[PatrickHenry]

The problem with evolution is that it is a very broad theory based on - as another poster originally put it..imagination. THere is no proof of it because proof is science is the ability to reproduce a result. We cannot do that, nor have we seen that to happen in nature during the recorded history of man.

The scientific method. Definitions of "theory," "hypothesis," etc.
The scientific method. Another site. Exhaustive discussion.
What's a Scientific Theory? Encyclopedia article.
The Theory of Evolution. Excellent introductory encyclopedia article.
Is Evolution Science? It certainly is. Here's why.
Evolution and the Nature of Science. Excellent discussion.

Another service of
Darwin Central
The conspiracy that cares

[blueblazes]

None of that answers my original arguments so the points stand. Instead of just posting links, post your own thoughts, as I post mine. Evolution is based on observation and assumption, not proof. The only "proof" in science is being able to reproduce a result or to predict a result. To the best of my knowledge neither of these has been true of evolution. Everything else is theory. Theory can be good or bad, but should not be held as a religion.