Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Why don't we have a United States Space Force????
1 posted on 06/02/2005 5:26:00 PM PDT by KevinDavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; jimkress; discostu; ...

2 posted on 06/02/2005 5:26:34 PM PDT by KevinDavis (the space/future belongs to the eagles, the earth/past to the groundhogs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis

Because the Air Force doesn't want to give up its space assets to create an independent Space Force, much as the Army didn't want to give up its air assets to create an independent Air Force.


3 posted on 06/02/2005 5:27:47 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis

4 posted on 06/02/2005 5:28:22 PM PDT by G32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis
Why don't we have a United States Space Force????

Because the United States couldn't scare up enough Space Cadets.

5 posted on 06/02/2005 5:29:27 PM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis

Number One-Space-Force-Team-USA-- ACTIVATE!!!!


6 posted on 06/02/2005 5:30:12 PM PDT by agooga (et tu, McCain?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis

I'd prefer to call it the U.S. Starfleet.


7 posted on 06/02/2005 5:30:18 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis

Lots of "space happy sauce" making the rounds today. ;^)


8 posted on 06/02/2005 5:31:40 PM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis

No, no. It should just be the US Navy moving into space. It fits better. Big ships, watches, a bridge, CIC.


9 posted on 06/02/2005 5:32:39 PM PDT by Mr. Peabody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis

Inter-force feuding prevents the creation of the United States Space Force.

It has been discussed time and time again, but nobody wants to give anyone else any leeway.

Its quite silly, actually.


10 posted on 06/02/2005 5:35:32 PM PDT by Crazieman (If Con is the opposite of Pro, what is the opposite of Progress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis

Russia's economy is only slightly larger than Los Angeles County according to this article:

http://claremont.org/writings/crb/spring2005/tartakovsky.html

We will not need a "space force" until we have a permanent, self-sustaining civilian presence in space whose security is somehow threatened.

Weaponizing orbital platforms, however, well, that's just a given.


11 posted on 06/02/2005 5:36:03 PM PDT by Asclepius (protectionists would outsource our dignity and prosperity in return for illusory job security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis
I want to confirm the priority and strategic nature of these actions," the minister said

"but," he added, "the State won't even pay for our wodka, so it looks like attitude and words will have to tide us over."

16 posted on 06/02/2005 5:47:43 PM PDT by RightWhale (It comes down to lack of private property rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis
We don't have a space force because we have a welfare system instead. Our priorities are ,as usual, way out of wack. Remember he who controls outer space.....
29 posted on 06/02/2005 6:06:34 PM PDT by rodguy911 (Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis


30 posted on 06/02/2005 6:10:08 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis
We do have a US Space Command. It is part of the Air Force. Click here for more info.

From the website (GlobalSecurity.org):

U.S. Space Command was created in 1985, but America’s military actually began operating in space much earlier. With the Soviet Union’s unexpected 1957 launch of the world’s first man-made satellite, Sputnik I, President Eisenhower accelerated the nation’s slowly emerging civil and military space efforts. The vital advantage that space could give either country during those dark days of the Cold War was evident in his somber words. "Space objectives relating to defense are those to which the highest priority attaches because they bear on our immediate safety," he said.

During the 1960s and 1970s, the Army, Navy and Air Force advanced and expanded space technologies in the areas of communication, meteorology, geodesy, navigation and reconnaissance. Space continued to support strategic deterrence by providing arms control and treaty verification, and by offering unambiguous, early warning of any missile attack on North America.

On September 23, 1985, the Joint Chiefs of Staff confirmed the ever-increasing value of military space systems by creating a new unified command — U.S. Space Command — to help institutionalize the use of space in U.S. deterrence efforts.

Here's their patch:

Here's Space Command's website: United States Air Force Space Command HQ

Cool stuff.

32 posted on 06/02/2005 7:28:34 PM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis
Why don't we have a United States Space Force????

We have the Space Patrol!


34 posted on 06/03/2005 7:58:27 AM PDT by Dominick ("Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought." - JP II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis
Why don't we have a United States Space Force????

If anything, we need fewer services.

38 posted on 06/03/2005 5:49:48 PM PDT by Half Vast Conspiracy (If their Chief of police is okay with it, I am guessing that we should probably be okay with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson