None of that answers my original arguments so the points stand. Instead of just posting links, post your own thoughts, as I post mine. Evolution is based on observation and assumption, not proof. The only "proof" in science is being able to reproduce a result or to predict a result. To the best of my knowledge neither of these has been true of evolution. Everything else is theory. Theory can be good or bad, but should not be held as a religion.
The reason I posted those links was so that you could improve your understanding of how science works. Nothing in science is "proved." Theories can be dis-proved, but never proved. Theories are supported by making predictions which observations then demonstrates are accurate. That's been the unbroken history of evolution. But if you want to cling to your personal -- and incorrect -- conception of science, that is your decision
Oh, for your further information -- should you care -- there are numerous sciences that rely on observation, not reproducing results in a lab. For example: astronomy, geology, anthropology, paleontology, climatology, archeology, and cosmology. And of course, evolution.
One further thought (and a few links), then I'll leave you to do as you like: Evolution makes numerous predictions, which always work out:
All present and fossilized animals found should conform to the standard evolutionary tree. And they do.
Fossilized intermediates should appear in the "correct" chronological order on the standard tree.
Many organisms should retain vestigial structures as structural remnants of lost functions.
Species that are more closely related should share a greater portion of their DNA.. Excerpt:
[A]n hypothesis of evolutionary relationships is provided by the fossil record, which indicates when particular types of organisms evolved. In addition, by examining the anatomical structures of fossils and of modern species, we can infer how closely species are related to each other. When degree of genetic similarity is compared with our ideas of evolutionary relationships based on fossils, a close match is evident.