This is a huge lie to conceal the real statistics. Some women have many abortions, the vast majority have none.
Some women use abortion as their primary means of birth control.
What this 'debate' comes down to is the reality of the alive, gestating unborn ... are they humans at an early age and thus abortion purposely kills an innocent human, or are they mere tissue masses 'with potential to become human beings'? THAT is the heinous dichotomy of abortion on demand ... science says the gestating life is a human being at an early age in a lifetime already begun at conception. Secular humanism says it doesn't matter if the one giving life support wants to terminate the relationship, thus empowering women in this secular/god-slapping way. When science provides a dependable artificial womb for transferring these young humans for continued life support, what do we suppose the argument will transmogrify into to continue the slaughtering empowerment?