Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Blog Blows Open Canadian Corruption Scandal - (Ed Morrissey,Captn's Qtrs had inside source!)
A.I.M.ORG ^ | MAY 31, 2005 | SHERRIE GOSSETT

Posted on 05/31/2005 8:13:59 PM PDT by CHARLITE

In one of the most dramatic stories to date of blogger influence, an American blogger listed the details of inflammatory testimony in a Canadian government corruption case-testimony that was under a publication ban enacted by the judge.

Soon the blogger's website was inundated with hundreds of thousands of hits from Canadians hungry for information, but shut out of the story by the ban. It was a unique case of a lone blogger disseminating information the media were unable to publish.

Ed Morrissey, the writer of Captain's Quarters blog, started reporting on the testimony on April 2 in an entry titled "Canada's Corruption Scandal Breaks Wide Open." The political scandal involved allegations of bribery, kickbacks and illegal campaign financing to the tune of tens of millions of dollars which found their way into liberal party coffers.

Canada's Prime Minister Paul Martin appointed the Gomery Commission to investigate the charges and determine whether to bring charges against government officials. (Morrissey recommended the blog Small Dead Animals for "excellent background" on the case.)

Most of the testimony in the case had been public, but Judge Gomery instituted a publication ban on the testimony of three key witnesses. Blogger Morrissey managed to get a contact at the trial, which was later reported to be a Canadian journalist.

Wrote Morrissey: "The potential damage of their testimony has so unnerved the Liberal Party that they have reportedly started working towards a snap election so that they will not have to face the voters once the facts surface from the record."

(Excerpt) Read more at aim.org ...


TOPICS: Canada; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: adscam; aim; canada; captainsquarters; edmorrissey; newmedia; pajamahadeen; weblogs

1 posted on 05/31/2005 8:13:59 PM PDT by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
"..details of inflammatory testimony in a Canadian government corruption case-testimony that was under a publication ban enacted by the judge..."

Says it all.

2 posted on 05/31/2005 8:20:19 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
"Canada's Corruption Scandal Breaks Wide Open." The political scandal involved allegations of bribery, kickbacks and illegal campaign financing to the tune of tens of millions of dollars which found their way into liberal party coffers.

Did they claim there was no controlling legal authority? It worked for Al gore.

3 posted on 05/31/2005 8:27:00 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Vote Republican - Vote morally correct!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
He added. "If the Gomery Commission can corroborate Brault, [one of the witnesses whose testimony was under the ban] then the reek of corruption goes through all levels of the Liberal party and may explain their ability to out-campaign the Conservatives. After all, they've siphoned off hundreds of millions of government dollars to promote their own party and to guarantee their monopoly on power. They hijacked the Canadian tax base to fund their own campaigns and hide the financial trail."

Not altogether different from the American left with the media; by now it's obvious for all to CBSNCBCNN.

4 posted on 05/31/2005 8:32:17 PM PDT by perfect stranger (I need new glasses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Argh

Did you hear about the case from this source?

... or from FR sources?


5 posted on 05/31/2005 8:35:50 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (-I can only contribute to FR monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS contributes to her campaign every day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE; All
ADSCAM: Click the picture-


6 posted on 06/01/2005 2:35:42 AM PDT by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

The case was known about, publicised by the media up here. This blog published the parts of the testimony which were under the ban. I found out about what he published by reading about it somewhere on the Internet, I don't remember if it was FR or some Canadian sources.


7 posted on 06/01/2005 3:11:56 AM PDT by Argh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

BUMP


8 posted on 08/04/2005 11:54:14 AM PDT by kitkat ("We're not going to let anybody frighten us from our great love of freedom." GWB, 7/22/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson