[Alex Marko]

In NO way do i advocate the "moderatization" of the GOP. Such a statment is irresponsible on your part. An endeavor like that would be something that would have to be done across the board including senate and congressional seats. I am simply stating a moderate nominee would give the best chance of the GOP winning the WH in 08 in hopes of keeping our dominance in US politics.

Hillary is NOT a moderate. She does not fool anyone in the US with her antics. If she runs, we win hands down.

[BlackElk]

If we nominate a "moderate" candidate: pro-abort?????? pro-lavender "make-believe marriage"???? pro-gun control???? anti-war and anti-military (sniff, sniff, war is just sooooo awful!!!!!!) favor tax increases?????? Just on WHAT do you want your GOP candidate for president to MODERATE?????? If he/she does, what is the difference between Demonrats and "Moderate Republicans" other than the pace at which our society is destroyed?

If we abandon our conservative principles, WE do NOT continue OUR dominance of American politics. This war is NOT R vs D but CONSERVATIVE VS. THE DREADED L WORD.

If Hilary will lose in any event, then by all means let us nominate a charming and electable bomb-thrower and make even quicker gains in the restoration of civilization in the USA and in the restoration of the USA.