Padilla, today. Padilla has already received more attention from lawyers (mostly military ones) and courts, than the saboteurs did all the way from their arrest to their executions.

Padilla is not a tough case at all. Unless the SCt is willing to throw out its own, prior, unanimous decision, Padilla loses. It's as simple as that.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "Gitmo In, Gitmo Out?"