You don't read very well. It's labeling research that shows unprotected heterosexual intercourse as a "Radical Big Lie" that we have a problem with. I am sure that this is because the poster has an agenda that has nothing to do with medical science (that's you, in case you didn't understand).
Again, the article does not state what you allege it states only that unsterile punctures and anal sex represent a much greater risk than vaginal intercourse.
Equating them as risk factors is the big lie in this reference.
Really? At least I don't make things up as I go. But don't let that stop you from claiming the article says things that it clearly does not.
"People skilled at public relations developed the "Big Lie": that HIV was a major risk to all"