Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We don't want to be the place where birds don't fly
St. Louis Post=Dispatch ^ | 06/04/2005 | Thomas Freidman

Posted on 06/04/2005 7:08:45 PM PDT by rwa265

This is an Excerpt

A few years ago, my youngest daughter participated in the National History Day program for eighth graders. The question that year was "turning points" in history, and my daughter's project was "How Sputnik Led to the Internet." I worry that 20 years from now, some eighth grader will be doing her National History Day project on how America's reaction to 9/11 unintentionally led to an erosion of core elements of American identity.

---------------

Bottom line: We urgently need a national commission to look at all the little changes we have made in response to 9/11 - from visa policies to research funding, to the way we've sealed off our federal buildings, to legal rulings around prisoners of war - and ask this question: Could it all add up in a way so that 20 years from now we will discover that some of America's cultural and legal essence - our DNA as a nation - has become badly deformed or mutated?

(Excerpt) Read more at stltoday.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911; freidman; september12era
Doesn't Mr. Freidman realize we are in the midst of a war against terrorism? And that hundreds, if not thousands, of madmen are plotting to cause a greater disaster than 9/11?

The bottom line for me is that in 20 years from now we will have won that war and will not need to suffer all the inconveniences that cause Mr. Friedman so much concern.

1 posted on 06/04/2005 7:08:46 PM PDT by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rwa265
Almost all federal buildings are operated as USPS facilities of one kind or the other. They've been "sealed off" for the most part from easy public access for a century and a half.

The biggest round of "hardenings" occurred in the 1920s when the country found itself under siege by leftwing mad bombers.

All this Friedman character could possibly be talking about are a few of the "external" truck barriers put in place around government buildings that also serve as "monuments" or representatives of institutions.

2 posted on 06/04/2005 7:11:50 PM PDT by muawiyah (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwa265
I can't think of a single government investigating committee that wasn't a participant to cover up.
3 posted on 06/04/2005 7:12:43 PM PDT by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwa265
"...America's reaction to 9/11 unintentionally led to an erosion of core elements of American identity. ... Bottom line: We urgently need a national commission to look at all the little changes we have made in response to 9/11 ... and ask this question: Could it all add up in a way so that 20 years from now we will discover that some of America's cultural and legal essence - our DNA as a nation - has become badly deformed or mutated?"

He can have his commission only if I can have a similar commission to investigate the real damage already done to this country by the Left.

4 posted on 06/04/2005 7:16:24 PM PDT by LibFreeOrDie (L'chaim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwa265
Well, I have strong concerns, similar to Mr. Friedman's, but I suspect for a different, perhaps opposite, reason.

I think that it is morally and rationally preferable to exclude totally and permanently a few hundred thousand undesireables from muslim countries, than grossly and permanently inconvenience 300,000,000 citizens and turn our country into an armed, paranoid, repressive camp, identical to the muslim's home countries.

5 posted on 06/04/2005 7:16:34 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Before)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwa265

Freidman needs to do some research on the sacrifices made circa 1942-1945. I don't think we lost anything by what had to be done then, certainly not the war.


6 posted on 06/04/2005 7:17:28 PM PDT by TADSLOS (Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
I think that it is morally and rationally preferable to exclude totally and permanently a few hundred thousand undesireables from muslim countries, than grossly and permanently inconvenience 300,000,000 citizens and turn our country into an armed, paranoid, repressive camp, identical to the muslim's home countries.

I couldn't have said it better.

7 posted on 06/04/2005 7:22:07 PM PDT by downwithsocialism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS
Freidman needs to do some research on the sacrifices made circa 1942-1945. I don't think we lost anything by what had to be done then, certainly not the war.We didn't????? Ever hear of the withholding tax???? It was a "temporary" measure imposed in 1942. They PROMISED it would end when the war ended. Funny, they never got around to it. The fact is that there has been a longstanding law-enforcement establishment that has wanted to batten this country down under a rigid, all-powerful national police regime for a long time. They are getting item after item on their wish list, in order to fight "terror." I agree with those who favor excluding large numbers of Muslims from other countries, and all illegal aliens, and maintaining more of the freedoms American citizens have a right to enjoy.
8 posted on 06/04/2005 7:25:32 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rwa265

Our reaction to 9-11 will gurantee his daughter will not have to fight a war of several orders of magnitude larger in the future. We fight today so they wont have to tomorrow.


9 posted on 06/04/2005 7:33:29 PM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwa265

Well we gotta be careful that we don't accidentally turn America into a police state in our efforts to make ourselves more secure. Politicians don't mind grabbing more power, especially when people nod their heads and smile. Just one of those things you gotta watch out for.


10 posted on 06/04/2005 7:33:43 PM PDT by Firefigher NC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwa265

In his hysteria, Friedman misses the point. The title of his daughter's assignment is "How Sputnik Led to the Internet." Get it, Tom? It's unpredictable.
In the late 1950s, the Soviets launched Sputnik and (many of us believed) could and would hit us with missiles. Instead (thanks to Reagan, Scoop Jackson, and other patriots), the Soviet Union is gone.
Could anyone, in 1957, have predicted that Sputnik would lead to the Internet?
As we spend money now on technology to fight terrorism, can anyone predict what technological discoveries lay ahead?
There are consequences, intended and not intended, from any action. It is the character of a nation that determines where those consequences lead.
I place my faith in the American people to determine our future. Not a panel of hand-wringing, fault-finding, nitpicking elitists.


11 posted on 06/04/2005 8:14:56 PM PDT by RedRover (Unfortunately, I live near the Clintons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson