This is Bad legislation! Your going after the wrong target. There is no tax payer funding of the ACLU.
Get after the Judges. Not the law that lets YOU recover expenses.
So where do governments get their money when they have to pay up? The taxpayer.
Get after the Judges. Not the law that lets YOU recover expenses.
I agree we also need to get after the judges. But why should we have to pay the ACLU lawyers' fee (via our taxes to cities, towns, etc.) just because someone is "offended"?
This isn't going to stop recovery from real damage, such as physical injury or property damage. It's only going to stop collection of fees in cases where someone is "offended."
Religion Fights A No Profit Situation
Indiana Rep. John Hostettler (R) is getting ready to face down Goliath using the very stone that has been hurled at the religious elements in government, schools, and other public entities that have been the recipient of recent lawsuit engagements by the ACLU (i.e., the law). It is Rep. Hostettler's intention to introduce an amendment to Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. Section 1988 which will prohibit prevailing parties from being awarded attorneys fees in religious establishment cases, but not in other civil rights filings.
Civil rights cases historically were based on the premise that the injured party was mentally, physically or monetarily injured, not as in recent events offended as those who have taken issue with prayer in school or religious decorations placed in government buildings or public squares. The ACLU has changed it's litigation standards over the years. The reason is money. Bring in 10 attorneys like the ACLU does on their cases and the cost of litigating gets real expensive to those who have the misfortune to be named defendants in the case. Most school systems and small government entities do not have the financial reserves to fight an army of attorneys. So through intimidation by threat of lawsuit many who would fight, can't.
To find out how to contact your state Representatives and Senators, visit the Stop the ACLU website. It is time for Goliath to be knocked down.
http://isitjust.blogspot.com/2005/05/house-members-fight-aclus-ill-gotten.html
House Members Fight ACLU's Ill-Gotten Gains
Members of the House of Representatives have introduced legislation to limit monetary rewards to reimburse legal fees by those who would seek to sue over religious issues. It is called the `Public Expression of Religion Act of 2005'.
I first posted on this on May 8th (read previous post). As I stated in that article, unless a litigated case can prove damage beyond a perceived state of being offended, the case will fall into this Act's jurisdiction and no monetary reimbursement for attorney fees by the party that sues can be awarded. This will reduce greatly the amount of frivolous lawsuits, as seen recently in the news, that the ACLU has initiated against schools, cities, counties, and states in which religious art in public places or on public grounds was the basis for the lawsuit. Additionally, those lawsuits stemming from "a moment of silence", prayer in public places, or any other religious issue in which the damage is an "offense" and not one that causes physical or monetary damage will fall under this Act.
Let your Congressmen know that you support this action. For too long now, the ACLU has initiated all manners of frivolous lawsuits that have cost hundreds of thousands of dollars in unnecessary litigation for taxpayers. The way the ACLU supports itself is through litigation of this nature. With the enactment of the `Public Expression of Religion Act of 2005' the financial funding for the ACLU will be dealt a huge blow. They do not work "pro bono" as they would like everyone to believe. Their attorneys will not pursue litigation that does not line their pockets one way or the other. Their work is not a charitable work for the greater good of mankind. It is all a matter of litigation for profit for the ACLU. It is time this stops.
Read more on this at Stop the ACLU.
This law has been turned on its head by the ACLU. They use this law to help fund their campaign against the very small schools and local governments it was meant to protect. This amendment does not abolish the law anyway! It only protects local and State officials from being sued for expressing their religion.
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=48219
American Legion: When Good Legislation is Abused -- Fix It
6/1/2005 10:31:00 AM