[muawiyah]

The group pushing for a new temple may have the wrong site in mind. We have it on only the slimmest authority that Herod got it right when he substantially increased Temple Mount.

I've always thought that as corrupt and evil as the guy was he must certainly have kept the best part for his own real estate interests and stuck the temple (and it's contributors) with a secondary site.

When the Romans burned and tore down the entirity of Jerusalem we lost a lot of records that could have told us precisely where the Temple should go.

So, other than the New Sanhedran folks probably being heretics, what else did you wish to know.

Today when you visit Temple Mount and go in the mosque there's an stone there that was supposed to have been under the original altar. It has what seems to be a horses' hoof print in it ~ which is a piece of identity reflected in the Moslem tradition that Mohammad mounted up to Heaven at that point on his horse. I've always wondered if there's any sort of Biblical information that describes that stone as well as the hoofprint. Just haven't found it, but until the stone can be explained, I'm going to be very open to the arguments of those who claim "this ain't it".

[TASMANIANRED]

Excavations alongside the wailing wall underneath the temple mount have exposed the 2000 year old walls of the temple.

Mohamed never visited Jerusalem. He dreamed of it once.

Moslem's have a long history of desecrating religious sites of other faiths by claiming them as their own.

The Church of San Sofia in Istanbul is a Catholic church converted to a mosque.

Temple Mount is covered by a Mosque to deny the most holy site in all of Israel to the Jews.