Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Kerry Reportedly To Present "Downing Street Memo" To Congress (New Info)
All Headline News ^ | 06-05-2005 | Douglas Maher

Posted on 06/05/2005 10:27:40 AM PDT by My Favorite Headache

John Kerry Reportedly To Present "Downing Street Memo" To Congress

June 5, 2005 7:36 a.m. EST

Douglas Maher - All Headline News Staff Reporter

Washington,D.C. (AHN)- After remaining almost silent since losing the 2004 election by thirty four electoral votes, Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts is reportedly planning to to present Congress with The Downing Street Memo, reported last month by the London Times.

The memo purports to include minutes from a July 2002 meeting with Tony Blair, in which Blair allegedly said that President Bush's administration "fixed" intelligence on Iraq in order to justify the Iraqi war.

The Downing Street Memo is a leaked Top Secret document that details the minutes of a 2002 meeting between top-level British and American government officials.

The memo states that George Bush "was determined" to attack Iraq long before going to Congress with the matter, and that "the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."

Rumblings across Washington and the Internet claim this is a step from Democrats towards impeachment of President Bush.

Fellow Democrat Rep. John Conyers of Michigan has issued a statement on the U.S. House of Representatives stating that he is seeking information regarding the meeting minutes.

"I am seeking information regarding the charges made in the so-called “Downing Street Minutes” that there was a secret agreement between the U.S. and the U..K to invade Iraq by the summer of 2002, well before the president sought congressional authority." Conyers said.

"Please provide us with any information or leads you might have regarding such a secret pre-war deal, or other efforts to manipulate intelligence or provoke a response to justify war. We will treat any information provided on this site as confidential. Thank you for your assistance in this important matter."

However, All Headline News has re-discovered that a bill signed by then President Clinton named "The Iraqi Liberation Act of 1998" gave President Bush all of the legal recourse necessary for the war.

Stating directly from the bill: "Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 - Declares that it should be the policy of the United States to seek to remove the Saddam Hussein regime from power in Iraq and to replace it with a democratic government. "

The H.R. 4655 law was signed into effect October 31,1998.

Republicans plan to issue a response to Senator Kerry by using his own words against him, a tactic used in the 2004 Election. Where Sen. Kerry was quoted as saying the war was justified and Saddam Hussein needed to be removed.

Copyright © All Headline News - All rights reserved.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: 109th; 43; approvalfromallies; britishmemo; bush; clinton; deepthroatdodo; democratsarescum; downingstreetgate; downingstreetmemo; dummiesaredelusional; globletest; hanoijohn; hanoijohnny; hr4655; ichabodcrane; impeachment; implosion; imrickjamesbitch; iraq; iraqiliberationact; iraqliberationact; iwasanaltarboy; iwasinvietnam; johnwho; karlrovespecial; kerry; kerrythetraitor; loser; memoisstpuid; memowillnotwork; oprtniraqifreedom; pos; ratsnotonourside; rovedoesitagain; signthe180; skullvsbone; sourgrapes; tenoftenterrorists; terayzasgigolo; unfitforcommand; war; wearewatchingyoujohn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 261-268 next last
To: defconw

Considering that he was the Governor for that long and I didn't know that he was the Governor, pretty much speaks for itself---

Most Governors that have anything on the ball, make themselves known countrywide, somehow...but alas, he didn't!!!


161 posted on 06/05/2005 7:32:26 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

bttt


162 posted on 06/05/2005 7:37:40 PM PDT by TheEaglehasLanded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth



A most telling observation. I live in Indiana which is probably the ONLY reason that I know he was in fact a Governor! He's a ghost in the Senate as well as here at home. I am not sure that he actually is a real person, or a caricature! "Wag the Dog"? "Dave"?


163 posted on 06/05/2005 7:42:55 PM PDT by defconw (GEORGE ALLEN IN 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
After remaining almost silent since losing the 2004 election by thirty four electoral votes, Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts is reportedly planning to to present Congress with The Downing Street Memo, reported last month by the London Times.

Sorry, 'almost' just isn't good enough.

164 posted on 06/05/2005 7:50:27 PM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
It's a little disturbing too, because it's such warped behavior coming from alleged statesmen...

What sane person ever accused Kerry or Conyers of being statesmen?

'Tis disturbing because the 'Rats are so anti-American and in lock step 'Rat uber alles that you know damn well they'd impeach any 'Ican president if they had a majority in the House, and convict him--regardless of the evidence--if they had a supermajority in the Senate. The 'Rat Party can never again be allowed to gain power in the country, not if we want this country to survive.

165 posted on 06/05/2005 8:08:49 PM PDT by PeoplesRepublicOfWashington (Re-elect Dino Rossi in 2005!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

The life-long traitor continues his pattern of giving aid and comfort to the enemy.


166 posted on 06/05/2005 8:38:15 PM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub

Thanks for the ping!


167 posted on 06/05/2005 8:41:56 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: defconw

Just heard the most amazing thing on Drudge---

He said that the 9/11 Commission has set itself up as a citizen oversight group--privately funded...

They plan on holding hearings about how the Bush Administration has failed in the WOT to protect us...and they sent a letter to Andy Card telling him that they are requesting TOP SECRET memos and investigation results and such from the CIA and FBI to use in conducting these hearings...

NOW, understand these are just citizens being paid privately (Soros?).

Like Drudge said, these people NOW are no more "credentialed" to do this than the Minutemen are on the borders...and yet the dems are screaming about the MM..

Since when should private groups be able to demand TOP SECRET information, anyway?


168 posted on 06/05/2005 8:43:06 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
I expect to soon find Reynolds wrap in my local grocery store renamed Kerry wrap, he is cornering the market on tin foil.
169 posted on 06/05/2005 8:45:59 PM PDT by TheForceOfOne (My tagline is currently being blocked by Congressional filibuster for being to harsh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR

I read an article today that said Dean won't be head of the DNC much longer because he's been unable to draw campaign contributions. Some want to donate but not while Dean is at the helm.


170 posted on 06/05/2005 9:20:35 PM PDT by Fruit of the Spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
You could take all of the "substance" from Edwards and Bayh and put it in a cup and have room left over....

The perfect Dummo ticket.

171 posted on 06/05/2005 10:25:36 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Dems, the annoying vegetarians of politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Hey John you would have to get rid of a lot of people for you to get the job of President. And if you did become pres. we would impeach you for being a traitor.


172 posted on 06/05/2005 10:30:33 PM PDT by Brimack34 (Why does the MSM hate our military?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica

Articles of impeachment are brought by the House of Reps. There is not a snowball's chance in hell that the republican-controlled US House is going to support impeachment of a republican president except in the most extraordinary, absolutely provable major crime that one can imagine.

This silliness doesn't even begin to fit that picture.

This is all media play.


173 posted on 06/06/2005 2:09:49 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq
hanoi Kerry is at it again....

But he still won't show his own documents.

174 posted on 06/06/2005 2:24:11 AM PDT by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pride in the USA
They are beginning to see the light, thanks to all the shenanigans that are being pulled by the libs in power.

Well, at least that's good news. We can hope that there are a lot more former liberals voting in 2008.

175 posted on 06/06/2005 2:43:10 AM PDT by lonevoice (Vast Right Wing Pajama Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub


176 posted on 06/06/2005 3:12:01 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Bring out 'cher dead.... bring out 'cher dead.........

((((( THUMP ))))))

'ere now... I ain't dead yet".......


177 posted on 06/06/2005 3:34:27 AM PDT by roaddog727 (The marginal propensity to save is 1 minus the marginal propensity to consume.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
After remaining almost silent since losing the 2004 election by thirty four electoral votes

AFTER LOSING THE 2004ELECTION.

Take away inner city Dem. voter fraud and it was a slaughter.

178 posted on 06/06/2005 3:40:15 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Sounds of laughter, shades of life are ringing through my open ears exciting and inviting me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

Has he mailed in his signed SF180 yet?


179 posted on 06/06/2005 3:44:05 AM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Enrolled as Agreed to or Passed by Both House and Senate)

--H.J.Res.114--

H.J.Res.114

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

Joint Resolution

To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq.

Whereas in 1990 in response to Iraq's war of aggression against and illegal occupation of Kuwait, the United States forged a coalition of nations to liberate Kuwait and its people in order to defend the national security of the United States and enforce United Nations Security Council resolutions relating to Iraq;

Whereas after the liberation of Kuwait in 1991, Iraq entered into a United Nations sponsored cease-fire agreement pursuant to which Iraq unequivocally agreed, among other things, to eliminate its nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons programs and the means to deliver and develop them, and to end its support for international terrorism;

Whereas the efforts of international weapons inspectors, United States intelligence agencies, and Iraqi defectors led to the discovery that Iraq had large stockpiles of chemical weapons and a large scale biological weapons program, and that Iraq had an advanced nuclear weapons development program that was much closer to producing a nuclear weapon than intelligence reporting had previously indicated;

Whereas Iraq, in direct and flagrant violation of the cease-fire, attempted to thwart the efforts of weapons inspectors to identify and destroy Iraq's weapons of mass destruction stockpiles and development capabilities, which finally resulted in the withdrawal of inspectors from Iraq on October 31, 1998;

Whereas in Public Law 105-235 (August 14, 1998), Congress concluded that Iraq's continuing weapons of mass destruction programs threatened vital United States interests and international peace and security, declared Iraq to be in `material and unacceptable breach of its international obligations' and urged the President `to take appropriate action, in accordance with the Constitution and relevant laws of the United States, to bring Iraq into compliance with its international obligations';

Whereas Iraq both poses a continuing threat to the national security of the United States and international peace and security in the Persian Gulf region and remains in material and unacceptable breach of its international obligations by, among other things, continuing to possess and develop a significant chemical and biological weapons capability, actively seeking a nuclear weapons capability, and supporting and harboring terrorist organizations;

Whereas Iraq persists in violating resolution of the United Nations Security Council by continuing to engage in brutal repression of its civilian population thereby threatening international peace and security in the region, by refusing to release, repatriate, or account for non-Iraqi citizens wrongfully detained by Iraq, including an American serviceman, and by failing to return property wrongfully seized by Iraq from Kuwait;

Whereas the current Iraqi regime has demonstrated its capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction against other nations and its own people;

Whereas the current Iraqi regime has demonstrated its continuing hostility toward, and willingness to attack, the United States, including by attempting in 1993 to assassinate former President Bush and by firing on many thousands of occasions on United States and Coalition Armed Forces engaged in enforcing the resolutions of the United Nations Security Council;

Whereas members of al Qaida, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq;

Whereas Iraq continues to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations, including organizations that threaten the lives and safety of United States citizens;

Whereas the attacks on the United States of September 11, 2001, underscored the gravity of the threat posed by the acquisition of weapons of mass destruction by international terrorist organizations;

Whereas Iraq's demonstrated capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction, the risk that the current Iraqi regime will either employ those weapons to launch a surprise attack against the United States or its Armed Forces or provide them to international terrorists who would do so, and the extreme magnitude of harm that would result to the United States and its citizens from such an attack, combine to justify action by the United States to defend itself;

Whereas United Nations Security Council Resolution 678 (1990) authorizes the use of all necessary means to enforce United Nations Security Council Resolution 660 (1990) and subsequent relevant resolutions and to compel Iraq to cease certain activities that threaten international peace and security, including the development of weapons of mass destruction and refusal or obstruction of United Nations weapons inspections in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 687 (1991), repression of its civilian population in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 688 (1991), and threatening its neighbors or United Nations operations in Iraq in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 949 (1994);

Whereas in the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102-1), Congress has authorized the President `to use United States Armed Forces pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 678 (1990) in order to achieve implementation of Security Council Resolution 660, 661, 662, 664, 665, 666, 667, 669, 670, 674, and 677';

Whereas in December 1991, Congress expressed its sense that it `supports the use of all necessary means to achieve the goals of United Nations Security Council Resolution 687 as being consistent with the Authorization of Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102-1),' that Iraq's repression of its civilian population violates United Nations Security Council Resolution 688 and `constitutes a continuing threat to the peace, security, and stability of the Persian Gulf region,' and that Congress, `supports the use of all necessary means to achieve the goals of United Nations Security Council Resolution 688';

Whereas the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-338) expressed the sense of Congress that it should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove from power the current Iraqi regime and promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime;

Whereas on September 12, 2002, President Bush committed the United States to `work with the United Nations Security Council to meet our common challenge' posed by Iraq and to `work for the necessary resolutions,' while also making clear that `the Security Council resolutions will be enforced, and the just demands of peace and security will be met, or action will be unavoidable';

Whereas the United States is determined to prosecute the war on terrorism and Iraq's ongoing support for international terrorist groups combined with its development of weapons of mass destruction in direct violation of its obligations under the 1991 cease-fire and other United Nations Security Council resolutions make clear that it is in the national security interests of the United States and in furtherance of the war on terrorism that all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions be enforced, including through the use of force if necessary;

Whereas Congress has taken steps to pursue vigorously the war on terrorism through the provision of authorities and funding requested by the President to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such persons or organizations;

Whereas the President and Congress are determined to continue to take all appropriate actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such persons or organizations;

Whereas the President has authority under the Constitution to take action in order to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism against the United States, as Congress recognized in the joint resolution on Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40); and

Whereas it is in the national security interests of the United States to restore international peace and security to the Persian Gulf region: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This joint resolution may be cited as the `Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002'.

SEC. 2. SUPPORT FOR UNITED STATES DIPLOMATIC EFFORTS.

The Congress of the United States supports the efforts by the President to--

(1) strictly enforce through the United Nations Security Council all relevant Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq and encourages him in those efforts; and

(2) obtain prompt and decisive action by the Security Council to ensure that Iraq abandons its strategy of delay, evasion and noncompliance and promptly and strictly complies with all relevant Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.

(a) AUTHORIZATION- The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to--

(1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and

(2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq.

(b) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATION- In connection with the exercise of the authority granted in subsection (a) to use force the President shall, prior to such exercise or as soon thereafter as may be feasible, but no later than 48 hours after exercising such authority, make available to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate his determination that--

(1) reliance by the United States on further diplomatic or other peaceful means alone either (A) will not adequately protect the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq or (B) is not likely to lead to enforcement of all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq; and

(2) acting pursuant to this joint resolution is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorist and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.

(c) War Powers Resolution Requirements-

(1) SPECIFIC STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION- Consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution, the Congress declares that this section is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution.

(2) APPLICABILITY OF OTHER REQUIREMENTS- Nothing in this joint resolution supersedes any requirement of the War Powers Resolution.

SEC. 4. REPORTS TO CONGRESS.

(a) REPORTS- The President shall, at least once every 60 days, submit to the Congress a report on matters relevant to this joint resolution, including actions taken pursuant to the exercise of authority granted in section 3 and the status of planning for efforts that are expected to be required after such actions are completed, including those actions described in section 7 of the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-338).

(b) SINGLE CONSOLIDATED REPORT- To the extent that the submission of any report described in subsection (a) coincides with the submission of any other report on matters relevant to this joint resolution otherwise required to be submitted to Congress pursuant to the reporting requirements of the War Powers Resolution (Public Law 93-148), all such reports may be submitted as a single consolidated report to the Congress.

(c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION- To the extent that the information required by section 3 of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102-1) is included in the report required by this section, such report shall be considered as meeting the requirements of section 3 of such resolution.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.


180 posted on 06/06/2005 3:52:26 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 261-268 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson