Skip to comments.
Clear Rules Needed To Govern Deep Sea Bioprospecting: UNU
SpaceDaily.com ^
| 6/10/05
Posted on 06/10/2005 4:04:53 AM PDT by nuke rocketeer
Japan (SPX) Jun 10, 2005 Vast genetic resources "blue gold" on the international deep sea floor need protection from unfettered commercial exploitation, warns a new report from the Japan-based United Nations University Institute for Advanced Studies (UNU-IAS). Increasingly recognized as important to humankind for their potential medical and other uses, deep sea resources are now more accessible and vulnerable than ever because of rapid advances in exploration technology, the report says.
Known as "extremophiles," the genetic make-up of organisms of the deep that live in extreme conditions of pressure, temperature and toxicity is drawing enormous interest from scientists and companies bioprospecting for possible pharmaceutical or industrial applications.
Already several valuable products have been created and there is growing recognition of the potential of deep sea genes to advance human welfare.
(Excerpt) Read more at spacedaily.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: deepsea; lost; regulation; socialistidiocy; taxation; un; unitednations
Looks like another back door attempt by the UN to get more power and taxation authority.
To: nuke rocketeer
You can bet that if the environmentalists and the UN are against it, it is good for business and the US.
2
posted on
06/10/2005 4:16:11 AM PDT
by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
To: nuke rocketeer
I do NOT understand why Bush favors the LOST treaty..
3
posted on
06/10/2005 4:49:10 AM PDT
by
ken5050
To: nuke rocketeer
This is what the LOST treaty is about. Personally, I think it should stay lost. Problem is, the globalists (which unfortunately includes Bush) want it really bad. They'll keep pushing it until it goes through. I think we ought to put a time limit on treaties where if they aren't ratified by 5 years after they've been signed, they expire. They started doing this on constitutional amendment proposals, and I think it would be a good thing for treaties too.
4
posted on
06/10/2005 8:08:22 AM PDT
by
zeugma
(Democrats are Varelse...)
To: farmfriend
5
posted on
06/10/2005 8:16:33 AM PDT
by
uglybiker
(A woman's most powerful weapon is a guy's imagination.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson