Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Taking aim at Sen. Clinton [“Because she's a woman.”]
Washington Post ^ | Jun. 12, 2005 | Marie Cocco

Posted on 06/12/2005 6:31:54 AM PDT by johnny7

Edited on 06/12/2005 6:34:56 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]

WASHINGTON - There's nothing like the prospect of a good catfight to get the Cheney family blood flowing.

The vice president and his wife, Lynne, entertained themselves recently by publicly conjuring up the possibility of a Laura Bush vs. Hillary Clinton presidential showdown. "You know, people are thinking of Mrs. Clinton running for president," Lynne Cheney commented during an appearance on CNN's Larry King Live. "I think Mrs. Bush ought to run for president. If we want to have a Bush dynasty, let's get Laura Bush." Her husband, not one to shrink from a kneecapping, offered a prognosis. "It's a great idea," Dick Cheney said. "And I think I know who would win, too."


(Excerpt) Read more at dfw.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: laura2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
Hillary... the 'victim'? Funny... I see her more as an 'accessory-to- treason'.
1 posted on 06/12/2005 6:31:55 AM PDT by johnny7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Taking aim at Sen. Clinton [“Because she's a woman.”]

It is [a woman]?!?
2 posted on 06/12/2005 6:32:43 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (10,000 posts by 29 June!!! 9,826 or so replies and counting....Getting Closer!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Hillary Clinton....Taking Aim..

Hey, Vince... Bang!

3 posted on 06/12/2005 6:34:31 AM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
For the first time in national polling, a slim majority of registered voters tells Gallup that they would be "very" or "somewhat" likely to vote for Clinton in the 2008 presidential contest.

Someone tell me this is a lie!!!

4 posted on 06/12/2005 6:34:32 AM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

And so it begins.

Are you all prepared for the endless MSM drumbeat of Hillary for President?


5 posted on 06/12/2005 6:36:39 AM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
Ask the Likely voters the same question and let's see how those numbers come in.
6 posted on 06/12/2005 6:36:40 AM PDT by Thebaddog (Dawgs off the coffee table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

Ask Zogby.


7 posted on 06/12/2005 6:38:09 AM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
It reduces Hillary Rodham Clinton to the status of former first lady, a woman holding no portfolio of her own. It belittles her accomplishment in becoming the first presidential spouse to attain high public office in her own right. It discounts her status as sitting senator from the nation's third-largest state,

oh, PULLEEEEEZ! the real issue is that hillary's personality is so shrill and piercing and brittle that the American public could not TAKE her in the driver's seat!

juxtaposing her with first LADY laura bush only accentuates the difference! of course, everyone knows laura bush has no political aspirations yet has emerged as a character of strength without shrillness, much like condoleezza.

8 posted on 06/12/2005 6:40:01 AM PDT by wildwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

"Taking aim at Sen. Clinton [“Because she's a woman.”]"

We'll be hearing a lot more about that. I still remember how the MSM portrayed her as a "victim" because Rick Lazio pointed near her face during their debate in 2000. Any male candidate is going to be chastised for calling her to task.


9 posted on 06/12/2005 6:41:33 AM PDT by nj26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog; madprof98; johnny7

<< Ask the Likely voters the same question and let's see how those numbers come in. >>

Comes in around 30% would consider and 48% NEVER would.


10 posted on 06/12/2005 6:41:38 AM PDT by Brian Allen (I fly and need therefore envy no Earth Person! -- Per Ardua ad Astra!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

Oh lovely. Just think of those white-rimmed eyeballs glaring out of your TV as Prez Hill lectures us for opposing higher taxes. Too much.


11 posted on 06/12/2005 6:41:41 AM PDT by elcid1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Pathetic. That's why feminists torque me so badly. I'm all in favor of letting women compete with men professionally. Provided that they are also held equally accountable. Claiming gender discrimination the first time Hitlery hits a rough patch is not equal consequences. She should not be allowed to compete like a man until she is expected to take it on the chin like one.
12 posted on 06/12/2005 6:43:44 AM PDT by .cnI redruM ("There is no virtue in compulsory government charity, and there is no virtue in advocating it.-PJ O')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nj26

Oh, lovely. Just think, those wild, white-rimmed eyeballs glaring out of your TV set as Prez Hill lectures us all for opposing higher taxes. Just too much.


13 posted on 06/12/2005 6:44:09 AM PDT by elcid1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Because she's a woman

No,Miss Cocco....it's because she a Millionaire Maoist and a felon.

14 posted on 06/12/2005 6:44:10 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

"Because she's a woman.." You know gang, this turning out to be easier than anyone could have hoped for. Every time it seems that the ratmedia has hit stupidity rock bottom and we think they can't dream up another rediculous line of thought to support the rats, bam! they reach down into the stupidest parts of their small brains and stoke the fires some more.


15 posted on 06/12/2005 6:45:01 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Dealing with liberals? Remember: when you wrestle with a pig, you both get dirty and he loves it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq
woman n 1: an adult female person (as opposed to a man); "the woman kept house while the man hunted" [syn: adult female] [ant: man] 2: women as a class; "it's an insult to American womanhood"; "woman is the glory of creation" [syn: womanhood] 3: a human female who does housework; "the char will clean the carpet" [syn: charwoman, char, cleaning woman, cleaning lady] 4: a female person who plays a significant role (wife or mistress or girlfriend) in the life of a particular man; "he was faithful to his woman" [ant: man]

Source: WordNet ® 2.0, © 2003 Princeton University Source: Easton's 1897 Bible Dictionary Source: On-line Medical Dictionary, © 1997-98 Academic Medical Publishing & CancerWE

16 posted on 06/12/2005 6:45:56 AM PDT by johnny7 ('Mama T' has seen her husbands 'dishonorable discharge'... close up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen

The thought of Hitlary in the White House as POTUS literally makes me ill. I don't know if the U.S. could survive another round with the Clinton's, and their body count.


17 posted on 06/12/2005 6:46:13 AM PDT by Engine82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nj26
"We'll be hearing a lot more about that. I still remember how the MSM portrayed her as a "victim" because Rick Lazio pointed near her face during their debate in 2000. Any male candidate is going to be chastised for calling her to task."

Hillary thrives on public perception that she is a victim. Don't forget that the first chapter of Joyce Milton's "The First Partner: Hillary Rodham Clinton," is entitled "The First Victim."

18 posted on 06/12/2005 6:48:19 AM PDT by sageb1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
"McCain and Frist believe they are credible presidential candidates, and they may well be. Speaking their names in the same breath with Hillary Rodham Clinton would bestow upon her the very same level of credibility. So why not?

"Because she's a woman. And because she's a Clinton."

She is neither.

19 posted on 06/12/2005 6:52:15 AM PDT by cloud8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

"For the first time in national polling, a slim majority of registered voters tells Gallup that they would be "very" or "somewhat" likely to vote for Clinton in the 2008 presidential contest.
Someone tell me this is a lie!!!"

Okay... It's a lie. When you see the words "national poll" and "washington post" in the same sentence, you can take what they say with a grain of salt. Remember what the polls did for the 2004 election? It's pure propaganda.

propaganda: "The systematic propagation of a doctrine or cause or of information reflecting the views and interests of those advocating such a doctrine or cause." (answers.com)


20 posted on 06/12/2005 6:52:46 AM PDT by LibSnubber (liberal democrats are domestic terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson