I don't know what is going on between you and Tulane, but I'd like a link to the person who 'refuted' what i said. For some reason I do not think his post will be completely pertinent. Plus i was wondering what your response was to my last post (129).
And by the way, just so you know, I am not trying to start silly flames and stuff (I used to enjoy such stuff once upon a time, but I outgrew it once certain Freeper friends started dropping Opus threads). But all the same I am curious why my post is 'just stupid and deserves to be called as much.' There are certain points in your posts I could very well have attacked but did not see any positive point for doing so. But I am curious as to what 'stupid' points I was making. Quite so. Amazingly so. And maybe once you tell me which ones i was making I may very well elucidate yours.
I was referring to Tulane's assertion, not your post.
"I don't know what is going on between you and Tulane, but I'd like a link to the person who 'refuted' what i said. For some reason I do not think his post will be completely pertinent. Plus i was wondering what your response was to my last post (129)."
I, a her, made several posts and picking out a link to one, which no doubt will be selective and out of context doesn't mean your arguments were not refuted.
Geez Spetz, I apologize. I was breezing through posts so fast, and was a tad angry at being accused of something I was not guilty of (by another poster)--I went after you, making the assumption you were a part of the lynch mob.
I sincerely apologize for my mistake! I'll kick my own butt for yah.