Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYC-bound Virgin Air Flight 45 squawking Hijack code; being diverted to New Brunswick, Canada
ABC News | 6-3-5 | ABC News

Posted on 06/03/2005 7:25:05 AM PDT by Petronski

The pilot says the hijack code is an error and the plane is secure, but naturally the authorities are not trusting him.


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 361-365 next last
To: Nathan Zachary
I'm sorry to dissapoint you, but a lot of the F18's f15's etc. parts are made in various places in Canada. The Canadian CF18 hornet is built to Canadian Airforce requirements, they have features not found on USAF models.

Sorry to disappoint you but the USAF doesn't operate the F/A-18.

CF-188

301 posted on 06/03/2005 9:59:22 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
LOL, shit does happen even to the best of pilots.

Because of this problem, I was taught to always select a one as the last digit, prior to switching my transponder code.

Oh well, this demonstrated that some people actually pay attention to the transponder codes which are displayed on the radar screens.

This ATC should be given a cash award for a job well done.

302 posted on 06/03/2005 9:59:35 AM PDT by Hunble (U.S. Army for 20 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
Incorrect. Air Force F-4Gs started out as Navy F-4Es. The Navy also flew a small number of F-4Gs. The Luftwaffe flew F-4Fs and RF-4Es. The variant designator is not country specific.

I thought that I might have erred. Thanks for the correction. I think this system (F-15I for Israel...F-15K for Korea) holds, but it is more recent than the Phantom days. No?

303 posted on 06/03/2005 10:10:02 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

The Canadian F/A-18 is essentially identical to the US Navy version.


304 posted on 06/03/2005 10:11:42 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

If the passengers were taken off the plane and then reboarded, it would be interesting to count heads and see if anyone's not making the final leg of the trip.


305 posted on 06/03/2005 10:11:48 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moose4
This is not a uniquely Canadian paint job. Some US planes have decoy canopies painted on the bottom too. The concept is that an enemy will be momentarily confused- the attitude of the decoyed fighter will not be immediately apparent, and that makes it hard to predict which way it's going to go.

As for the Dash-8 and Dash-80, I have droned many miles in these boxy wingovers, they do what they are supposed to do (which is a good thing for an aircraft).
306 posted on 06/03/2005 10:13:50 AM PDT by Ender Wiggin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: Hunble

I doubt that pilot is going to have a job with Virgin (VS) anymore… Just the cost of rerouting will be expensive itself…. And add to that the US apparently refused VS entry into US airspace… Pretty serious stuff even if it was accidental…


307 posted on 06/03/2005 10:13:51 AM PDT by Xbvalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: Xbvalk

Yup!

The pilot is toast. However, the ATC who was paying attention to his radar scope, should be rewarded for a job well done.


308 posted on 06/03/2005 10:16:26 AM PDT by Hunble (U.S. Army for 20 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

I have a quick question ... why are these planes diverted to Canada? Not being dense, I've just never understood that. (And I'm an Air Force vet, non-flyer).

Thanks ...


309 posted on 06/03/2005 10:17:43 AM PDT by Jackson57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jackson57

I would hazzard a guess and say they divert them there because it isn't a high population area.


310 posted on 06/03/2005 10:21:05 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: Jackson57

As is the Norm When the 7500 went out, It was apparently picked up by the Canadians, and the US then Blocked Entry… Since the CF-F18’s intercepted the plane it is usually lands in Country’s first Port of Entry---Hence is Halifax, if it was entry US Airspace it would land in Bangor Main…


311 posted on 06/03/2005 10:24:33 AM PDT by Xbvalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
The engineers were even considering using it for a high altitude satalite launching plateform. It really is sad it was not developed. But we do know the same engineers took their idea's with them and went to work for NASA and such, so who knows just how much of their brainwork is in actual use today.

I'ver seen the specs for the Mark III Arrow and it would have been a heck of an aircraft. The US produced practically nothing to compare until the F14/Phoenix systems.

312 posted on 06/03/2005 10:25:23 AM PDT by Heatseeker ("I sort of like liberals now. They’re kind of cute when they’re shivering and afraid." - Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
For those that do not know the transponder codes, and how easy it is to select the wrong one:

7777 Military, Interceptor

7700 Emergency

7600 Lost communications

7500 Hijack

1200 Visual flight rules

Now, if your radar controller told you to switch to something like 1523, it is rather easy to hit 7500 during the switching process. The pilot can only switch one digit at time on most transponders.

313 posted on 06/03/2005 10:26:05 AM PDT by Hunble (U.S. Army for 20 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL; Petronski

Sorry. Didn't mean to create any heart attacks. :(


314 posted on 06/03/2005 10:27:07 AM PDT by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
The digits of the transponder only go up to 7. Therefore, 7777 would be the highest number the transponder can go.

Thanks for that information. It would be interesting to learn if the same number of passengers who started the flight complete it after the plane's Canadian sojourn.

315 posted on 06/03/2005 10:27:39 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: myprecious

There are probably moths stuck on them as well!


316 posted on 06/03/2005 10:28:27 AM PDT by angcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
TERR: "You arr h'ijak," waving pistol about cabin.
PILOT: "OK." (Sets XPONDR to "Hijack")
TOWER: "Virgin 45 Heavy; confirm "Hijack" code?"
TERR: "What heh min?" pointing pistol at Pilot
PILOT (prespiring like Barney Frank at a Bikers For America Run): "Uhhh... I've no idea." To tower; "No, a mistake, just trying to find Dr. Don Rose on the AM is all. Having a frightfully gay time here, how about you lot?"

I would not acknowledge a query sent in the clear about such a situation either; too much possibility that someone might become even more unhinged than already so.

317 posted on 06/03/2005 10:30:27 AM PDT by Utilizer (Some days you're the windshield. Some days you're the bug...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Utilizer
Yup, and that is why those codes were created.

Also, keeping your flaps extended after landing, is a secondary code.

As one of the local airport managers, I rather enjoy messing with student pilots who forget this signal. It is funny to watch, as we deploying our emergency hijack response.

318 posted on 06/03/2005 10:34:40 AM PDT by Hunble (U.S. Army for 20 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: Xbvalk

Ah ok, that makes sense. Thanks. So, they're not ALWAYS diverted to Halifax.

Sorry, made the mistake of reading the whining over in the DUmp and they were yammering about us sending our problems to Canada, etc.


319 posted on 06/03/2005 10:34:54 AM PDT by Jackson57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: mitchbert
You're thinking about Gander, Newfoundland, where the locals basically showed up at the airport with offers of food and lodging.

If you ever feel like you're losing your faith in humanity, read The Day The World Came To Town: 9/11 in Gander, Newfoundland

There's a touching section about the CEO of Hugo Boss (stuck in Gander) refusing to take gourmet food brought to him by a Hugo Boss associate because he felt that doing so would be an insult to the people of Gander who had been so kind to him and his fellow passengers.

320 posted on 06/03/2005 10:41:48 AM PDT by Modernman ("Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made." -Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 361-365 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson