Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mariabush

He might be in your opinion...however...what do you think of Hillary winning or for that matter any democrat?


63 posted on 06/07/2005 6:29:33 AM PDT by Alex Marko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: Alex Marko

Won't happen!!!!!!!!


68 posted on 06/07/2005 6:34:04 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek ('We voted like we prayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Marko
Where are you from Mr. Marko? Giuliani may be a giant in New York, but if you recall, he was't even favored the beat Hillary for the Senate! If the Republicans ran him, that is the surest way to draw a significant candidate to run 3rd party. Giuliani is at heart a Democrat, heck he still endorses them regularly! With Giuliani on the top of the ticket, the base of the Republican party stays home and we lose Congress.

Giuliani:
The USA voters:
Pro partial-birth abortion overwhelmingly against PBA
Pro homosexual legal-civil unions overwhelmingly against homo-unions
On marriage #3 with messy divorces cheating against adultery, especially flagrant open adultery while in office
Marched in homosexual parades Disgusted by parades that feature NAMBLA


Add to that he is anti-gun. Oh, and he is not much of a tax cutter from what I recall either. I don't know about you, but I am a Republican BECAUSE I am a conservative. Since this is "FREE REPUBLIC" and not "ANY REPUBLICAN IS BETTER THAN ANY DEMOCRAT," I will not support Giuliani and will vote 3rd party before I vote for him. Giuliani cannot win, and the only reason to run him would be to disenfranchise the base of the party. The Giulianis and the Christine Todd "It's My Party and I'll Cry If I want to, too" Whitmans have to repent, or find another home.
124 posted on 06/07/2005 7:57:57 AM PDT by sittnick (There's no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Marko; ninenot; sittnick; dubyaismypresident; Petronski; GraniteStateConservative
AM: On your home page, you have very little other than an American flag in lieu of a state of residence and a statement to the effect that "Extremism in defense of liberty is no crime."

You apparently believe that Giuliani is a principled and even moral man. You advance him as a potential GOP candidate NOT pf principle but of modeartion. What to make of this combination of factors?

Apparently support for abortion does not disqualify as immorality in your estimation, nor cross-dressing nor support for so-called "rights" of lavenders. Those apparently qualify Rudy Giuliani as a "moderate."

Since you see Rudy as a "moderate." His social revolutionary stands must not seem extreme to you. What sort of extreme do you think is praiseworthy and yet not disqualifying? Money???? Extreme libertarian social revolution? Randianism???????

Your insistent resort to "moderation" as a requirement for winning GOP Candidates smacks of nothing more than the discredited old Northeastern Liberal pack of the 1960s, warmed over Rockefellerism. If you think that morality is none of the government's business and you imagine yourself conservative or Republican, you are in the wrong political party.

I look forward to the 2008 GOP primaries which will put an end to "moderation" in the GOP once and for all just before we dispose of Mrs. Arkansas Antichrist.

149 posted on 06/07/2005 9:47:43 AM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson