Skip to comments.
Parents protest school fingerprint scans as 'Mark of the Beast' (Tangipahoa Parish, LA)
2theadvocate.com ^
| DEBRA LEMOINE
Posted on 06/09/2005 1:37:46 PM PDT by conserv13
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
1
posted on
06/09/2005 1:37:46 PM PDT
by
conserv13
To: conserv13
I'm confused - is this story about the prayer issue, or the fingerprinting issue?
To: conserv13
Whenever Christians act like nuts, the MSM is there to record every word. Whenever Christians act in a responsible, compassionate way, the MSM is nowhere to be found.
3
posted on
06/09/2005 1:39:43 PM PDT
by
My2Cents
To: My2Cents
Are you implying that not wanting the school to fingerprint your children is nuts?
4
posted on
06/09/2005 1:41:44 PM PDT
by
agitator
(...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
To: Steve_Seattle
It is about both - if you read the whole thing it is toward the bottom.
5
posted on
06/09/2005 1:42:59 PM PDT
by
conserv13
To: agitator
I agree that children should not be fingerprinted. But to say that the reason is some kind of 'end time' mark of the Beast thing is a bit nutty.
6
posted on
06/09/2005 1:44:14 PM PDT
by
conserv13
To: My2Cents
I have family in Tangipahoa Parish, so I know that there are many, many wonderful and decent people who live there. There are also a lot of nuts. This is the same parish with the ongoing devil worshipping/child sex abuse investigation.
7
posted on
06/09/2005 1:44:16 PM PDT
by
Melpomene
To: agitator
It's a biometric scanner, it doesn't "fingerprint" the kids. It converts a fingerprint into a code that can't be used to recreate the original fingerprint.
8
posted on
06/09/2005 1:44:59 PM PDT
by
durasell
(Friends are so alarming, My lover's never charming...)
To: Steve_Seattle
This is about so many things actually....
this concerns me:
"The Tangipahoa Parish School System is the first system in the state to test a biometric fingerprint system that scans children's index fingers to credit their lunch accounts as they move through the cafeteria line, school system spokeswoman Cindy Benitez said."
If my kids were in a private school I'd be a tad pissed about spending tuition on Biometric systems to charge me more money. That and the finger printing issues...
As for the mark of the beast you find one Wacko in the crowd who's worried about being marked with the sign of the beast, and Bam you've got yourself a Christian hating headline.
9
posted on
06/09/2005 1:45:51 PM PDT
by
tfecw
(Vote Democrat, It's easier than working)
To: Melpomene
Thanks for the local perspective. I think it goes without saying that 99% of those with concerns have legitimate concerns. The MSM focuses on the other 1%.
10
posted on
06/09/2005 1:46:22 PM PDT
by
My2Cents
To: conserv13
Actually, children should be fingerprinted by their parents. Always a good idea.
11
posted on
06/09/2005 1:46:58 PM PDT
by
durasell
(Friends are so alarming, My lover's never charming...)
To: agitator
Are you implying that not wanting the school to fingerprint your children is nuts?Though I don't like the school's fingerprinting children, I do think that the 1/2 hour of praying was as foolish as the Die-In's at the peace rallies in the last couple years. I'm not saying it's right, not saying it's wrong or unconstitutional; I'm just saying I think its foolish.
12
posted on
06/09/2005 1:47:10 PM PDT
by
BostonianRightist
(I don't trust a government I can't shoot back at.)
To: My2Cents
Whenever Christians act like nuts, the MSM is there to record every word. Whenever Christians act in a responsible, compassionate way, the MSM is nowhere to be found. Man, you've sure got that right! That is one of the MSM's tools. Character assassination through caricature.
13
posted on
06/09/2005 1:48:52 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
To: My2Cents
Before the meeting, McGovern and parent Janice Fairburn of Loranger acknowledged religious concerns about the scanners. The Book of Revelation talks of a "mark of the beast," which is a sign those people are damned. Some Christians believe that the fingerprint scanners are close to assigning their children a mark. Meaning, this reporter brought up the subjest and these two woman said something like "Yeah, kinda wierd, huh?" before the meeting even began.
14
posted on
06/09/2005 1:48:59 PM PDT
by
fml
To: conserv13
It's gathering information and it is one more step towards revelation where nobody will be able to buy or sell without the Beast's mark, number, or name in their hands or on their foreheads.
15
posted on
06/09/2005 1:49:40 PM PDT
by
Blogger
To: fml
Good catch. MSM stirring the pot, creating it's own news.
16
posted on
06/09/2005 1:50:21 PM PDT
by
My2Cents
To: BostonianRightist
Why? It is a peaceful thing. So what if they sue. We don't cow down to the ACLU and if they want to pray, let them.
17
posted on
06/09/2005 1:51:19 PM PDT
by
Blogger
To: conserv13
Isn't the mark of the beast supposed to be the same mark on everybody? Aren't all fingerprints different?
To: My2Cents
Whenever Christians act like nuts, the MSM is there to record every word. Whenever Christians act in a responsible, compassionate way, the MSM is nowhere to be found. People acting normal isn't news. You also don't often see news stories about Muslims who are just trying to live their lives in peace.
To: conserv13
I had dinner with "The Beast" last night and he said he doesn't car about fingerprints.
He does have a special place for Michael Jackson though...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson