Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vannrox
Thanks for posting this article.

A few years ago, I went to an exhibit at the Hirshhorn Gallery (part of the Smithsonian) in Washington, DC. The exhibit was entitled "Visions", or something similar. The theme of the exhibit was the future of American Modern Art.

One thing I saw in that exhibit revealed to me how utterly vapid and barren the current notion of "art" is.

What I saw was a pile of bricks. The pile of bricks -- the sort of thing one would see at a construction site -- was, somehow, "art" -- because it was being exhibited in a Museum. If I had seen the same pile of outside the museum, it would have not been art -- the "artistic elite" had proclaimed it art, and so, according to them, it was "art".

90 posted on 06/09/2005 8:12:57 AM PDT by chs68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: chs68
There was a show on our local PBS station a few years ago about the Art Institute of Chicago. It was really neat. They gave the history of the institute. They spoke to all the curators of the different departments and they all highlighted some of the most famous pieces in each of the collections and how they came to reside at the Institute.

The funniest (in a sad way) part of the show was the modern art segment. There is a "piece" that is nothing but a big pile of candy in the corner. The curator said it had something to do with AIDS and the fleeting nature of life.
94 posted on 06/09/2005 8:22:53 AM PDT by retrokitten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

To: chs68
OMG. They actually have it featured on the AIC website.


From 1986 until his death in 1996, Felix Gonzalez-Torres produced a prolific body of work, transforming everyday objects—clocks, light bulbs, candy—into profound meditations on love and loss. This installation is an allegorical portrait of the artist’s partner, Ross Laycock, who died of an AIDS-related illness in 1991. The 175 pounds of candy correspond to an ideal body weight, and viewers are encouraged to take a piece. The diminishing amount of candy symbolically refers to Laycock’s body languishing from disease. The artist has made sure that the art survives, however, by instructing that the candies be continuously replaced. In the simplest of forms, and with the participation of both his audience and the museum staff, Gonzalez-Torres comments on personal pain and the endurance of art, while challenging traditional museum practices and expectations of museum visitors.

96 posted on 06/09/2005 8:28:25 AM PDT by retrokitten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

To: chs68
What I saw was a pile of bricks.

Also at the Hirshhorn Gallery they had video of a woman sucking her toes on a loop and called it art. I was glad admission was free.

104 posted on 06/09/2005 9:01:04 AM PDT by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson