Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Rich & the Government, Friends Forever - Debunking the latest round of class warfare.
NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE.COM ^ | JUNE 8, 2005 | LARRY KUDLOW, Economics Editor

Posted on 06/08/2005 4:53:31 PM PDT by CHARLITE

It is impossible that the Bush tax cuts of June 2003 contributed to relatively lower tax payments by the very richest Americans in 2002. But New York Times writer David Cay Johnston conveniently avoids this fact in his Sunday front-page article, “Richest Leaving Even the Rich Far Behind,” which used tax-payment data that ended in 2002 to extend the class-warfare argument. Is this just more garden-variety Bush-bashing from the newspaper of record?

I’d also like to know why Johnston never mentions the fact that the wealthiest Americans suffered the most in the stock market plunge and asset deflation of 2000-02. One reason the richest seemed to pay less in taxes during this period is that they were the hardest hit during the deflation.

Johnston singles out the top 145,000 taxpayers who comprise the top 0.1 percent of income distribution in 2002. Their average income was $3 million, two-and-a-half times the inflation-adjusted $1.2 million that the group reported in 1980. My gosh — how dare they be successful earners and investors?

Over that 22-year span, this group probably included the very same people who launched tens of thousands of new companies that hired roughly 40 million net new workers that completely revolutionized the U.S. economy through unbelievable breakthroughs in the realms of information technology, communications, finance, health care, and retailing.

Should we go out and shoot these 145,000 for their success?

These entrepreneurs use their God-given talents within the Reaganesque free-market framework that deregulated, slashed tax rates, and provided the first strong dose of economic incentives since the 1920s. A rising economic tide over the last 20 years has lifted living standards, productivity, and employment throughout America. Everyone got richer, with a full $39 trillion in new wealth created during this period. That’s why the unemployment rate has been averaging 5 percent over the past 10 years, with non-financial productivity running about 5 percent and inflation virtually nil.

Of course, the bulk of Bush’s 2003 tax cuts on dividends and capital gains will help people with the highest incomes, but they pay the most taxes in the first place. The tax cuts will also help the entire 100-million-strong investor class — about 50 percent of U.S. households. But when the new IRS income statistics for 2004 and 2005 are published, we will undoubtedly find that lower tax rates — particularly on investment — have again generated much higher tax collections for the so-called richest among us. Already, for the twelve months ending April 2005, non-withheld tax receipts (read capital gains and dividends) rose an astronomical 36 percent.

There’s nothing new here. Through 2001, a tiny one-tenth of 1 percent of U.S. taxpayers generated a hefty 16 percent of total tax collections. That’s brainpower plus initiative, aided and abetted by the incentive to keep more of what you earn and thus work with more intensity and purpose. Meanwhile the top 1 percent paid 34 percent of tax collections, the top 5 percent paid 53 percent, the top 10 percent paid 65 percent, the top 25 percent paid 83 percent, and the top 50 percent paid 96 percent. These “rich people” are government’s best friend.

This week in the Wall Street Journal, Gotz Aly, a professor of Holocaust research at the University of Frankfurt, talked about the “rotten achievement” of the German economy, where policymakers obsess over the “equalization of living standards.” Germans have an “equality sickness” that makes them dependent on the welfare state. Is that what David Cay Johnston has in mind for America?

Nations engaged in punishing the rich and leveling income and wealth through high taxes and resource redistribution have always failed. These were the goals of the socialist and communist regimes following WWII, in particular old Russia and its satellites. The size and scope of these failures, and the related deprivation of democracy and human rights, ultimately led to the downfall of communism and the rise of free-market capitalism, with its attendant privileges of free-election democracy and sweeping new human rights. This very transition is now occurring in the once darkest corners of the Middle East.

The economic failure of income- and wealth-leveling is more and more apparent today. The stagnant economies of socialist Old Europe are falling further and further behind the free-market capitalist models of the U.S. and Britain. Milton Friedman’s great 1962 book, Capitalism and Freedom, should be read by all inhabitants of Old Europe. He offered a way out. Twenty-odd years later, Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher put Friedman’s ideas into political and economic action. The startlingly positive results are being copied by India and China, if not inevitably by France, Germany, and Italy.

This is a thought for the ages … and for Mr. David Cay Johnston.

Larry Kudlow, NRO’s Economics Editor, is host of CNBC’s Kudlow & Company and author of the daily web blog, Kudlow’s Money Politic$.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: american; capitalism; classwarfare; communism; economics; failures; georgewbush; income; jobcreation; kudlow; prosperity; socialism; taxcuts; therich
"Nations engaged in punishing the rich and leveling income and wealth through high taxes and resource redistribution have always failed."
1 posted on 06/08/2005 4:53:33 PM PDT by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
True.

But every once and a while the rich need to be taught a lesson.

Surly you do not say the people were better off under rich Kings.

Neither would you say they were better of under rich Dictators.

Well now America seems to be scumming to the lowest elements among the rich. The Wal*Marts, KMarts, Pep Boys, large corporate farms etc. All are forcing the pay of the majority of Americans lower and lower. Eventually these poor will rise up and rebel against those who could care less about they. The rich rulers of America are becoming little better than Kings and Dictators.

No longer can a poor person become a Senator or even a Representative. Neither are they listened to.

It used to be that the Democrats listened about low wages but now the Democrats are so corrupt by bowing down to their corporate donors that they could care less. Furthermore they are for everything evil in America Abortion, Murder of the Cripple's and old, the enemies of America. They are an America last party. You can no longer hold your nose and vote for them to increase the minimum wage then vote them out before they do too much damage.

Thus the poor need to force the Republican party to listen to them and end the Corporate Greed that is so rampant in America. It is destroying America. The doers seem blind to what they are doing.

If they are allowed to continue it won't be long before America is no longer the greatest country on earth. The poor will have had enough will organize and eventually throw both parties out of power. All that is needed is the right leader and a few more years of caring less about the lower 50%.
2 posted on 06/08/2005 8:14:16 PM PDT by ImphClinton (Four More Years Go Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImphClinton

It's overly simplistic to look at everything from a purely economic standpoint. The big fact that Kudlow fails to mention is the majority of the mega-Rich are very much in favor of big government, racial preferences, abortion, gay marriage, etc. Soros, Gates, Buffet, Lewis (Progressive Ins), the Hollywood gang, Silicon Valley high-rollers, the foundations, etc, etc are all quite leftist. One of the reasons is that high-rollers can afford the Jesse Jackson shakedowns, the lawyers to avoid taxes, the grunts to fill out forms for endless regulations, and the those to do the real work while the mandated racial preference hires sit and collect paychecks for talking on the phone. The two guys in a garage somewhere who are now thinking of hiring some people can't afford these luxuries. That's the way the big players like it. They are not communists or socialists, but endorse a "third-way" to achieve the utopia of free-and-equal supermen (themselves) ruling over the great unwashed first formulated by Antonio Gramsci.

To top it off, there' a vast system of corporate welfare that the big government provides both directly and indirectly. Government keeps the borders wide open so that unskilled wages keep falling (in real terms) thanks to the "vast army of the unemployed" in neighboring third world oligarchies. It issues H1B visas, so that even the skilled workers find themselves replaced by indentured servants or overseas boilerooms. Government facilitates "free trade" so that goods made with child and slave labor, no evironmental or safety controls can enter the country as easily as Mexicans walk across the border.

Additional corporate handouts are provided to the likes of Wal-Mart and Tyson by the vast array of welfare, free medical care, racial preferences, special mortgage programs, and education benefits handed out to immigrants - illegal and legal. Private property is seized via eminent domain to benefit developer cronies. Insurance companies and HMOs commit medical malpractice (by overruling doctors' orders) for the sake of profit and are utterly immune from lawsuits - thanks to the Supreme Court. Meanwhile the remaining private doctors, who enjoy no such immunity, are forced out of business by escalating malpractice premiums generated by trial lawyers. We are rapidly becoming what Europe and Latin America already are, a nation of sheep ruled by socialist oligarchs and kleptocrat political lackeys with a thin facade of "democracy" and "free enterprise."


3 posted on 06/08/2005 10:56:19 PM PDT by Bogolyubski (Liberalism - a terminal mental illness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson