Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tulane
Wow...your attacking a person's religion.

I would conclude he is a Christian. I have not attacked Christianity. All I have done is demonstrate that he is a hypocrite of the first order.
131 posted on 06/03/2005 12:55:58 PM PDT by pyx (Rule #1. The LEFT lies. Rule #2. See Rule #1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: pyx

"I would conclude he is a Christian. I have not attacked Christianity. All I have done is demonstrate that he is a hypocrite of the first order."

Bulldung. Include the context with the character attack. Show the others here that it was meant to illustrate the ridiculousness of asserting AIDS is not now a heterosexual disease too.

Let me paraphrase, for the third time, what I said:

I said if heterosexuals don't have to worry about HIV, then have unprotected sex with a hooker, or set your daughter up with an HIV positive man. Clearly a proper response would be "no way," because you and the formerlib know that HIV is a threat to heterosexuals. Obviously, I was not WISHING Hiv on anyone.


165 posted on 06/03/2005 2:49:39 PM PDT by followerofchrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson