Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

One Reporter's Opinion – Never Legalize Pot!
Newmax ^ | Friday, June 10, 2005 | Gearge Putnam

Posted on 06/10/2005 2:32:31 PM PDT by Nachum

It is this reporter's opinion that each generation in turn takes a new look at the marijuana question. Now it's this generation's turn. In a 6-to-3 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that federal anti-marijuana statutes overrule the laws in ten states that allow the use of marijuana plants to ease pain or nausea.

Fifty years ago, as a much younger television reporter, I did a series of interviews with Dr. Hardin B. Jones, Professor of Medical Physics and Physiology at the University of California Berkeley. Dr. Jones, in his thorough study, raised disturbing questions about marijuana's effects on the vital systems of the body, on the brain and mind, on immunity and resistance, and on sex reproduction.

Dr. Jones addressed such problems of society as the hazards to non-smokers, crime, the law, and the effect of widespread smoking among the military – including atomic weapons personnel. And he didn't stop there. The good doctor included telling comments from interviews conducted with scores of marijuana users and ex-users.

I concluded, after this exhaustive study, that the very idea of legalizing marijuana is to follow a senseless, immoral, perilous path – a slippery slope, that the use of marijuana is dangerous on many fronts, that it impairs memory, alters time perception, reduces coordination, damages the immune system, is psychologically habit-forming and creates a wide range of effects on moods and behavior.

Dr. Jones offered an open letter to parents. Following are the main points discussed in his letter:

Marijuana is not a benign drug. Use of this drug impairs learning and judgment and may lead to the development of mental health problems.

Smoking marijuana can injure or destroy lung tissue.

Teens who are high on marijuana are less able to make safe, smart decisions about sex, including knowing when to say "no."

Marijuana can impair perception and reaction time, putting young drivers and others in danger.

Marijuana use may trigger panic attacks, paranoia, and even psychoses.

Marijuana can impair concentration and the ability to retain information during a teen's peak learning years.

Recent research indicates a correlation between frequent marijuana use and aggressive or violent behavior.

Dr. Jones concludes: MARIJUANA IS ADDICTIVE, and says that more teens are in treatment with a primary diagnosis of marijuana dependence than for all other illicit drugs combined.

Personally, I recall one visitation to a rehabilitation center where we interviewed recovering heroin addicts. We had to interview 25 hard-core drug users before we found a single one who had not started with marijuana!

As for those who say they must rely on marijuana to treat their pain, Dr. Jones cited a Washington University School of Medicine study on the subject: the experiment on twenty young men who were experienced marijuana smokers. Before and after they smoked reefers, electric impulses of different strengths were applied to their fingers and pain thresholds recorded. It was a method that earlier had verified the pain-killing effects of morphine, aspirin and codeine. MARIJUANA NOT ONLY FAILED TO LESSEN PAIN, IT ACTUALLY INCREASED IT! That finding casts doubt on the usefulness of marijuana as an analgesic.

The same facts and conclusions are repeated generation after generation with the same conclusion: DON'T EVER LEGALIZE POT!


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: cheetosruledude; doobiesruleman; drugskill; ganjalovers; gatewaydrug; legalize; never; nokingbutjesus; one; pot; potheads; reefermadness; reporter; sopinion; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 361-378 next last
Comment #161 Removed by Moderator

To: antony

Hey, how do you differentiate between "socialism" and the "post offices and post roads" clause in the Constitution?


162 posted on 06/11/2005 1:32:28 PM PDT by muawiyah (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Bentham is one with rare insight. Spencer is another. Green is the godfather of the theory of the State.


163 posted on 06/11/2005 1:32:46 PM PDT by RightWhale (I know nothing, and less every day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
You do not own yourself.

You need go no further, that statement speaks volumes!
If I do not own myself, I am property. Who owns me? The federal government? The state goverment? You?
The self ownership argument stands.
...
164 posted on 06/11/2005 1:33:20 PM PDT by mugs99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: mugs99

Who owns the patent on your DNA?


165 posted on 06/11/2005 1:34:32 PM PDT by muawiyah (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: mugs99
If I do not own myself, I am property.

We ought to distinguish between possession and property. Property is something acknowledged by the State. There is a Title or Deed. Something can be possessed without being property. Treating a person as property is slavery, whether the State, or the whipboss, or yourself do it. Slavery is illegal, in this country, to a degree.

166 posted on 06/11/2005 1:38:18 PM PDT by RightWhale (I know nothing, and less every day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Once we get past that then maybe you can differentiate between socialism and community

I wasn't part of that debate, but the answer is simple common knowledge.
Government can't repudiate brass, gold or silver. Government can repudiate paper by simply printing more. Paper is an I.O.U., not money.
Brass, gold and silver have intrinsic value...Real money.
...
167 posted on 06/11/2005 1:43:09 PM PDT by mugs99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

Comment #168 Removed by Moderator

To: mugs99
It's not a matter of "owning", it's a matter of the ability to act in a manner that you believe is in your self interest.

On a sliding scale of government limits (intrusions) over the choices you are allowed to exercise, on one end you will find anarchy & on the other totalitarianism. Pure socialism (communism) argues in favor of totalitarianism for the "common good". Democratic socialism argues in favor of mob rule, where the majority have the power to use force over individuals, again for the "common good".

Pure anarchy could also be called the law of the jungle, where the strongest (or wiliest) of any particular encounter is the one in power of the interaction. The stronger would have a great deal of personal freedom, while the weaker would have less or none.

Our government was set up as a constitutional republic, where great limits were supposed to have been placed to reign in the collective will for the "common good". Men were expected to work towards the common good, because it was the right thing to do, not because the government had the power to coerce citizens to do so.

We've wandered into democratic socialism, but it didn't happen instantly, so most of the nation's citizens do not recognize it for what it is.
169 posted on 06/11/2005 1:44:28 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: mugs99
Brass, gold and silver have intrinsic value

Industrial or military use? In that case, so does iron or Portland cement.

170 posted on 06/11/2005 1:47:19 PM PDT by RightWhale (I know nothing, and less every day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
There was another freeper named muggsy awhile back and NY muggs

I guess it is more popular than I realized. I don't know why anyone else chose the name but mine is the nickname my little bratty sister gave me because she couldn't say my real name. There was a monkey on TV, when we were little girls, named J Fred Muggs and that's were she got the name.

171 posted on 06/11/2005 1:49:35 PM PDT by muggs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: mugs99
How about those "impressions" of the brass bulls in the mud?

Those ultimately became much more important than the brass or the bulls. Gold and silver didn't become money until AFTER that time, although both were in use in ancient Sumer.

172 posted on 06/11/2005 1:53:10 PM PDT by muawiyah (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: antony
"reasonable" means a lot of things to a lot of people. Personally, after nearly 4 decades working with the critter I think the post office clause should be rescinded and the whole business privatized.

With GPS equipment, we will shortly be able to eliminate PUBLIC HIGHWAYS and ROADS. UK is working on charging folks by the mile, and once that's in place there are an infinitude of business opportunities.

Let's say I think I can take care of 10 miles of Arlington Boulevard better than Virginia. So, I buy the highway~! Then I take care of it, and let the GPS system figure out who owes what and remits that to me out of the direct payments made by drivers.

Someone else buys another highway. And so forth. We begin competing ~ my 10 miles against your alternate route.

We could get rid of the "post roads" part in the Constitution as well.

Eliminate the "gold and silver as lawful money" clause, thereby allowing anybody to do anything, and I just bet we could initiate the extirpation of every last vestige of socialism from our society.

So what's this "reasonable" stuff again? Sounds positively Luddite!

173 posted on 06/11/2005 1:57:48 PM PDT by muawiyah (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

The post used to be operated by the University as an adjunct to the Church. Let the guys on bicycles do it, they visit everybody anyway.


174 posted on 06/11/2005 1:59:59 PM PDT by RightWhale (I know nothing, and less every day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
We ought to distinguish between possession and property

No, we ought not. That is a paternalistic argument used to confuse a child. Do you believe yourself to be my parent? Possession is holding property. Without property, there is nothing to posess.

Property is something acknowledged by the State

Yes, I have a serial number and so do you.

Treating a person as property is slavery....Slavery is illegal, in this country, to a degree.

ROFL!
"To a degree"?
Use of property is subject to the interest of the owner.
If the state owns me, any freedom I have is a privilege granted to me by my state master. At any time my owner feels a compelling interest to take my privilege he may do so.

The self ownership argument stands.
175 posted on 06/11/2005 2:07:33 PM PDT by mugs99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

Comment #176 Removed by Moderator

To: GoLightly
We've wandered into democratic socialism, but it didn't happen instantly, so most of the nation's citizens do not recognize it for what it is.

Very true. The question is...How do we do we get back on track?
...
177 posted on 06/11/2005 2:14:34 PM PDT by mugs99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Industrial or military use? In that case, so does iron or Portland cement

Use doesn't matter, value does. Iron and cement can, and have been, used as money.
...
178 posted on 06/11/2005 2:20:25 PM PDT by mugs99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
How about those "impressions" of the brass bulls in the mud?

They went beyond money. Religious icons are not used in common trade. I've lived in places where a Hershey bar had more monetary value than government paper or coin.
...
179 posted on 06/11/2005 2:27:49 PM PDT by mugs99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: mugs99
The TS case proves the second part of your argument.

Self-ownership is impossible, however self-government is the situation.

If we persist in using technical terms on the street level, nothing but prima facie thought is demonstrated, and FR ought to do better than that or fold its tent.

180 posted on 06/11/2005 2:49:28 PM PDT by RightWhale (I know nothing, and less every day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 361-378 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson