1 posted on
06/10/2005 5:48:36 PM PDT by
MRMEAN
To: MRMEAN
This case was all about affirming Wickard vs. Fillmore (the wrongful interpretation of the Commerce Clause that forms the heart of the legal foundation behind the New Deal and modern liberal America,) and not about drug abuse or Marijuana.
2 posted on
06/10/2005 5:55:00 PM PDT by
sourcery
("Compelling State Interest" is the refuge of judicial activist traitors against the Constitution)
To: MRMEAN
Cannabis is the specific for migraine headaches, even darkroom migraines, and the nausea that accompanies them.
3 posted on
06/10/2005 5:59:54 PM PDT by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
To: MRMEAN
Liberalism to cancer patients: Drop dead
For some reason that is really funny. Not that having cancer is funny or that dropping dead is particularly amusing either. Its just so stupid.
To: MRMEAN
10 posted on
06/10/2005 6:24:57 PM PDT by
TBP
To: MRMEAN
Scalia's take on this truly surprises me.
I thought he was a constitutionalist.
11 posted on
06/10/2005 6:25:55 PM PDT by
evad
(No action to secure borders, No action on judges... NO MONEY!)
To: MRMEAN
A completely misleading headline.
What the Supreme Court actually said is, "It's not our call. It's Congress'."
15 posted on
06/10/2005 6:40:29 PM PDT by
JCEccles
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson