Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Mother's Act of Love to Save Her Unborn Child
LifeNews.com ^ | 6/2/05 | Justin Torres

Posted on 06/02/2005 6:07:36 PM PDT by Former Fetus

A Mother's Act of Love to Save Her Unborn Child

by Justin Torres
June 1, 2005

LifeNews.com Note: Justin Torres is a research fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University and research director of the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.

There's a truism in conservative politics that abortion is everything. Clinton's impeachment was a proxy fight over abortion (the feminists were trying to save the bacon of the most reliably pro-abortion administration in history, thus demonstrating that they cared more for the ghastly procedure than the oppressed sisterhood). Certainly, the fight over the "nuclear option" was all about abortion and the Supreme Court.

Even some members of the left have begun to question the Democratic party's rigid adherence to the turgid politics of Roe v. Wade, and the way that adherence has distorted Democratic positions on everything from schools to labor to international aid. (For an example, see Benjamin Wittes's penetrating "Letting go of Roe," in the February 2005 Atlantic Monthly.)

An evil like abortion, though, is apt to distort more than simply our politics. My family has been given a tragic lesson in this truth recently.

As some readers may know, on May 6, my sister-in-law Susan Torres - 26 years old, a mother of a 2-year-old boy, and 17 weeks pregnant - suffered a stroke brought on by undiagnosed melanoma. At this time, she lies brain dead in a Northern Virginia hospital, with no hope of ever recovering, her breathing sustained by machine.

In this midst of this tragedy and the grief that lingers like a context, like a fog, over every conversation and meal and moment in the hospital, we have hope. Doctors believe that they may be able to save this baby, keeping Susan alive long enough to deliver the child prematurely. It is no more than a fighting chance, far less than a certainty, that the baby will live. But we have hope. Keeping this baby alive is Susan's last act of love, one that has been tremendously moving to watch even as it makes you question everything you thought you knew about the fundamental justice of the world.

But this is where abortion, and the utilitarian mindset that it engenders concerning the sanctity of human life, steals its way into this tragedy. I think of it as "the moment," the little whisper of hesitation, shared not just by the doctors but even by my family. It's the moment in which you think, is this right? Are we doing the right thing? Wouldn't it just be better to let go, start over, find closure?

Once the soothing cliche's start, it is difficult to make them stop. You have to force yourself to remember: this is a child's life. And children are always a good thing, devoutly to be wished for and fiercely to be fought for.

For my family, the moment was no more than a hiccup. Still, it is clear that for some of the doctors involved in this case, the decisions my brother and Susan's parents have made are foolish. That is the effect of abortion: that it has in various, subtle ways sapped the intrinsic human impulse to fight for the good of children.

I don't wish to be too harsh, and I certainly do not wish to suggest that these doctors - many of whom have taken enormous and personal interest in Susan's case - are in any way agents of the culture of death. These doctors are trained to assess chances and deploy resources where they are most effective. I respect that. We are here to fight; it's their job to tell us the truth and give us their realistic assessment. And many of them are fighting alongside us, to my immense gratitude.

But I wonder. Fifty years ago, medicine could not have done what we are trying to do. But I suspect that if it could have been done, no one then would have hesitated. The answer would have been, Of course, we must try to save the child, because saving children is what medicine is meant to do.

Thirty years after Roe, we have not yet fully come to understand all the ways that abortion has distorted our culture, coarsened it, made it less loving and less noble. The moment of hesitation I describe is the culture of death whispering insinuations at us. It is important that we continue to shout truth from the rooftops to drown out its voice.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: abortion; braindeath; cultureofdeath; cultureoflife; prolife; unbornbaby

1 posted on 06/02/2005 6:07:37 PM PDT by Former Fetus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

bump for VA law.


2 posted on 06/02/2005 6:43:45 PM PDT by japaneseghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Future Useless Eater; cpforlife.org

bump


3 posted on 06/02/2005 7:54:22 PM PDT by candeee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; ...
Pro-Life PING

Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.

4 posted on 06/03/2005 8:27:49 PM PDT by cpforlife.org (Abortion is the Choice of Satan, the father of lies and a MURDERER from the beginning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WFTR

Would you like to comment upon the 'lack of God curing this woman thus the child ought be allowed to die naturally'?... You see, William, there is every possibility that the medical advancements now giving this little one a chance to be born ARE POSSIBLE BECAUSE OF THE GRACE OF GOD in the applied knowledge of medical professionals.


5 posted on 06/03/2005 8:48:54 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org

My unborn son became a born son today, at 10 lbs. 4 ozs.


6 posted on 06/03/2005 9:52:26 PM PDT by Lexinom (No more war! (against the unborn.) http://www.abort73.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lexinom

Thanks be to God! The Lord bless your wife and this little one whom He has blessed you with.


7 posted on 06/03/2005 9:59:33 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus
I certainly do not wish to suggest that these doctors - many of whom have taken enormous and personal interest in Susan's case - are in any way agents of the culture of death.

If the shoe fits.

8 posted on 06/04/2005 4:03:46 AM PDT by Saundra Duffy (Terri Schindler was murdered - IMPEACH JUDGE GREER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lexinom

Thank you, sincerely. It's been a trying 2 days, with most of our time at the hospital as the wife recovers from the c-section. Mother and baby are doing well, and the little one is learning to breast feed.


9 posted on 06/04/2005 7:08:16 PM PDT by Lexinom (No more war! (against the unborn.) http://www.abort73.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Personally, I applaud the choice that the family is making. In these situations, I see two patients. One is the mother and the other is the child. In cases where the welfare of one may be in conflict with the welfare of the other, then I am thankful that I'm not facing that situation and don't presume to tell the family what to do. The legal system has no place and should have no place in those cases. In this case, I don't see any downside to keeping the mother alive long enough to deliver the child. However, if the family decided that they didn't want the mother's life support continued, I wouldn't invoke the legal system to force them to my view.

What's also clear is that you are angry with me because I don't support letting you impose your will in some situations. You claim that the Grace of God has allowed medical science to develop technologies that can save lives, but you set yourself up as the arbiter of how and when those technologies should be employed. You see yourself as the one who should control benefits that have resulted from God's Grace and the hard work of those in the medical field. I challenged that position on another thread, so now you maliciously assume that I would have a problem with a family acting to save the unborn child in the womb of a mother who has likely passed.

Enough is enough. If all you have to offer is insults, I see no reason to try to have rational discussions. I've tried to stick to the substance of the issues. If that is beyond you, I'll look elsewhere for intelligent conversation.

Bill

10 posted on 06/05/2005 9:16:42 PM PDT by WFTR (Liberty isn't for cowards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

ping to 9. Thanks be to God, indeed. Ps. 127.


11 posted on 06/06/2005 12:58:21 AM PDT by Lexinom (No more war! (against the unborn.) http://www.abort73.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WFTR
Is this what you tout as 'intelligent conversation'? ... On a Terri Schiavo thread, arguing that a feeding tube is somehow not acceptable to aid a human being because it is artificial means for life support: "The disabled person is starving because his health has failed and God hasn't acted to save him." WFTR
12 posted on 06/06/2005 7:55:51 AM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama; A2J; Agitate; Alouette; Annie03; aposiopetic; attagirl; axel f; Balto_Boy; ...

ProLife Ping!

If anyone wants on or off my ProLife Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.

13 posted on 06/06/2005 8:33:59 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback ("Eureka! I just found the gene that causes people to believe in genetic determinism!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus
Thirty years after Roe, we have not yet fully come to understand all the ways that abortion has distorted our culture,

In so many ways.
14 posted on 06/06/2005 8:38:05 AM PDT by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lexinom
My unborn son became a born son today, at 10 lbs. 4 ozs.

How wonderful, that brought joy in my heart.

How tall was he?
15 posted on 06/06/2005 8:40:25 AM PDT by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Delphinium

Hello Delphinium! Nice to hear from you. Hope you are well.

He is 21.5"


16 posted on 06/06/2005 12:06:57 PM PDT by Lexinom (No more war! (against the unborn.) http://www.abort73.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lexinom

My 10 pound boy was almost 24 inchesa long. He is now 6'4" and weighs 250lbs.


17 posted on 06/06/2005 10:36:30 PM PDT by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lexinom
Mother and baby are doing well, and the little one is learning to breast feed.

Heheh. You got a BIG one, a jumbo, an extra large. :-)

Congratulations! Hope you didn't buy too many newborn sized diapers.

18 posted on 06/06/2005 10:40:27 PM PDT by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson