Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boeing 777-200LR Worldliner Arrives at Paris Air Show
Boeing ^ | June 10, 2005

Posted on 06/10/2005 1:07:46 PM PDT by Righty_McRight

-- 20-city ‘Going the Distance' world tour kicked off -- World record flight scheduled for later this year

PARIS, June 10, 2005 -- The Boeing [NYSE:BA] 777-200LR Worldliner -- the world's longest-range commercial airplane -- completed its first intercontinental flight today, arriving at the Le Bourget, France, airport for the 46 th Paris Air Show.

This week in Montreal , the 777-200LR kicked off its "Going the Distance" tour, and will visit more than 20 cities in the Middle East, Asia, Europe, Australia, and North America through August.

"Recent sales successes demonstrate that demand for the 777-200LR is climbing," said Boeing Commercial Airplanes Vice President and Program Manager, 777 Program, Lars Andersen. "During our tour, airlines around the world will have the opportunity to experience the comfort, capability, and efficiency of this tremendous airplane."

Later this year, the Worldliner will attempt to set a new world record for distance traveled nonstop by a commercial airplane. The current record -- 10,823 nautical miles (20,044 kilometers) -- was set in 1997 by the 777-200ER ( Extended Range ). Details for the record flight -- during which the airplane is to fly for approximately 24 hours -- will be released in weeks ahead.

The 777-200LR, capable of connecting almost any two cities in the world nonstop, is the fifth 777 model. In service it can carry 301 passengers and baggage up to 9,420 nautical miles (17,445 kilometers).

Each section of the 777-200LR Worldliner tour airplane's cabin demonstrates new and innovative features that enhance the 777's reputation as the most comfortable and passenger-preferred airplane. The airplane showcases the latest 777 interior offerings and cabin layouts that allow airlines to differentiate their product offering to passengers.

Boeing has entered into marketing partnerships with several companies for the tour, including General Electric Aircraft Engines, Bose, Thales, AeroMobile, Motorola and Teague.

Launch customer Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) is to receive the first 777-200LR Worldliner in January. To date, four airlines have ordered or announced commitments for the 777-200LR -- PIA, EVA Airways, Air Canada and Air India. Orders and commitments for the 777-200LR have more than tripled since the airplane was unveiled in February.

###

Contact: Marc Birtel, 777 Communications, 206-390-4115 (mobile)


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: 777; boeing; parisairshow; worldliner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: OneWorldTory

Crazy flying bottlenosed dolphin...


21 posted on 06/10/2005 1:25:22 PM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

What a beauty!


22 posted on 06/10/2005 1:25:51 PM PDT by stylecouncilor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneWorldTory

I've said it before, that A380 is an ugly looking monster. It has none of the grace of the 747, or any other aircradt for that matter.


23 posted on 06/10/2005 1:25:54 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: OneWorldTory; Admin Moderator

Since you're fairly new, you probably don't know this but. we're not allowed to post Getty images because of Getty's obsession with protecting their copyrights.


25 posted on 06/10/2005 1:26:25 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Just Blame President Bush For Everything, It Is Easier Than Using Your Brain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: andyk

I love it.


26 posted on 06/10/2005 1:27:17 PM PDT by RobbyS (chirho)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
Actually that would be the 767 followed soon after by the 757, A300 and A310. However, their ETOPS was only for 120 at the time. The 777 was the first to receive 180-minute ETOPS from its first day of operation.

Can you explain what you mean by the 120 and 180 minute ETOPS? I know ETOPS qualifies each of these planes to fly across the ocean, but the other two items are a mystery.
27 posted on 06/10/2005 1:31:59 PM PDT by GarySpFc (Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: OneWorldTory

It's all about the motion of the ocean.


28 posted on 06/10/2005 1:34:53 PM PDT by Righty_McRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
ETOPS, as others have said, stands for Extended Twin-Engine Operations. Basically the ETOPS rules govern how far a twin engine aircraft is allowed to fly from the nearest adequate airport. 120 minutes means they must always be within 2 hours of the nearest adequate airport, 180 of course is three hours and now they're looking at 207 or 240 minute ETOPS for aircraft like the 777-200LR.

The rules first came about when aircraft engines were not nearly as reliable as they are now. The chances of losing both engines due to mechanical failure is so remote that it is safe to fly the twin engine aircraft extremely long distance.

29 posted on 06/10/2005 1:37:35 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Just Blame President Bush For Everything, It Is Easier Than Using Your Brain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

I love the 747. It has to be my all time favorite beautiful passenger plane, although the DC-3 was beautiful, as was the Constellation. I also think, for classic design the 727 was nice. The Concord goes without saying.


30 posted on 06/10/2005 1:37:52 PM PDT by rlmorel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

It's amazing how many 727s are still in use. That fact alone indicates that the design was a good one.


31 posted on 06/10/2005 1:45:49 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Don't Tread on Me; Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight
The range of this airplane is insane. Absolutely insane. If you check out the technical specs on Boeing's website (click range, a city, and then 777-200LR) you will be amazed. It can connect from Los Angeles to Perth, Australia or London to Sydney with ease. Some very long flights.
32 posted on 06/10/2005 1:46:00 PM PDT by burzum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight

Airbus has had to delay delivering on the orders they already have by 6 months:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1414781/posts


33 posted on 06/10/2005 1:49:31 PM PDT by LibFreeOrDie (L'chaim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
I love it.

The 777, or the A380? I don't really know much about either plane (aside from who the manufacturers are). I do know that the A380 is a really strange and awkward-looking plane, IMHO.
34 posted on 06/10/2005 1:50:59 PM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
As others have discussed ETOPS limits the places a plane can fly. In some cases, this makes a less efficient route. For example, it may be faster to fly from New York to Tokyo by flying over the artic ice cap, but the airplane would be further from an airport than it is rated.
35 posted on 06/10/2005 1:51:58 PM PDT by burzum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
Seems like most in the industry are expecting Airbus to eat Boeing alive when it comes to orders at the Paris Air Show.

About the only reason Airbus takes any orders is that they offer terms that struggling carriers can't refuse. If Boeing was subsidized by taxpayers the way Airbus is it would outsell Airbus 10-1.

My son is a pilot with a major US carrier. He was switched from 727s to Airbus recently as his company phases out the Boeings. He likes the fly by wire and state of the art avionics, but other than that I think he would rather be back in the old 727 workhorses.

His company bought the Airbus planes because it was offered a very enticing zero interest, long term payment deal that Boeing couldn't match. I suppose European taxpayers are picking up the tab for whatever amount Airbus will lose on the deal.

36 posted on 06/10/2005 1:54:20 PM PDT by epow ("Nothing doth more hurt in a state than that cunning men pass for wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight

My favorite plane!! Next in line is the top deck on a 747 but the 777 is awesome! Even in coach it's comfortable.


37 posted on 06/10/2005 1:55:58 PM PDT by Lx (Do you like it, do you like it Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andyk
Does that mean there's no airman looking through a window in the tail?

My son is a "boomer" on a KC-10.
He gets some great pictures from that window.

38 posted on 06/10/2005 1:58:37 PM PDT by RightWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: epow
I suppose European taxpayers are picking up the tab for whatever amount Airbus will lose on the deal.

That is exactly how it is.

39 posted on 06/10/2005 1:59:17 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Just Blame President Bush For Everything, It Is Easier Than Using Your Brain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
Yes... I am a big fan of the 747 and I hope Boeing will launch the 747 Advanced soon.
Have you seen the conceptual artist pictures of the 747 Advanced in Boeing's colors ? what a beauty.
But, just as impressive is the 777 ( actually ? only slightly smaller that the 747 without the Iconic 747 Hump )...
The Lockheed Constellation is a legend in it's beauty.. I don't need to say anymore on that... it holds it's own against other plane designs.
Another beauty is the DC-9 .....
But, the 747 is in a class all by it's self.
40 posted on 06/10/2005 2:00:18 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The ( FOOL ) hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson