Posted on 06/03/2005 5:44:32 AM PDT by OESY
It seems only civilized that every expiring political secret should get a decent burial....
...So why did many Deep Throat researchers -- especially insiders -- reject the idea of Mr. Felt? Because much information that Deep Throat provided was a matter less of specific facts about the Watergate investigation than about the nature of the Nixon White House. Deep Throat talked about the clockwork craziness the White House had become, about the sound of Nixon angry and the character of individuals involved in the cover-up. These insights were presented with the certainty of personal experience. But they were not within the first-hand knowledge of an FBI official, even a senior one.
It may yet turn out that there were composite elements in Deep Throat and that some of these insights came from sources other than Mr. Felt. Or it may be that Mr. Felt presented to Mr. Woodward as authoritative information some things that were first-hand observations, some that were reliable second-hand gleanings, and some that were more or less informed surmises.
It may not have mattered. While Deep Throat was talking, Watergate burglar James McCord was mitigating his probable sentence by spilling the beans to the federal grand jury under the direction of Judge John Sirica. In this drama, which led directly to the exposure of the Watergate cover-up, Deep Throat was a marginal player.
If Deep Throat was not critical to the unraveling of Watergate, then what was his importance? Perhaps it was to foster in American politics the idea that the central feature of our government is the secret knowledge held by those at the center of power, and that only through the bravery of whistleblowers like Deep Throat can the polity gain the keys to the secrets and the ability to reassert democratic control.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
Today's bloggers are the MSM's whistleblowers who introduce a badly needed external review of shoddy journalistic practices. One such abuse highlighted by the "Deep Throat" affair is the indiscriminate use of unnamed sources who can say anything a reporter like Woodward wants him/her to say.
What Everybody's Missing About Deep Throat (He Would Have Buried Watergate)
More and more of these idiots are calling him a "whistleblower". He was not. He was violating the trust of his position, in other words, breaking the law by revealing factoids about an on-going investigation.
It was important to the establishment of the MSM as the real power in Washington.
I am OK with that nomenclature. It only highlights the bias in the MSM. Remember Linda Tripp?! She was a 'whistleblower' spilling the beans on a White House coverup, but was never treated as such by the MSM.
People keep saying how brave this guy was. He may have been right and just, proper and helpful toward salvation. He wasn't brave, at least as far as this story is concerned. He reported in secret and operated from the shadows.
I'm not sure what you do when the top cop is a crook. He may have felt he had no other viable path than to get it all in the public eye.
Nevertheless, when you can go to the local saloon and pound down a few with the object of your reporting, knowing full well he hasn't a clue you are the guy opening the trap door, well, this is NOT and act of bravery.
"Following sentence, I would appreciate the opportunity to talk with you privately in chambers. Since I cannot feel confident in talking with an FBI agent, in testifying before a Grand Jury whose U.S. Attorneys work for the Department of Justice, or in talking with other government representatives, such a discussion with you would be of assistance to me." (Highlighting is mine)
"Nixon finishes his term.
Finishes much of his agenda.
Ford, probably two terms, in spite of himself.
We would never have had to up with Jimmah Cahtah.
And probably no Clinton (southern governor, etc.).
Only two dem presidents in 40 years...Carter and Toon.
And if Nixon had given Felt the job, we wouldn't have had to put up with them.
The lingering "triumph" of the Left bringing down Nixon never would have saturated the culture.
And liberalism would be far, far paler than it is today.
James McCord of the Watergate burglars and CREEP (Committee for the Reelection of the President) testified before the Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities on May 18, 1973 and was asked by Senator Daniel Inouye (D-HI) why the break-in was conducted. McCord replied, "Democratic national headquarters staff members" were "working closely with violence groups"… "which involved violence and demonstrations against our committee". When Senators Inouye, Lowell Weicker (R-CT), Ed Gurney (R-FL), and Howard Baker (R-TN) asked for more detail, in each case McCord repeated the "violence" reference but specifically – and only -- named the "Vietnam Veterans Against the War", accusing them as "a violence-oriented group" (Hearing pages 180, 200, 201, 223-24 and elsewhere, May 18 and 22 testimony).
Gee, Vietnam Veterans Against the War. Smells like Kerry.
Deep Throat talked about the clockwork craziness the White House had become, about the sound of Nixon angry and the character of individuals involved in the cover-up. These insights were presented with the certainty of personal experience. But they were not within the first-hand knowledge of an FBI official, even a senior one.
One person's "whistleblower" is another person's "snitch." "Snitch" is how the Clinton team portrayed Tripp, and the MSM picked up the ball and ran with it. And the MSM looked the other way - even cooperated - when the Clintonistas tried to dig up dirt on the personal lives of Starr's legal team. That was as bad or worse than anything Nixon did, and the press was complicit in it.
The Clinton coverup needs to be compared to Watergate at every turn. We must never let the nation forget the complicity of the MSM in this!
Kerry: "Yes."
He provided convenient cover for W&B to make up some of their story and to have other leakers provide info without fear of discovery.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1415502/posts
What Everybody's Missing About Deep Throat (He Would Have Buried Watergate)
Self | June 2, 2005 | JohnRobertson
Posted on 06/02/2005 8:21:22 PM PDT by John Robertson
While many MSM'ers (sorry, most) are lionizing this guy as "a hero," someone who "did what he had to do," something big is being missed.
Our side has pointed out that he authorized/engineered illegal breakins himself...
And that he turned on the Whitehouse because he didn't get the top FBI job. Now think about that....
Felt became a snitch because he didn't get something he wanted! He was an opportunist, plain and simple (and it runs in the family, apparently, as they shamelessly say they urged the old man to do it so they could all get some money). Yeah, a real hero.
But here's what I haven't seen....
If they had made him the head of the FBI, he WOULD NOT have turned on the Whitehouse.
In fact, as head of the FBI....
HE WOULD HAVE HELPED THEM BURY WATERGATE!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1415502/posts
"Remember when Kerry said he wasn't a member when VVAW voted on whether or not to assassinate a few members of Congress who supported the Vietnam War?, Problem is, Kerry was a member at that time and at the time of Watergate, Kerry was running for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives."
What US Senator from a famous family went to Nam to start the programming of Kerry in Nam and continued to program him to hate America after Kerry returned from Nam?
> The Clinton coverup needs to be compared to Watergate at every turn.
Not only that, but clinton needs to be compared to President Nixon in the same way. And Nixon will have been found to be the better man.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.