Replies

Why don't you test the theory yourself. If you are a woman, have unprotected sex with an HIV positive man. If you are a man, just have unprotected sex with an HIV positive hooker, or better yet, set your daughter up with an HIV positive man.

Would a REAL follower of Christ recommend and advocate a completely morally bankrupt and potentially fatal experiment for someone else and more especially, someone else's innocent daughter -- somone who isn't even a part of this discussion ?

After all, YOU were the one who mentioned shunning morally bankrupt behaviour when you said,

I had a debate with a liberal once online about this disease. I argued that homosexuality should be shunned instead of encouraged.

in Post #52.

It must be tough for someone like you, to live in a house that couldn't possibly have any mirrors.

"Would a REAL follower of Christ recommend and advocate a completely morally bankrupt and potentially fatal experiment for someone else and more especially, someone else's innocent daughter -- somone who isn't even a part of this discussion ?"

I was making a point about how dangerous it is to think AIDS only affects gays and iv drug users. You know that from the context of the comment you responded to. The context was "if AIDS can't be spread by heterosexual contact, then set your daughter up with an HIV positive man." You don't seriously think I would want the poster or his daughter to get AIDS, do you? If anything, I want my comments to provoke thought, and to refute the idea that heterosexual non-married people shouldn't use condoms because it's a "gay" disease. It's about SAVING lives, and you know it. Why try to turn it around, when those who deny heterosexuals can be greatly affected as a population are part of the problem?

"After all, YOU were the one who mentioned shunning morally bankrupt behaviour when you said,

I had a debate with a liberal once online about this disease. I argued that homosexuality should be shunned instead of encouraged."

I have always maintained that promiscuous behavior and iv drug use are the major causes of aids. There's nothing inconsistent about what I said. The liberal was denying to me that homosexuality was a major reason for the spread (at least in the west). Now here, a few deny that women are at great risk. That's bull.

"It must be tough for someone like you, to live in a house that couldn't possibly have any mirrors."

Your post can be summed up as follows: You agree with the irresponsible Frontpagemag article, so you attack me personally because I disagree with the dangerous nonsense.
LIVES ARE AT STAKE. In some areas of Africa, the infection rate of babies is as high as 40%. This isn't a left or right issue. It's a human issue.

And by the way I do not live in a glass house. In my 20's, I had several sexual partners. In the last 7 years I have had one. Not only because I was saved, but because I fear STD's.