Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GM to lay off 25,000, Close Plants
Green Car Congress | 6/7/05

Posted on 06/09/2005 7:27:12 PM PDT by inchworm

June 07, 2005 GM to Layoff 25,000, Close Plants In his address to GM’s annual meeting of stockholders today, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Rick Wagoner outlined in broad strokes his plan for turning around GM North America, which lost $1.3 billion in the first quarter of this year.

The basics of the downturn are pretty clear: GM’s costs are too high, sales are dropping, and the sales mix is skewing away from the high-profit SUVs to the lower-profit cars.

The highest profile action was his announcement of the closing of additional assembly and component plants over the next few years, and the layoff in the US of 25,000 or more workers in the 2005 to 2008 period to generate estimated annual savings of some $2.5 billion.

He also indicated that GM and the UAW are “in discussion” as to how to resolve the issue of the cost of health care. With plant closings and job losses as a potential threat, the union may be more inclined to negotiate some sort of concession on health care. Or maybe not.

On the product side, GM is advancing the timing of several high-volume, high-profit programs (refreshes and new designs) in the area of large pick-ups and mid- and large-utilities.

Looking out a little farther, we’re prioritizing our product development resources in the areas where we see the greatest volume, growth, and profit opportunities—crossovers of all kinds; entry luxury and premium models; hybrids and other technologies to improve fuel efficiency.

At least hybrids and fuel efficiency made it onto the future shortlist.

Separately, GM and DaimlerChrysler indicated that they each will invest up to US$500 million in a joint venture to develop the two-mode hybrid powertrain (earlier post). The two companies intend to make the first cars using the hybrid system by early 2008. (AFX)

It seems that GM, even in its turnaround plan, is still dependent on the large trucks and SUVs to pull it out of its decline. The riskiness of that approach is reflected in the recently revised credit ratings that brought GM paper to junk-bond status.

That’s not to say that GM hasn’t had its success with recent launches. The new Chevy Cobalt, for example, was the sixth best-selling car in the US in May (behind Toyota, Honda and Nissan models). (Car Buyer’s Notebook)

But that’s not going to close the financial gap created by the over reliance on larger-format vehicles that suddenly are not selling.

Short-term Technology Associations Automaker Technology GM – Ford Hybrids, H2ICE DaimlerChrysler Clean Diesel Toyota Hybrids Honda Hybrids, CNG And in the area of strategically associating itself with a short-term technology solution for fuel efficiency and sustainable mobility—which will become increasingly important as oil prices remain upwardly volatile and climate change issues come more to the fore—GM has no short-term position or traction.

That’s not to say that they don’t have technology development underway, but that there is no popular association of such a technology with a GM product that someone can walk into a showroom and buy now. Fuel cell development doesn’t count—that’s too far down the road (so to speak).

The GM North America situation is a very tough problem, and one that will have nasty ripple effects throughout the supply chain. I think that the company will have to get more aggressive on the product side than currently suggested (to wait until 2008 to manufacture hybrids is not a good idea)—and that it will have to cut more than currently announced.

June 07, 2005 in


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: automakers; generalmotors; layoffs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
I'm suprised nobody has posted this announcement yet. This is sad for GM since last week there was news touting that GM and Toyota have the highest reliability ratings. Despite this, Americans are buying a higher % of imports even though the imports even cost more too. I know there are a lot of conservatives who buy foreign cars because they are non-union made, but overall I think that the domestic automobile manufacturers (GM, FORD)have a higher market share in red states and particularly in Red counties. I'd love to see a map comparison of the Red/blue states from the 2004 presidential election to states or counties with the highest auto import market share. In observation it seems that when I drive to democratic counties I see a higher percentage of Honda's and Toyota's. This is ironic to me since the union workers from GM and Ford tend to vote for the Dem/Lib ticket. Don't they know that their anti-American Dem/Lib peers don't seem to be buying their cars? Is anyone capable of doing this comparative research? I think it could be an intersting topic and tool.
1 posted on 06/09/2005 7:27:12 PM PDT by inchworm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: inchworm

Well, if we had the Fair Tax maybe GM could compete.

My 2002 Honda has lousy seats, a reality that hit me even more when I had a GrandPrix Rental. After several calls to Honda No-Service Customer Service I wrote to the president of America Honda, Kyoshi Kondo. That was three weeks ago.....no reply yet. Guess if I'm buying a Honda again?
NO.


2 posted on 06/09/2005 7:30:38 PM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie (Everything I need to know about Islam I learned on 9-11!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inchworm

Have they looked into the possibility of closing GM plants outside of the U.S. instead, I am worried for my brother -in-law who works the line.


3 posted on 06/09/2005 7:30:38 PM PDT by brwnsuga (Proud, Black, Conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inchworm

There is nothing sad about this. The UAW union is fully responsible for destroying this company and they have reaped what they have sown.


4 posted on 06/09/2005 7:30:40 PM PDT by Wolfhound777 (It's not our job to forgive them. Only God can do that. Our job is to arrange the meeting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inchworm

And yet GM is opening plants in China.
We need to have a major discussion in a public forum about this.


5 posted on 06/09/2005 7:31:49 PM PDT by ProudVet77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inchworm

Greedy executives + greedy unions + dopey cars = Chapter 11


6 posted on 06/09/2005 7:34:13 PM PDT by DTogo (U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfhound777
There is nothing sad about this. The UAW union is fully responsible for destroying this company and they have reaped what they have sown.

On the contrary fellow Americans losing jobs is sad. The UAW didn't destroy the company - the company destroyed itself if it signed contracts that it shouldn't have. It takes two for a contract but you are blaming only one party.

7 posted on 06/09/2005 7:36:36 PM PDT by BipolarBob (Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I didn't see it in my rearview mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: inchworm

Build a better car = more sales. Simple as that. I stuck to my "buy American" auto as long as possible. But when it started costing me dollars due to a vastly inferior choice I had to buy a foreign car. Just build a competitive product please.


8 posted on 06/09/2005 7:37:51 PM PDT by SoCar (Refugee from NJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inchworm
Americans are buying a higher % of imports even though the imports even cost more

The chevy aveo is made in korea, the buick rendezvous is made in mexico, honda accord and civic are made in marysville ohio.

9 posted on 06/09/2005 7:38:46 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brwnsuga
Have they looked into the possibility of closing GM plants outside of the U.S. instead

No, the plants inside the US are older and need more upgrades than the newer ones overseas and the salaries and health care for US workers is more.

10 posted on 06/09/2005 7:40:38 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoCar

This is sad for GM since last week there was news touting that GM and Toyota have the highest reliability ratings

as stated above


11 posted on 06/09/2005 7:41:00 PM PDT by inchworm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie

Well, if we had the Fair Tax maybe GM could compete.
------
If GM had not made the disasterous decision to build a welfare state that is now costing them $1600 loss from the sale of EVERY vehicle, they would be in very good shape. Hopefully this country will wise up to union extortion and learn how to compete in the real world...and the part of the world that is kicking GM's butt, does not build these ex-employee welfare states. And they are winning.


12 posted on 06/09/2005 7:43:27 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: inchworm

The UAW is culpable for GM's decline. GM did themselves no favors by signing these ridiculous contracts. Did you see the article in the Wall Street Journal about the drunk UAW members on the assembly line? The UAW is like the greedy farmer who sheared his sheep so close that he clipped the skin and the ship got an infection and died.


13 posted on 06/09/2005 7:43:55 PM PDT by Serious Capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: ProudVet77
>> And yet GM is opening plants in China.

Every new plant (anywhere) is better than any old plant (anywhere).

It is all about competition, (management) complacency with market conditions, and the ability of the company to innovate and compete in order to survive. American management tends towards contented self satisfaction when market conditions warrant, and always get caught wanting for policy adjustment forecasting when market conditions change.

Capitalism dictates that there are are two types of competitors in any market; the quick and the dead.

Once again, as in the 70's, GM has to get quick, they are well aware of the option. The process is painful and the inefficient shall by capitalist dictate suffer. In the end what survives will be stronger, and quicker. Then complacency will again set in, and the cycle will renew.

GM could likely buy the competition, their task is to compete with them.
15 posted on 06/09/2005 7:47:07 PM PDT by mmercier (revolutions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dirtydanusa

I definately agree with that


16 posted on 06/09/2005 7:48:29 PM PDT by inchworm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dirtydanusa

Unions served a purpose a long time ago when they promised a fairs days work for a fair days wage. Their sole purpose now is suck the life blood out of corporations while returning less production and inferior products. As others have posted, GM management is the other half of the problem for making a deal with devil. I have no sympathy for either side.


17 posted on 06/09/2005 7:49:04 PM PDT by Wolfhound777 (It's not our job to forgive them. Only God can do that. Our job is to arrange the meeting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: inchworm

Right, some of us recognize outsourcing when we see it.


18 posted on 06/09/2005 7:49:06 PM PDT by Realism (Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfhound777

I thought about that when I heard they were discussing the new health care benefits. I hope managment is bluffing. I'm still not sure if unions are helpful or not. I wonder if the Chinese plant and the Mexican plant has a union?


19 posted on 06/09/2005 7:51:51 PM PDT by brwnsuga (Proud, Black, Conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: inchworm
It is so sad to see this happen, but they have been bringing it on themselves for 40 years. My Dad owned a gas station back when you didn't have to pump your own (that dates me, I guess). We could count on selling a quart of oil to every other Vega that pulled into the station. One guy had so many problems and got so little satisfaction he cut out lemons from some yellow contact paper and stuck them all over his car. I'll bet he never set foot in a GM dealership again. Today that same guy is retiring, and instead of a Caddie, he's looking at a Mercedes or Lexus. Olds is already history and Buick and Pontiac are next.
20 posted on 06/09/2005 7:52:07 PM PDT by beef (Who Killed Kennewick Man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson