Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Foul Felt
NRO ^ | June 03, 2005 | William F. Buckley Jr.

Posted on 06/03/2005 5:06:27 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: spanalot

"Nixon had NO involvement in any wrongdoing when Felt started squealing. The alleged coverup was months later."

Alleged coverup..? Nixon resigned because of it. To avoid impeachment. It's part of history. Get over it. He was a crook.


21 posted on 06/03/2005 6:25:47 PM PDT by hogwild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: xJones

" Does anyone know if the 91 year-old Mark Felt is still mentally competent? From some stories he has severe mental dementia, and from other stories he can be lucid.
....who's behind this this sudden revelation that seems so....opportunistic?"

The June 1 issue of the News Virginian , " On The Trail Of The Secret Informant " by J Todd Foster is a very interesting take on the author's dealing with the daughter and father, when he was freelancing for People magazine a few years ago. I tried linking ,but,this computer balks - a Google should do the trick.

The deal with People fell through when the daughter and the family lawyer demanded " a lot of money."
Foster referred the daughter to Harpers Collins who were willing to pay the Felts for the story, but, backed away when they could not substantiate the Felt's story.

"He was very impaired, and I thought he was dying," his daughter, Joan, told my writing partner.

" Felt soon moved into his daughter's basement. He was unhappy at the convalescent home and hard to manage by staff. He even spent all afternoon one day trying to reach the FBI, where he had retired more than 30 years earlier."

" He had dementia. And memory loss," his daughter said.
"He was extremely confused. He was up in the middle of the night [at the convalescent home], knocking on people's doors, thinking that he was doing investigations for the bureau."
Foster quotes occasions where his writing partner interviewed Felt and Felt denied being DT, denied knowing Woodward, thought DT was a fictional character, etc. Albeit after the stroke , but, he appeared lucid.

" It was only after prodding and coaching from his daughter and the family's attorney, John O'Connor of San Francisco, that Felt even gave his lukewarm admission."

Imagine Nancy Reagan doing to Ronald, what Ms Felt is doing to her father-pimping an old man with senility.
The apple doesn't fall far from the tree.


22 posted on 06/03/2005 6:26:19 PM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hogwild

"Nixon resigned because of it. "

In 1932, Stalin started WW 1.5 wherein he killed more than all soldiers killed in WW 1 - on both sides!

You did'nt know that?

Well fancy that - I wonder if it because of the coverup by the leftist MSM - Duranty and the NY Times even got a Pulitzer that year saying what a great job Papa joe did.

The same leftist press stabbed Nixon in the back.

You need to get over the perception that Nixon's efforts to find and stop the leak of confidential info from his subordinates to the leftist press was illegal.

Don't make the mistake of assuming that Nixon did the break-in - he did not.


23 posted on 06/03/2005 6:45:17 PM PDT by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: hogwild

Exactly what crimes was Nixon guilty of? Please specify, other than some Ben Bradlee/Carl Bernstein bilge about bringing down the Consitution. In 1979, Jaworski's chief deputy prosecutor admitted there was no way he could have gotten an indictment of Nixon due to the supposed "Watergate" scandal. Felt was CONVICTED of far more severe felonies than Nixon was ever accused of. Felt the hero so concerned about illegal wrongdoing by the White House but unconcerned about his own criminality doesn't quite connect; Felt the disappointed office seeker and scurrilous backstabbing tool of the liberal Washington elites does.


24 posted on 06/03/2005 6:59:52 PM PDT by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Felt, Woodward, and Bernstein could each be called a vigilante with an antisocial attitude.
25 posted on 06/03/2005 7:50:20 PM PDT by syriacus (MSM isn't idolizing Felt 100%. They must be afraid that some Liberal rocks will be turned over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laconic
Exactly what crimes was Nixon guilty of?

A full copy of the Article of Impeachment can be found here:

http://www.historyplace.com/unitedstates/impeachments/nixon.htm

He was a crook.

26 posted on 06/03/2005 8:06:45 PM PDT by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: hogwild
Hoover knew amd was complicit about Nixon's criminal acts. How could Felts have confided with him regarding his knowledge of such. He did the right thing.

Um, Hoover was dead by then. Felt was PO'd because he was passed over for the now open #1 slot. IMO, it was always about payback, I don't think Felt was smart enough to predict the dominos falling they way they did. I think he intended to make the new head and the administration suffer a bit not topple it to the ground. He didn't have Hoover's smarts or finesse obviously and it all got away from him. He completely misunderestimated the media's hatred of Nixon for being a commie hunter in the 50's.

27 posted on 06/03/2005 8:41:43 PM PDT by Valpal1 (Crush jihadists, drive collaborators before you, hear the lamentations of their media. Allahu FUBAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kinejoshua
Felt's not the one who directed burglary and obstructed justice

Perhaps you are unaware that Felt was convicted of the exact same type of operations as the Watergate bunglers and was later pardoned by the newly elected President Reagan.

He was Hoover's johnny boy and did not have clean hands.

Nixon was not the instigator of nor did he approve of the illegal acts done in his name, although he did try to assist his underlings in the resulting cover-up.

28 posted on 06/03/2005 8:47:52 PM PDT by Valpal1 (Crush jihadists, drive collaborators before you, hear the lamentations of their media. Allahu FUBAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

Sarge, I think you missed it.

Buckley is not, never will be, a purveyor of leftist tripe.

And his example of Ms. Lewinsky was put forth as the kind of thing a president should NOT be impeached for. Eeverything that fell from it, perjury, obstruction, etc., those ARE impeachable. He just didn't get around to listing them, as he was moving forward, making other points. My opinion.


29 posted on 06/03/2005 8:49:15 PM PDT by John Robertson (They think I'm working away, but I'm really Freeping.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

I think the proper phrase is "to shill for a buck".


30 posted on 06/03/2005 8:51:43 PM PDT by pankot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Old Sarge; glock rocks

Foul Felt

Not a word about silicone!


31 posted on 06/03/2005 9:20:43 PM PDT by B4Ranch ( Report every illegal alien that you meet. Call 866-347-2423, Employers use 888-464-4218)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein got rich, a president was disgraced, millions of innocent men, women and children died, Felt lives in his mothers garage, and for thirty years hid the facts that could have sent him to jail, we lost a war against communism, soldiers got spit on, and this is what the MSM thinks was the utopia of liberal journalism.

And the can't understand why we love the alternative new media, hate the MSM's guts, and take pleasure in their demise.
32 posted on 06/03/2005 9:30:33 PM PDT by TheForceOfOne (My tagline is currently being blocked by Congressional filibuster for being to harsh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinejoshua

Hmmm. Looks as though you came over here to gloat about your hero, Deep Throat. Must be rattling to you that Felt is a crook -- much more so than Nixon. No wonder you are upset.


33 posted on 06/03/2005 9:59:37 PM PDT by Kay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Big Horn

"He [Feldt] will always be known as a betrayer." Well, it depends upon who writes the History in the next few years. If the current leftist sycophancy known as the mainstream media writes it, Feldt will be lauded as a hero. If others write it, he will be a footnote as a petty little man angry at being passed over for promotion to run the very Bureau he defamed with his perfidy.


34 posted on 06/03/2005 10:11:55 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber

The Articles of Impeachment, huh? Written by that noted scribe of the law (and one of New Jersey's most courrpt politicians) Peter Rodino? Let's see: Nixon was supposedly guilty of bombing Cambodia -- that country had been used as a sanctuary by NVA troops for a decade with the complicity of its leaders. The Communists could fire at and kill our troops across the border who couldn't fight back so to protect American troops, Nixon defied Congress. Oh, what a crime! The beauty of this week's news is that the painting of Dorian Woodward-Bernstein finally shows its age in the wasted appartion of a bitter, greedy old man and his disgusting, ugly, family demanding money: the Watergate crap was not some shining moment for the Constitution played out by those with patriotic motives but a cheap, grubby attempt to "get back" by a passed-over bureaucrat and a politicl power play to steal an election by those who could never win it.


35 posted on 06/04/2005 2:12:43 AM PDT by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Big Horn
"Felt is a number two guy in a number two business. He will always be known as a betrayer."... in a number 2 agency. 90+ or not, he should be prosecuted, even if it is for stealing Government information.

Clinton was in bed with the Red Chinese. Where were the newspapers with their "Deep Throat" then? The info was leaked all over, but we didn't have any newspaper pursuing the matter.

36 posted on 06/04/2005 10:42:47 AM PDT by -=Wing_0_Walker=- (Don't spit in my eye and charge me for eyewash!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson