Clinton. It figures. He and his legacy is like a turd that won't flush.
I would ask Mr. Buono EXACTLY WHERE in the Constitution does it mention his inalienable right to not be offended?
It offends me that he thinks that his seething hatred of Christianity could be enough to have an 80 year old memorial torn down.
Apt description.
He and his legacy is like a turd that won't flush.
Telling turdy jokes now, are we?
"like a turd that won't flush" is probably the best single description of the Clinton legacy anyone has ever come up with. Congrats!
But I don;t think the germane issue is the "right not to be offended", Constitutionally guaranteed or not.
I'm not a lawyer, but this seems a classic case of eminent domain. The government has always given itself the right that supercedes all other's rights, to move in on even private property and take it over for its own (usually unconvincingly expressed) purposes. Eminent domain is not a two way street---no private citizen can say "I was here first, so I have eminent domain". Ordinarily (at least on paper) expropriation of this sort can involve compensation by the government to whoever's land they are expropriating.
What makes this story even MORE sickening is that the ACLU has extracted for ITSELF "compensation" (in the form of legal fees) from the very person it is trying to vanquish.
They are relentless and VERY SOON , I feel , they are going to go ONE STEP too far, and are going to drop that ONE STRAW, and a broken-backed camel is going to crush them underfoot. I feel it coming.