Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: scripter

Society got smart and ostracized tobacco use because it poses a great health risk. While confronted with a bigger health risk--male homosexuality--society does its damnedest to promote it as a valid lifestyle.


6 posted on 06/06/2005 10:55:16 PM PDT by PeoplesRepublicOfWashington (Washington State--Land of Court-approved Voting Fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PeoplesRepublicOfWashington

As much as libs frown on smoking for its risk to health and longevity, you'd think they'd pay a little attention to homosexual behavior.


11 posted on 06/06/2005 10:58:34 PM PDT by AZLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: PeoplesRepublicOfWashington

Indeed - it makes no sense to promote, encourage and celebrate any lifestyle that causes such severe health hazards, especially deadly health hazards.


13 posted on 06/06/2005 11:00:12 PM PDT by scripter (Tens of thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: PeoplesRepublicOfWashington
Maybe the Guv. can try to tax it out of existence.
62 posted on 06/07/2005 5:53:51 AM PDT by seemoAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: PeoplesRepublicOfWashington
Society got smart and ostracized tobacco use because it poses a great health risk.

If that was all they did, it would be valid.

69 posted on 06/07/2005 7:09:05 AM PDT by Protagoras (I’ve had all I can stands and I can’t stands no more.....Popeye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: PeoplesRepublicOfWashington
Society got smart and ostracized tobacco use because it poses a great health risk

Well...that's the sanitized version anyway.

72 posted on 06/07/2005 7:18:09 AM PDT by Osage Orange (Hillary Clinton is about as welcome as an egg-sucking dog...in my neck of the woods.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: PeoplesRepublicOfWashington
Society got smart and ostracized tobacco use because it poses a great health risk.

Surely you're not referring to the second-hand smoke myth? That's nothing but socialist propaganda. Firsthand smoke is what smokers should be concerned with.

Private businesses of all types have the right (whether it is honored or not) to determine their own policies with respect to tobacco use.

If any individual doesn't want to work for or patronize an establishment because of its smoking policies, he or she has every right to take their business or their labor elsewhere.

It's this same mamby-pamby collectivist mentality which fuels gun control, the drug war, anti-smoking zealots, etc.

I have never smoked tobacco and think it's worthless, but I firmly support the rights of smokers to light up without big brother telling them where they can and cannot do it.

Arbitrary Law is never the proper role of Minimal Government, and anti-smoking fascists are using blatant propaganda to foment their Authoritarianism on individuals and private business.

Whether the tobacco industry itself is sleazy and corrupt is a separate issue. It appears to be corrupt to a significant degree, given the extra poisonous crap that they add to cigarettes. Maybe there's something legally actionable there.

For instance, here in Florida, Jeb Bush used a settlement with Big Tobacco to fully fund universal health care for chilfren in the state.

Does anyone know where I can get some tobacco seeds?

80 posted on 06/07/2005 7:38:14 AM PDT by sargon (How could anyone have voted for the socialist, weak-on-defense fraud named John Kerry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson