Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Keel Laid for First Littoral Combat Ship, USS Freedom
Navy NewsStand ^ | June 3, 2005 | unattributed

Posted on 06/03/2005 4:27:18 PM PDT by SandRat

MARINETTE, Wis. (NNS) -- The keel was laid and authenticated for the Navy's first Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) June 2 at Marinette Marine here.

The 378-foot LCS will be the first U.S. ship to carry this class designation.

"LCS Represents the cutting edge of a new Navy, the likes of which we have never seen before," said Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Vern Clark during his remarks at the ceremony. "It is a great personal privilege to confirm this keel on such a brave and bold future for our Navy."

The future USS Freedom (LCS 1) acknowledges the enduring foundation of the nation and honors American communities from coast to coast which bear the name Freedom. States having towns named Freedom range from New York to California, and include Indiana, Maine, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

"It strikes me that since freedom is what we are all about as a nation, this is a perfect name for LCS 1," said Clark.

Serving as ship’s sponsor is Birgit Smith, the widow of Army Sgt. 1st Class Paul Ray Smith, who died in Operation Iraqi Freedom and was posthumously awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor. Smith and the CNO authenticated the keel by having their initials welded to the hull by veteran welder Jim Renner.

Freedom, the first of two dramatically different LCS seaframes being produced, will be optimized for littoral or coastal missions, focusing on high-speed maneuverability, agility and sprint speed. Designed to operate quickly in a shallow-water environment, the LCS is capable of speeds up to 45 knots and can operate in water less than 20 feet deep.

The LCS class will act as a platform for launch and recovery of manned and unmanned vehicles. Its modular design will support interchangeable mission packages, allowing the ship to be reconfigured for antisubmarine warfare, mine warfare or surface warfare missions on an as-needed basis. LCS will be able to swap out mission packages pierside in a matter of hours, adapting as the tactical situation demands. These ships will also feature advanced networking capability to share tactical information with other Navy aircraft, ships, submarines, and joint units.

"This idea - this ship - revolutionizes the capability of our nation and our Navy," said Clark.

In May 2004, the Department of the Navy awarded both Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics - Bath Iron Works, Bath, Maine, separate contract options for final system design with options for detail design and construction of up to two LCS ships. In December, the Navy awarded Lockheed Martin Corp., Maritime Systems & Sensors, Moorestown, N.J., a contract for detail design and construction of the first LCS. Lockheed Martin's teammates include Gibbs & Cox, Arlington, Va.; Marinette Marine, Marinette, Wis.; and Bollinger Shipyards, Lockport, La.

Production at Marinette is expected to culminate in late 2006 when the ship is scheduled to be delivered to the Navy.

For more information on the Littoral Combat Ship, visit the LCS Web site at http://peoships.crane.navy.mil/lcs/

For related news, visit the Naval Sea Systems Command Navy NewsStand page at www.news.navy.mil/local/navsea/.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: keel; lcs; littorial; navy; ship
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Lockheed version. The Winner!
1 posted on 06/03/2005 4:27:18 PM PDT by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl; Radix; HiJinx; Spiff; Da Jerdge; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; TEXOKIE; Alamo-Girl; ..

Keel Laying.


2 posted on 06/03/2005 4:27:42 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Awesome looking ship!


3 posted on 06/03/2005 4:28:15 PM PDT by Paul_Denton (Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

bump


4 posted on 06/03/2005 4:31:43 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Might come in handy on the Rio Grande.


5 posted on 06/03/2005 4:32:31 PM PDT by martin_fierro (Shirtless at the 7-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Only if it's got high-flotation tires or tracks.


6 posted on 06/03/2005 4:34:55 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

No, not yet.
They are building 2 of each, this year it's Lockheed, next year it's GD, then Lockheed, then GD. I have to admit IMNSHO the GD design has it all over the Lockheed system. Better top speed and endurance, as well as much wider beam due to the trimaran design. This gives it much more internal volume. Also a planing hull in bad seas is a rough ride. Been there and felt it.
But this is a good step forward. This project has really been fast tracked.


7 posted on 06/03/2005 4:35:01 PM PDT by ProudVet77 (Warning: Occasional intelligent posts hidden by sarcasm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: SandRat

May the USS FREEDOM sail into Harms Way and make us proud of HER and ALL HER SAILORS!


9 posted on 06/03/2005 4:35:21 PM PDT by JOE43270 (JOE43270 America voted and said we are One Nation Under God with Liberty and Justice for All.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: everyone

Way cool.


10 posted on 06/03/2005 4:35:41 PM PDT by California Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
45 knots!!!!!

They must have consulted with the Nascar engine builders.

No restrictor plate here.

LVM

11 posted on 06/03/2005 4:37:32 PM PDT by LasVegasMac ("God. Guts. Guns. I don't call 911." (bumper sticker))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

This would make a most excellent Coast Guard Cutter, too.


12 posted on 06/03/2005 4:42:29 PM PDT by Ramius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

I am not a Navy kind of guy. But with all the angles on the artist's rendition, is it possible that this ship has built-in stealth capabilities.

Please tell me if I am barking up the wrong tree.


13 posted on 06/03/2005 4:45:24 PM PDT by txnativegop (Native Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

This a very spooky looking ship.


14 posted on 06/03/2005 4:46:12 PM PDT by dts32041 (Robin Hood, stealing from the government and giving back to tax payer. Where is he today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txnativegop

That's a pretty good analysis.


15 posted on 06/03/2005 4:47:43 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

No portholes. How are you supposed to view the scenery?


16 posted on 06/03/2005 4:48:42 PM PDT by AlaskaErik (Everyone should have a subject they are ignorant about. I choose corporate sports.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton
Awesome looking ship!

They're going to have all sorts of problems with those big holes in the side of the ship!

I realize that they're looking for light weight to make the ship more manuverable and able to sprint quickly, as well as having a shallow draft, but still, just a little armor might be a good idea!

Mark

17 posted on 06/03/2005 4:49:07 PM PDT by MarkL (I've got a fever, and the only prescription is MORE COWBELL!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LasVegasMac; Ramius

LOL - restrictor plates !!!
The GD does 50+kts. It's illegal on pit road.
Ramius - The USCG is very interested. They need new deepwater interdiction ships, and at $200million these are cheap.


18 posted on 06/03/2005 4:49:15 PM PDT by ProudVet77 (Warning: Occasional intelligent posts hidden by sarcasm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ProudVet77
The GD design sure looks cooler. Dounbt if that means much.
19 posted on 06/03/2005 4:53:12 PM PDT by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Cool, congratulations to Lockheed Martin. It was my favorite design among the three.


20 posted on 06/03/2005 4:53:58 PM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson