Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Claim: Sitting Too Close to the TV Is Bad for Your Eyes
NY Times ^ | June 7, 2005 | ANAHAD O'CONNOR

Posted on 06/07/2005 8:01:09 PM PDT by neverdem

THE FACTS It was more than 70 years ago that television sets first went on sale in the United States, and perhaps it was just as long ago that a cautious mother, noticing a son or daughter propped in front of that mesmerizing new invention, snapped and barked the words that generations of children would grow up hearing: "Don't sit so close; you'll ruin your eyesight!"

Now, scientists can say with certainty that the age-old warning is outdated.

Before the 1950's, television sets emitted levels of radiation that after repeated and extended exposure could have heightened the risk of eye problems in some people, said Dr. Norman Saffra, the chairman of ophthalmology at Maimonides Medical Center in Brooklyn.

But modern televisions are built with proper shielding, so radiation is no longer an issue. "It's not an old wives' tale; it's an old technology tale," Dr. Saffra said. "Based on the world our grandmothers lived and grew up in, it was an appropriate recommendation."

While concentrating on a screen for hours on end may not cause blindness, it can lead to eyestrain. Keeping the room fairly well lighted while the television is on and peeling your eyes from the screen for an occasional break can prevent this.

Parents should also be alert for the child who keeps creeping closer to the screen. Not because of radiation, of course, but because the child may need glasses.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: eyesight; health; medicine; vision
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 06/07/2005 8:01:09 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Do you realize that by linking to NYSlimes website you help them make a lot of advertising dollars?


2 posted on 06/07/2005 8:02:05 PM PDT by soccer_linux_mozilla (I believe in the potential of Open Source software: Linux, Mozilla, Firefox, OpenOffice,etc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: soccer_linux_mozilla
The NYSlimes is whats bad for your eyes and health.
3 posted on 06/07/2005 8:03:44 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I'm still going to yell at the kids to move away from the TV with the warning that it's bad for their eyes because when they sit in front of the television I can't see. The warning, real or imagined, only gives my words the sense of urgency that it takes to make them move their lazy rears.


4 posted on 06/07/2005 8:04:11 PM PDT by SittinYonder (Tancredo and I wanna know what you believe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem


Nowadays, it's sitting too close to our computers screens.


5 posted on 06/07/2005 8:05:58 PM PDT by onyx (Pope John Paul II - May 18, 1920 - April 2, 2005 = SANTO SUBITO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato; JudyB1938; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; ..
Can a Blood Test Predict Your Child's Autism Risk?

FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.

6 posted on 06/07/2005 8:06:12 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Ping.


7 posted on 06/07/2005 8:08:20 PM PDT by mowkeka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Reading the NYT is bad for your eyes... Not to mention the rest of your body.


8 posted on 06/07/2005 8:14:43 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The Claim: Sitting Too Close to the TV Is Bad for Your Eyes

Depends on what you're watchin'.
9 posted on 06/07/2005 8:23:44 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (If you must filibuster, it's because you don't have the votes to win honestly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Mom's used to yell, "Don't sit so close (to the TV); you'll ruin your eyesight!"

They also told us that "choking the chicken"/"spanking the monkey" would make us go blind.

I just did it til I needed glasses.

10 posted on 06/07/2005 8:26:23 PM PDT by DocH (Gun-grabbers, you can HAVE my guns... lead first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem


"Don't sit so close; you'll ruin your eyesight!"

Other popular warnings....

"Don`t climb that tree, you`ll break your neck!"

"If you keep making that face it will stay that way!"

"You`re not getting a BB gun, you`ll shoot your eye out!"

"If you put that grenade in your mouth and pull the pin, you`ll blow your head off!"



11 posted on 06/07/2005 8:35:36 PM PDT by EdHallick ("KAAAAAAAAAAHN!" - Capt. James T. Kirk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for the ping.


12 posted on 06/07/2005 8:42:57 PM PDT by GOPJ (Merit matters. Okrent earned respect. Arthur Sulzberger Jr picked the right parents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: soccer_linux_mozilla
Do you realize that by linking to NYSlimes website you help them make a lot of advertising dollars?

Do you realize that the following story is on the NY Times front page.

Senator Clinton Assails Bush and G.O.P. at Campaign Fund-Raiser

longtermmemmory wrote:

and yet the MSM will not cover this speech for one second.

This insanity should be put side by side to show hitlary is further left than even dean.

her own words condemn her.

12 posted on 06/06/2005 3:07:35 PM EDT by longtermmemmory

To answer your question, yes, information is not free. When someone can show me a conservative newspaper that matches the coverage of the Times, including health and science topics, I'll be glad to switch from the Times.

13 posted on 06/07/2005 8:44:08 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The problem today is the drunken cameramen, and producers high on drugs.

The resulting show is about as meanigful as looking into a kalidascope. With the constant motions of the video, the endless half second snapshots, there never is a clear shot of what it is they are pretending to be showing the audience.

I think it has to have a big negative impact on young minds.
I used to enjoy shows on big equipment, ships, bridges etc. I no longer even turn them on as they just infuriate me because they never show anything but a 1 or 2 minute total clear shot during a half hour program.


14 posted on 06/07/2005 8:53:55 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed Republicans with really stupid enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance

You mean that I'll go blind watching Paris Hilton wash a car! Yeekes!


15 posted on 06/07/2005 9:01:11 PM PDT by TaMoDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

To be fair, the Discovery Channel's "Deadliest Catch" has had some great photography. Some of the best video I've seen recently.


16 posted on 06/07/2005 9:01:21 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Actually, the radiation was harmful. Most of the kids who ignored the warnings and sat too close to the TV in the 1950s need reading glasses today.
17 posted on 06/07/2005 9:02:36 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

Virtually everyone who was a kid in the 1950s needs reading glasses today (or CK)... it is called presbyopia - a natural aging of the accommodative system due to lens hardening.


18 posted on 06/07/2005 9:47:09 PM PDT by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
Actually, the radiation was harmful. Most of the kids who ignored the warnings and sat too close to the TV in the 1950s need reading glasses today.

Hey, we didn't even HAVE a tv till the 60s, and I STILL need glasses! No fair!

19 posted on 06/07/2005 10:42:05 PM PDT by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: EdHallick

Can't believe you left out "running with scissors!"....


20 posted on 06/07/2005 10:44:18 PM PDT by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson