Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Volcker: U.S. Economic Crisis Imminent
NewsMax.com ^ | june 10, 2005

Posted on 06/10/2005 4:32:57 AM PDT by paudio

Former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker said he doesn't see how the U.S. can keep borrowing and consuming while letting foreign countries do all the producing. It's a recipe for American economic disaster.

On Thursday the Wall Street Journal reported bluntly that "Mr. Volcker thinks a crisis is likely."

Volcker believes that investor confidence could fade "at some point," he said, with "damaging volatility in both exchange markets and interest rates."

He believes a serious economic crisis is likely unavoidable as the U.S. economy is struggling with what Volcker sees as a hopelessly unsustainable relationship with the rest of the world.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: economy; kofiscabinboy; volcker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: paudio

Volcker has as much crediblity as one will give him. Being old enough to remember when he was chairman, I now find it hard to consider him particularly insightful (at the time, he did make perform as a functional place-holder in the best country-club RINO sort of way). Considering his performance in OFF, I now view him far less sanguinely, and tend to think that steampower's assessment may be correct.


21 posted on 06/10/2005 5:01:17 AM PDT by niteowl77 (I see seven senators badly in need of emergency RINOplasty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio

LOL...and we are supposed to believe this guy, who didn't see anything wrong with Annan's role in the Oil for Food scandal? Go home, Volcker. You are just another old sell-out, who still wants MSM interviews.


22 posted on 06/10/2005 5:01:58 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
Is that what happened in '29?

Without a doubt. Also in 1999, and the current bubbles in the real estate market. The inflation in the 1970's would also be a very good example.

23 posted on 06/10/2005 5:02:21 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Volcker is is absolutely correct. All one has to do is read up on the articles over at financialsense.com and prudentbearfund.com and you will see the gathering economic storm clouds quite clearly.


24 posted on 06/10/2005 5:02:41 AM PDT by BringBackMyHUAC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio

I think Volcker is talking as much about consumer debt as government debt. It is a concern. We put more money in the economy by borrowing and then send it overseas to buy foreign products.

Think about this situation in the exreme. Imagine an economy which consists entirely of money which is created by deficit spending. All of that money is then converted into foreign currency and used to purchase foreign goods. That money wouldn't be worth very much in exchange, would it? The only thing keeping us out of trouble is that our economy is growing fast enough to keep us out of trouble - for now.


25 posted on 06/10/2005 5:02:46 AM PDT by Toskrin (Socialism is communism a little bit at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

It was necessarily strong medicine.

Paul Adolph Volcker (born September 5, 1927), economist, is best-known as the Chairman of the Federal Reserve under United States Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan (from August 1979 to August 1987). Educated at Princeton, Harvard and the London School of Economics, from 1969 to 1974 Mr. Volcker served as under-secretary of the Treasury for international monetary affairs. He played an important role in the decisions surrounding the US decision to suspend gold convertibility in 1971, which resulted in the collapse of the Bretton Woods system. In general he acted as a moderating influence on policy, advocating the pursuit of an international solution to monetary problems. After leaving the US Treasury, he became president of the New York Federal Reserve Bank from 1975 to 1979.

Volcker's Fed is credited with ending the United States' inflation crisis of the early 1980s. They achieved this by constricting the money supply through a sharp increase in interest rates. By 1985, inflation was considerably lowered from 9 percent in 1980 to 3.2 percent in 1983. This disinflation was predictably accompanied by a decrease in GDP growth (i.e. a recession), and by an increase in unemployment, which rose to the highest levels since World War II. Both GDP and unemployment returned to normal levels when the inflation problem had been solved and interest rates were lowered, however.


26 posted on 06/10/2005 5:03:42 AM PDT by Arkie2 (No, I never voted for Bill Clinton. I don't plan on voting Republican again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2
It was necessarily strong medicine.

That is debatable. Raising rates was necessary, but he went too high and far too long.

27 posted on 06/10/2005 5:06:52 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: glm
Reagan's high deficits eventually resulted in the cold war ending and inflation and interest rates declining to acceptable levels.

What does Bush expect from jacking up the debt so high? It's just maintaining current interest rates, not lowering them and there is no Cold War. (WOT isn't even close)
28 posted on 06/10/2005 5:08:59 AM PDT by Rebelbase (Mexico, the 51st state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

"The standard of living of the average American has to decline.... I don't think you can escape that." - Paul Volcker, 1979


29 posted on 06/10/2005 5:09:15 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

>>Can't say I disagree.

I agree with that.


30 posted on 06/10/2005 5:09:35 AM PDT by Glenn (pardon the e.e.cummings look. a busted arm makes typing seem like work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jer33 3
Was it Paul Volcker who wrote a book WITH George $$oro$? Or maybe he wrote the foreword.

He sure did. The Alchemy of Finance

31 posted on 06/10/2005 5:13:16 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: paudio
Former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker said he doesn't see how the U.S. can keep borrowing and consuming while letting foreign countries do all the producing. It's a recipe for American economic disaster.

Current Chairman Alan Greenspan disagrees.

32 posted on 06/10/2005 5:14:15 AM PDT by infocats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2

Agreed. The Fed has little or no control over long term interest rates. Long term rates are governed by inflation, which in turn is heavily influenced by growth in money supply. Now money supply can be reduced to some degree by increasing short term interest rates. But short term rates have to really go up to lower money supply, which then can lower inflation, which then can lower long term interst rates.

Reagan's deficit spending was a great boost to economic growth, but it did nothing to lower rates and curb inflation.


33 posted on 06/10/2005 5:17:25 AM PDT by Toskrin (Socialism is communism a little bit at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Well, I think that Americans can keep borrowing as long as interest rates remain low. When they go up, the borrowing will cease. Also, money will begin to move from the stock market to the bond market. As capital becomes more difficult to borrow, one can imagine that the job market would be hurt.

Meanwhile, as the state takes increased responsibility for all aspects of our lives, while also fighting a war on terror, spending is at an all time high. To acquire the funds, the fed taxes us at near an all time high on the one hand, on the other, it borrows the shortfall, also from us.

The whole situation does seem kind of negative. I could wish for the state to play a much smaller part of life.


34 posted on 06/10/2005 5:19:16 AM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

"he doesn't see how the U.S. can keep borrowing and consuming while letting foreign countries do all the producing. It's a recipe for American economic disaster."

Tonight will be dark out with the chance of the sun coming up tomorrow.

duh.


35 posted on 06/10/2005 5:48:14 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: infocats
Current Chairman Alan Greenspan disagrees.

Well, as the architect of the stock and real estate bubbles, he would, wouldn't he? ;)

36 posted on 06/10/2005 5:52:09 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Violence never settles anything." Genghis Khan, 1162-1227)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
duh.

I would say "duh" too if everyone from Ben Bernanke to Larry Kudlow weren't loudly insisting that the sun will keep shining no matter how late it gets. ;)

37 posted on 06/10/2005 5:53:44 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Violence never settles anything." Genghis Khan, 1162-1227)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2
He did his job thirty or so years ago to bring Carter's inflation under control, but I would wager even then that he was doing the bidding of others on that errand.
38 posted on 06/10/2005 6:00:28 AM PDT by Thebaddog (Dawgs off the coffee table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
That is debatable. Raising rates was necessary, but he went too high and far too long.

Volcker raised rates because Reagan wanted to strengthen the dollar. The devaluation of the dollar in the early 1970's was the real catalyst behind all the inflation we had (see the Bretton Woods accord). Other factors were panic by politicians which led to price controls and over regulation of the oil market.

The real long term cure for inflation was the economic growth that resulted from Reagan's policies. That's right, economic growth is deflationary, contrary to what the central bank and politicians would have you believe. Your belief is necessary for you to allow them to micromanage the economy.

39 posted on 06/10/2005 6:05:35 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I to agree this is a train wreck waiting to happen.


40 posted on 06/10/2005 6:08:14 AM PDT by TXBSAFH (One man's Linux is another man's OS/2.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson