You apparently believe that Giuliani is a principled and even moral man. You advance him as a potential GOP candidate NOT pf principle but of modeartion. What to make of this combination of factors?
Apparently support for abortion does not disqualify as immorality in your estimation, nor cross-dressing nor support for so-called "rights" of lavenders. Those apparently qualify Rudy Giuliani as a "moderate."
Since you see Rudy as a "moderate." His social revolutionary stands must not seem extreme to you. What sort of extreme do you think is praiseworthy and yet not disqualifying? Money???? Extreme libertarian social revolution? Randianism???????
Your insistent resort to "moderation" as a requirement for winning GOP Candidates smacks of nothing more than the discredited old Northeastern Liberal pack of the 1960s, warmed over Rockefellerism. If you think that morality is none of the government's business and you imagine yourself conservative or Republican, you are in the wrong political party.
I look forward to the 2008 GOP primaries which will put an end to "moderation" in the GOP once and for all just before we dispose of Mrs. Arkansas Antichrist.
In NO way do i advocate the "moderatization" of the GOP. Such a statment is irresponsible on your part. An endeavor like that would be something that would have to be done across the board including senate and congressional seats. I am simply stating a moderate nominee would give the best chance of the GOP winning the WH in 08 in hopes of keeping our dominance in US politics.
Hillary is NOT a moderate. She does not fool anyone in the US with her antics. If she runs, we win hands down.