Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pbrown
To me, it all comes down to Bolton.

Bolton isn't even part of the "deal", nor was the "nuclear option" going to apply to anyone besides judges.

1,004 posted on 06/09/2005 2:56:03 PM PDT by RobFromGa (Send Bolton to the UN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1001 | View Replies ]


To: RobFromGa
Bolton isn't even part of the "deal", nor was the "nuclear option" going to apply to anyone besides judges.

I didn't imply that it did.

I want Bolton to try and get his hands around the UN. That is the important vote to me. Maybe not to you, but to me it is.

I don't want the UN running rough shod over us, with Bolton there, they'll have a harder time trying.

1,014 posted on 06/09/2005 2:59:22 PM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1004 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa; pbrown

It doesn't matter whether or not Bolton is part of the 'deal'.

Filibustering an executive branch nominee, essentially a cabinet appointment, is even more ridiculous and untenable than filibustering a judicial nominee. They WILL not win on a nuke vote there: if they even try it, McLame and Hitlery will make sure that Frist gets at least 50 votes Aye.

No one who has any aspirations of being president wants their picks for Cabinet positions subject to the whims of the 40 "whackiest" Senators from the other side of the aisle.


1,141 posted on 06/09/2005 4:56:11 PM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1004 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson